Started By
Message

re: HR 621 - Selling Off Our Public Lands - to be withdrawn

Posted on 2/2/17 at 10:55 am to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261492 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 10:55 am to
quote:


Feds own 640 million acres and we can't sell 3.3 million.
Selling 0.5% of federal land would be a disastrous development for selfish snowflake "


Yep
Posted by PNW
Northern Rockies
Member since Mar 2014
6193 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 11:21 am to
quote:

thatthang



This man gets it.
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
10981 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 11:59 am to
quote:

I can understand not wanting to sell off national parks, forests, etc., but I don't understand what purpose is served by BLM owning so much land.


It's you who owns it and have paid taxes to do so.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13501 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

I love your tone and use of quotation marks around the word 'sportsmen." First of all, I will just emphasize what you already (hopefully) know: calling someone a 'snowflake' or 'cuck' immediately identifies you as a brainless dolt.

Only to the reactionaries among my opposition. The truly educated, understand sarcasm. Maybe that's your problem.
quote:

But since we have digressed to name calling, I'll go ahead and toss in what you are: a pussy. I don't want to make too many assumptions about you but I'm fairly certain I would find your idea of 'getting in the outdoors' to be without any effort, risk, and reward- utterly boring. You drive your fatass to your deer stand, shoot a buck, and drive it back to camp. Great, try elk hunting, pussy.

Oops, that's definitely your problem. The fact that you publicly display the mindless ramblings, assumptions, and name calling that your mind so vomits freely, is distressing.
“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”
- Socrates
quote:

There are places I could take you in the Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico wilderness where I'm certain you would wilt and collapse long before the final destination, mentally and physically breaking down when you first tasted the feeling of truly being on your own: in a situation where making the wrong decision could easily result in losing your life.

You probably inhaled the dusty remnants of the shite I started leaving in those places in the 1970s! I Did come extremely close to dying in Wyoming. Surviving a bad decision greatly increased my wisdom.
quote:

These places are never private holdings

Simply wrong. But, you occasionally have to pay for the actual upkeep!
quote:

like I said to the guy above, just because you don't get out and enjoy them, don't take away the opportunities of your grandsons

Once again your feverish brain is making incorrect assumptions! If this sale had gone through my grandsons (and hopefully granddaughters) would still have 99.5% of today's public lands.
quote:

These places are all of our birthrights

You repeatedly refer to these places as wilderness, but if hundreds of millions start using their birthrights the "wild" will leave the wilderness.
quote:

we should protect them rigorously.

What happens when the "fatass pussies" as you call them decide to prohibit all human activities (hunting, fishing, hiking, camping, etc) to be the proper way to "protect them most rigorously"?

quote:

try elk hunting
then!


This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 12:03 pm
Posted by thatthang
Member since Jan 2012
6776 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 12:09 pm to
Thanks. And thanks for bringing this issue to the board. Needless to say, I find it extremely bothersome that today's hyper partisanship has resulted in sentiments such as those expressed on this thread by the pro selloff crowd, by what appear to be self described outdoorsmen, no less. Conservatism and a healthy capitalist economy is not at odds with a robust protection of what remains of our open lands, and the environment in general. In fact, I would argue the exact opposite. For christ's sake, Nixon did more for the environment in this country than just about any president in recent memory.
Posted by thatthang
Member since Jan 2012
6776 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 12:28 pm to
(1) You started with the name calling (even if you now claim you were being sarcastic), that is not a tactic I generally employ. To show the ridiculousness of your actions I made a broad generalization about you that I have no way of supporting. Let's just call this one a wash.

(2)
quote:

Surviving a bad decision greatly increased my wisdom.


If only more in this country could experience such powerful moments for growth.

(3)
quote:

Simply wrong. But, you occasionally have to pay for the actual upkeep!


Speaking of WY, show me a private holding that even comes close to touching the Wind Rivers in terms of wild environment, even if on a smaller scale.

(4)
quote:

Once again your feverish brain is making incorrect assumptions! If this sale had gone through my grandsons (and hopefully granddaughters) would still have 99.5% of today's public lands.


This argument is so weak, and can be used for eternity until everything is sold off, piece by piece. Probably 85% of our land has been developed in some way. Isn't that enough?

(5) Not worried about people overwhelming the true 'wilderness.' Most people are too lazy to substantially leave the roads. And permit systems can further limit traffic when needed.

“Wilderness is not a luxury but a necessity of the human spirit, and as vital to our lives as water and good bread. A civilization which destroys what little remains of the wild, the spare, the original, is cutting itself off from its origins and betraying the principle of civilization itself.

A man could be a lover and defender of the wilderness without ever in his lifetime leaving the boundaries of asphalt, powerlines, and right-angled surfaces. We need wilderness whether or not we ever set foot in it. We need a refuge even though we may never need to set foot in it. We need the possibility of escape as surely as we need hope; without it the life of the cities would drive all men into crime or drugs or psychoanalysis.”

- Edward Abbey
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 12:42 pm
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13501 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 12:29 pm to
Parading the ghost of Nixon around as a pillar of conservativism is most unwise.

Nixon siged a long list of progressive (liberal) legislation, including the laws that created the Environmental Protection Agency and Occupational Safety and Health Administration. He expanded the reach of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. He put two justices on the Supreme Court who would later vote with the majority on Roe v. Wade. And he implemented wage and price controls that prevented workers from receiving raises and business from passing along their increased costs!

The primary component of capitalism is private property.

The most robust protection of our wilderness would be the total exclusion of humans. Maybe they will allow limited academic studies by a few approved scientists. Your grandchildren will see this!
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45255 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 12:34 pm to
Muh Elk!
Posted by thatthang
Member since Jan 2012
6776 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

The most robust protection of our wilderness would be the total exclusion of humans. Maybe they will allow limited academic studies by a few approved scientists. Your grandchildren will see this!


You keep resorting to this extreme, straw man's argument. You seem to insist that there is no middle ground between a government selloff of land to private entities for development and absolute prohibition of man to access this land. I, of course, am advocating for the middle road: protecting the little bit we have left in an intelligent manner for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations.

ETA: In other words, I'm essentially arguing for the status quo. You seem to be the one advocating for an extreme reversal of current policy.
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 12:46 pm
Posted by PNW
Northern Rockies
Member since Mar 2014
6193 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 1:09 pm to
Trump supporters are terrified that their supreme leader and dictator will be soon losing control of his regime. It's only a matter of time before his newly acquired empire crumbles.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13501 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Speaking of WY, show me a private holding that even comes close to touching the Wind Rivers in terms of wild environment, even if on a smaller scale.

First I wish to point out that we have overwhelming agreement with wilderness and its use.

I will pick land close to private property I own:
Joyce WMA is a 27,487 acre tract located in southern Tangipahoa Parish five miles south of Hammond, LA. The 12,809 acres that originally comprised the WMA was donated by the Joyce Foundation in 1982. In 1994, an additional 2,250 acres was donated to LDWF by the Guste Heirs. The 8,364 acre Salmen/Octavia Tract was acquired in 2008 and the 2,729 acre Dendinger Tract was acquired in 2010. An additional 851 acres and 484 acres are leased from the Joyce Foundation and the Tangipahoa Parish School Board, respectively.

This entire area is a wetland within the Pontchartrain Basin and consists primarily of cypress-tupelo swamp. A large portion of the area is a dense shrub-marsh community with red maple, wax-myrtle, red bay, and younger cypress-tupelo. A 500 acre fresh marsh of primarily maiden-cane is located on the northern portion of the property. Recently, a Limited Access Area (LAA) was established in the northwestern corner of Joyce WMA. The LAA prohibits the use of internal combustion engines year-round (see WMA map for specific location).

The most sought game animals on Joyce WMA include white-tailed deer, waterfowl, rabbit and squirrel. Freshwater fish, including largemouth bass, sunfish, and catfish are also pursued on the area. Alligators and a variety of other herpetofauna are common on this WMA. Bald eagles and osprey nest in and around the WMA. Numerous other species of birds, including neotropical migrants, utilize this coastal forest during fall and spring migrations. Resident waterfowl, including wood ducks, mottled ducks, hooded mergansers, and black-bellied whistling ducks, are found on the area year-round.

I picked this now public land for several reasons. This was federal land acquired by the Louisiana Purchase and the acquisition of Spanish Florida. It was sold to private individuals. It was later donated to the State of Louisiana not the BLM. The state officials decided to make it a public WMA. Most of the land around it is private property and is indistinguishable from it. Private ownership for centuries and state ownership today created a wilderness accessible to people outside of federal control!

The big difference between you and I is faith in the federal government to keep public access to "our" birthright. We do not own it! We share it with your fatassed pussies, PETA, and millions and millions of urbanites who think public lands mean at most a road trip to Ole Faithful. They already outnumber outdoorsmen! How far behind save the whales will be followed by save the elk? If I had a dollar for every time I've heard hunting called murder, I'd be adding to my stock of frozen elk right now. I'm down to one small roast that I regularly check for signs of freezer burn. Think I'll cook it this weekend before I lose it.

New York and California cannot easily prevent Louisiana citizens from hunting state or private property. But they sure as hell can keep us out of the National Forests!
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 1:22 pm
Posted by thatthang
Member since Jan 2012
6776 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 1:44 pm to
Great post, I respect the hell out of everything you say here. We do have remarkably similar views on the importance of open lands.

I'll have to look into Joyce, that is a great land preservation success story acted out on a local level. But I would argue that outcome is the exception rather than the rule. And without having looked into the exact legal nature of that parcel, I would also argue that tract will always be somewhat in danger of sell off and subsequent development at the whims of some Baton Rouge politician struggling to find a quick fix to LA's budget woes. Same thing with Alabama state parks (where I'm originally from).

While I actually agree with you on lacking trust in the federal government, I do not see a realistic alternative that can function on a large scale in the preservation of open spaces. The mighty dollar is always a tempting pro-development incentive to a private landowner, even an outdoorsman who values its wild nature. And beyond the benefits to the outdoor way of life, this is an issue of natural security. Much of the land managed by the BLM is developed for natural resources. Harvesting those materials really needs to be done in a (somewhat) methodical manner with eye towards what the country as a whole needs so that we aren't totally reliant on imported material in times of turmoil.

I get your point on increased restrictions on hunting etc but I just don't see that movement right now. Whales are endangered, elk are not. Granted, it's not CA, but I live in CO which is home of countless environmental groups (and is moving more and more to the left) and I see no anti-hunting movement. For now at least, hunters and simple land/ habitat preservationists seem to be happy bedfellows with a mutual beneficial relationship.

Enjoy that elk roast!
Posted by PNW
Northern Rockies
Member since Mar 2014
6193 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 5:35 pm to
Elk meatloaf is rather tasty
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
14865 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

vital to our lives as water and good bread.


I don't do carbs, fatty
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13501 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:47 pm to
Friends miles and miles apart!

Not only are we miles apart, we come from different worlds in the same country. Less of your state is owned by the federals than many western states, but they do own about 36% of your state. In Louisiana they only own about 4 1/2%! Yet the motto printed the most on our license plates is "Sportsman's Paradise". Wild food gathering, hunting, fishing, and trapping are an important element of our heritage. Just watch the movie Waterboy to see how much Holly Wood makes fun of what we will eat!

We can do without the Feds because the people of Louisiana through OUR elected officials have built a nice range of state lands into our WMAs. Our state hunting and fishing licenses help support them. Some land has been purchased and some donated by private individuals and corporations. Go to wlf.louisiana.gov and look at the map of Louisiana in green with the WMAs in red. One can leave the French Quarter of New Orleans and drive by Joyce WMA in about 30 minutes!

Much of privately owned rural LA is available to hunt. My family and friends hunted swamp rabbits for free on an old orange farm down the Mississippi for a decade with the permission of the old lady who owned it. We just fixed little things around her house and visited her. Some still hunt it as a lease from her descendents. Groups of hunters form life long friends by joining hunting clubs that make large sections of land leases affordable. And leases allow private ownership to benignly neglect their unimproved land by paying the property tax and putting a little spending money in their pockets. Landowners win, wildlife wins, and sportsmen win. And the anti hunters of the world can kiss our collective arses!

Oh by the way, the whale species hunted by the Japanese on Whale Wars are not endangered. They are either at capacity, or there numbers are increasing, despite the hunting. You are a person who advocates harvesting wildlife for human consumption, sport, and becoming part of nature. But they have you convinced whales are endangered! How hard to convince a young mother and children in Central Park that a shot that dropped a deer with out a step is not a thing of beauty but a great evil!?

I think Colorado ownership and Colorado citizen ownership will better guarantee your future hunting rights. I would be happy to purchase a Colorado out of state hunting license to help maintain y'alls WMA system!
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:58 pm to
meanwhile the CRA used to get rid of the mining stream protection rule

although if i had to choose between the two... good bye 621
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram