- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How the fake news MSM works in real time....watch the steps
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:44 pm
1. Some "anonymous" source creates a statement about some Russian "collusion" evidence
2. Nobody has actually seen the evidence
3. MSM outlet, usually the WaPo or NYT, runs the story
4. It gets picked up by the smaller prog outlets, buzzfeed, politico, etc.
5. They all literally run the SAME frickING STORY
6. the MSM Tv talks about "all this evidence" whereas the only evidence is the prog media repeating themselves
7. Some other "anonymous" source confirms the first "anonymous" source and explains how the sky is falling
8. The secondary prog filth media then repeats this new secondary lie as fact
9. truth comes out
10. Media acts like it never happened.
2. Nobody has actually seen the evidence
3. MSM outlet, usually the WaPo or NYT, runs the story
4. It gets picked up by the smaller prog outlets, buzzfeed, politico, etc.
5. They all literally run the SAME frickING STORY
6. the MSM Tv talks about "all this evidence" whereas the only evidence is the prog media repeating themselves
7. Some other "anonymous" source confirms the first "anonymous" source and explains how the sky is falling
8. The secondary prog filth media then repeats this new secondary lie as fact
9. truth comes out
10. Media acts like it never happened.
11
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:45 pm to CptBengal
We're on what today, 6?
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:48 pm to CptBengal
It really is amusing when this happens. The bots come out from hiding and post, ad nauseam, the same tripe over and over.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:48 pm to llfshoals
quote:
We're on what today, 6?
5 right now.
6 will be the evening news shows.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:49 pm to CptBengal
So the IC had to have the email, or else how does it get leaked to the nyt.
That being known, the IC still wasn't investigating trump.
Yet liberals are bumping dicks as if they have something here.
That being known, the IC still wasn't investigating trump.
Yet liberals are bumping dicks as if they have something here.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:50 pm to CptBengal
Really because the way I saw it was:
1. NYT comes out with reporting about Truml Jr meeting with Russian lawyer
2. Trumpkins claim fake news
3. Trump Jr admits to meeting but isn't truthful about it
4. NYT reports more details
3. Trumpkins say it was just about adoptions!
4. Trump Jr admits that impetus wasn't about adoptions.
5. NYT obviously has emails
6. Trumpkins, NYT doesn't have shite.
7. Trump Jr gets scared releases emails
8. Trumpkins: who cares!? It wasn't illegal! But but Hilary!
1. NYT comes out with reporting about Truml Jr meeting with Russian lawyer
2. Trumpkins claim fake news
3. Trump Jr admits to meeting but isn't truthful about it
4. NYT reports more details
3. Trumpkins say it was just about adoptions!
4. Trump Jr admits that impetus wasn't about adoptions.
5. NYT obviously has emails
6. Trumpkins, NYT doesn't have shite.
7. Trump Jr gets scared releases emails
8. Trumpkins: who cares!? It wasn't illegal! But but Hilary!
This post was edited on 7/11/17 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:50 pm to CptBengal
quote:Been on Twitter lately?
2. Nobody has actually seen the evidence
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:51 pm to CptBengal
Where does, "person of interest in story verifies the original story" fall in your step system?
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:51 pm to Iosh
quote:
2. Nobody has actually seen the evidence
Been on Twitter lately?
So the NYT had the emails when they ran the story?
fail again, "libertarian"
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:52 pm to CptBengal
quote:I don't know, but the information they had is accurate, so I'm not sure what this gotcha is all about.
So the NYT had the emails when they ran the story?
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:53 pm to CptBengal
quote:Yes, that's why Junior posted them. NYT said they were publishing them and asked for comment.
So the NYT had the emails when they ran the story?
This post was edited on 7/11/17 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:56 pm to CptBengal
quote:
1. Some "anonymous" source creates a statement about some Russian "collusion" evidence
If it's an FBI leaker it goes to the NYTs. If it's a CIA leaker it goes to WaPo. I have never seen a divergence from this pattern.
quote:
2. Nobody has actually seen the evidence
Right. Their usual plan is to allow the person they want to take down to entrap themselves by making statements contrary to the evidence they hold, if they hold any.
quote:
3. MSM outlet, usually the WaPo or NYT, runs the story
Yep. This is where fake news originates...from deep state opponents in the FBI and CIA.
quote:
4. It gets picked up by the smaller prog outlets, buzzfeed, politico, etc.
Yep. And the lemmings repeat the fake news narrative.
quote:
5. They all literally run the SAME frickING STORY
To a "T".
quote:
6. the MSM Tv talks about "all this evidence" whereas the only evidence is the prog media repeating themselves
It's to the point where some "news" organization source themselves:
quote:
7. Some other "anonymous" source confirms the first "anonymous" source and explains how the sky is falling
And it get over analyzed with hypos and "what-ifs" ad nauseum by people like Anna Navaro.
quote:
8. The secondary prog filth media then repeats this new secondary lie as fact
Right. And McCain and Graham usually come out and play the role of the concerned Republican.
quote:
9. truth comes out
Usually. Or the story just dies.
quote:
10. Media acts like it never happened.
With a straight face. By this time they have moved on to another story starting at number 1.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:58 pm to CptBengal
They seem to also work in conjunction with left trolls and shills that come out from hiding on the internet.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 1:00 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
s by fouldeliverer
Really because the way I saw it was:
1. NYT comes out with reporting about Truml Jr meeting with Russian lawyer
2. Trumpkins claim fake news
3. Trump Jr admits to meeting but isn't truthful about it
4. NYT reports more details
3. Trumpkins say it was just about adoptions!
4. Trump Jr admits that impetus wasn't about adoptions.
5. NYT obviously has emails
6. Trumpkins, NYT doesn't have shite.
7. Trump Jr gets scared releases emails
8. Trumpkins: who cares!? It wasn't illegal! But but Hilary!
Your forgot 9.) Ignore everything that happened 1-8 and call it Fake News again.
All from the people that brought you Pizzagate, Seth Rich, birtherism, and the compulsive liar in chief.
This post was edited on 7/11/17 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 7/11/17 at 1:02 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
They seem to also work in conjunction with left trolls and shills that come out from hiding on the internet.
They defiantly work with ShariaBlue.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 1:05 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
Really because the way I saw it was:
1. Not based on reality
2. Will never be based on reality
3. Will still be hoped that it will be treated as reality someday
Posted on 7/11/17 at 1:07 pm to CptBengal
100% correct.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 1:10 pm to CptBengal
Back to the reliable old Trump Zombie battle cry I see eh Captain.
Deflect deflect fake news deflect.
Deflect deflect fake news deflect.
Posted on 7/11/17 at 1:22 pm to asurob1
quote:
Back to the reliable old Trump Zombie battle cry I see eh Captain.
Then why is the MSM so incompetent? The MSM and the DNC have been trying since Nov 9th to explain HRC's loss, prove some type of illegal activity or collusion/treason/illegal activity by Trump or someone in his campaign. Nothing, let me repeat, Nothing has been proven or evidence provided since then. MSM/DNC has been working 24/7 since then and found nothing.. even made shite up, and that has been proven.
So either there is really nothing there, or would you agree that MSM/DNC is incompetent having not found anything yet?
Also BTW, if so many Americans were/are against Trump, then why have the Dems not picked up just one seat in any of the special elections that have been held?
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News