- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How would you deal w/ NOKO and not hurt the South Koreans?
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:20 pm to northshorebamaman
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:20 pm to northshorebamaman
what if China and Russia are giving fatass all of his military play missiles? I mean come on.... fatass is not ordering them off the internet.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:20 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:Why would China do that?
But what if we got the Chinese to do the blockade?
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:21 pm to hsfolk
Do we have missles that could take out nukes, mid flight?
Does China?
Station naval ships aggressively near in international waters.
Challenge them to act first. Passive aggressive like..
If they fire a wmd.. blow it out of the sky..
China will then get involved.
Destroy them.
Give the land to China using high trade negotiations.
Keep South Korea but de-militarize a bit as sign of good faith.
Use conflict to establish India - China border disputes,
China wins some small things, but now fixing nk is their damn problem
Does China?
Station naval ships aggressively near in international waters.
Challenge them to act first. Passive aggressive like..
If they fire a wmd.. blow it out of the sky..
China will then get involved.
Destroy them.
Give the land to China using high trade negotiations.
Keep South Korea but de-militarize a bit as sign of good faith.
Use conflict to establish India - China border disputes,
China wins some small things, but now fixing nk is their damn problem
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:25 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
yeah they would have taken fatass out years ago.
I say chill the frick out get off NK and tell our media to STFU about broadcasting NK propaganda just because Trump said something. (Frick our MSM really my apologies to medic-AP reuters is headlining NK's BS.)
Have Dennis Rodman and Sean Penn and an entire BB team of spec ops go in and take the twat midget fatass out.
I say chill the frick out get off NK and tell our media to STFU about broadcasting NK propaganda just because Trump said something. (Frick our MSM really my apologies to medic-AP reuters is headlining NK's BS.)
Have Dennis Rodman and Sean Penn and an entire BB team of spec ops go in and take the twat midget fatass out.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:28 pm to Kentucker
quote:
No, they wouldn't. SOKO is armed to the teeth and eager for a fight with the little fat man. I've seen their bases and our military might over there. If China stays out of it, it'll be a short battle. SOKO's armaments are vastly superior to NOKO's.
bullshite. Someone who has actually been over there should know that Seoul is only 35 miles from the DMZ. The notion that NK wouldn't inflict massive damage on Seoul with its thousands of pieces of artillery is downright comical.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:29 pm to vilma4prez
There is an answer in Reagan era weaponry. We use our satellites and other means to figure out where their artillery sites are threatening Seoul. We pinpoint as many of their installations as possible and where Kim Jung Fat and his cronies are hiding.
Standing start strikes. The neutron bomb is the answer to the immediate threat to Seoul. I am sure we could convert some of our tactical weapons quickly. Set off a few airbursts over the artillery sites and the radiation will kill all the crews, without a lot of damage to structures and buildings.
Same thing to any North Korean Troop or tank columns. Kill the troops with very little collateral damage or lingering radiation.
Have enough AEGIS ships , THAAD and Patriot 3 batteries ready for the inevitable missile launches, those that are not taken out by neutron strikes and bunker busters in the initial attacks.
Take down the North Korean Air Force with still more neutron strikes plus establish air superiority. When all this is accomplished, hunt down Fat arse and end this.
Standing start strikes. The neutron bomb is the answer to the immediate threat to Seoul. I am sure we could convert some of our tactical weapons quickly. Set off a few airbursts over the artillery sites and the radiation will kill all the crews, without a lot of damage to structures and buildings.
Same thing to any North Korean Troop or tank columns. Kill the troops with very little collateral damage or lingering radiation.
Have enough AEGIS ships , THAAD and Patriot 3 batteries ready for the inevitable missile launches, those that are not taken out by neutron strikes and bunker busters in the initial attacks.
Take down the North Korean Air Force with still more neutron strikes plus establish air superiority. When all this is accomplished, hunt down Fat arse and end this.
This post was edited on 8/8/17 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:32 pm to hsfolk
quote:
How would you deal w/ NOKO and not hurt the South Koreans?
3 precision bombing runs.
1 completely destroys and levels Pyongyang and everyone in it.
2 completely levels their next highest concentration of military assets
3 explodes the weapons facility housing their nuclear program.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:42 pm to hsfolk
I'm guessing gas is off the table. So I'd go with hitting them with an EMP (if a functional one exists) with simultaneous massive bombings. Have embedded SK commandos take out fat boy and his posse
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:45 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
bullshite. Someone who has actually been over there should know that Seoul is only 35 miles from the DMZ. The notion that NK wouldn't inflict massive damage on Seoul with its thousands of pieces of artillery is downright comical.
bullshite back at you. I've been to the DMZ and I've seen the SOKO and American bases bordering it. While the Seoul metro area is some 20 million people (40% of the SOKO population), the fortifications between it and the DMZ are so dense as to be impenetrable by NOKO. The commies might try to fire over it at Seoul but they'd be ineffective because they'd be under an awesome attack from U.S. and SOKO forces. Don't call bullshite unless you know what you're talking about.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:51 pm to hsfolk
The largest coordinated attack on a country the world has ever seen. Absolute shock and awe on the DMZ with over a 100 planes hitting artillary targets all at once to minimize the South Korean blow.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:54 pm to Rakim
I would love to see a "Total War" type simulation of the possibilities. (For non gamers Total War is a war strategy game that simulates battles, albeit they deal more with infantry).
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:56 pm to hsfolk
Just send the food the North Koreans want/need. Ultimately that may be the lowest cost option with the only victims being North Korean citizens.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 10:59 pm to flyAU
The problem in every simulation I've seen is the amount of time it takes the US to secure the nuclear facilities. Usually in the simulation it's 50-60 days with <90,000 troops. This is why China is important. They "coincidentally" 100,000 troops on the North Korean border Hmmmm?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News