- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How would a libertarian world deal with a serious epidemic?
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:18 am to cwill
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:18 am to cwill
It's not terribly important that "everyone respects NAP". A great many people don't respect society's proscription against murder, yet we find a way to lock them in cages, regardless.
But yeah, I'm a minarchist, so defending anarchism is more of a pastime than anything
But yeah, I'm a minarchist, so defending anarchism is more of a pastime than anything
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:20 am to cwill
how would the CDC handle an epidemic?
poorly I would assume by watching the news of what's going on
poorly I would assume by watching the news of what's going on
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:22 am to Joshjrn
quote:
It's not terribly important that "everyone respects NAP". A great many people don't respect society's proscription against murder, yet we find a way to lock them in cages, regardless.
Aggression can just as often be misperception, in my experience.
Your scenario posted above would work, but I'm afraid it requires too much perfect information.
Thanks for the discussion.
Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:31 pm to Joshjrn
A private disease control center wouldn't even break eve, let alone profit. It would be non-existent in ancapistan.
Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:35 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
A private disease control center wouldn't even break eve, let alone profit. It would be non-existent in ancapistan.
What you just said translates as "free individuals would not prioritize research in, and containment of, highly infectious deadly diseases and would therefore not fund such an endeavor in a manner in which it would properly and adequately function."
Talk about a hypothetical in which people aren't acting like people...
Posted on 10/3/14 at 2:39 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I am a card-carrying libertarian. I am not an anarchist. My rights stop where yours begin and vice versa. In the absence of the CDC, you don't think a private organization, or multiple private organizations, would spring up to replace it, and be more accountable, efficient, and effective as a result? There would probably be some sort of insurance that helps fund such an organization that gives those paying access to treatment. There would likely be multiple such organizations, each competing to prove they are each the best at disease control in the hopes of getting the most subscribers. Free market solution.
Posted on 10/3/14 at 2:47 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Transhuman libertarians won't have to deal with silly things like disease and pandemic.
Posted on 10/3/14 at 2:49 pm to TOKEN
quote:
I agree, this is a weak area for the libertarians. Anytime "big government" is actually needed the libertarian ldeology runs into this problem.
This. Libertarian arguments for disasters are laughable sometimes. I wonder when they think the government SHOULD step in? Zombie uprising? Alien invasion?
It's (naive) ideology refusing to reconcile itself with reality.
This post was edited on 10/3/14 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 10/3/14 at 2:51 pm to REG861
quote:
I wonder when they think the government SHOULD step in?
What government? I don't want any roads, man.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News