- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
House Dems want to know why major Russian money laundering case abruptly settled
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:24 pm
Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee sent a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Wednesday asking why the Department of Justice settled a major money-laundering case involving a real-estate company owned by the son of a powerful Russian government official whose lawyer met with Donald Trump Jr. last year.
Trump Jr., the president's eldest son, on Tuesday tweeted an email chain from June 2016 in which he entertained accepting damaging information from a "Russian government attorney" about Hillary Clinton as part of the Kremlin's support for his father's campaign.
That attorney, Natalia Veselnitskaya, represents the family of Pyotr Katsyv, the former vice governor of the Moscow region, whose son, Denis, owns the real-estate company Prevezon. The DOJ had been investigating whether Prevezon laundered millions of dollars through New York City real estate when the case was unexpectedly settled two days before going to trial in May.
Business Insider
Trump Jr., the president's eldest son, on Tuesday tweeted an email chain from June 2016 in which he entertained accepting damaging information from a "Russian government attorney" about Hillary Clinton as part of the Kremlin's support for his father's campaign.
That attorney, Natalia Veselnitskaya, represents the family of Pyotr Katsyv, the former vice governor of the Moscow region, whose son, Denis, owns the real-estate company Prevezon. The DOJ had been investigating whether Prevezon laundered millions of dollars through New York City real estate when the case was unexpectedly settled two days before going to trial in May.
Business Insider
12
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:26 pm to LSU1NSEC
This is the one!!! Y'all got him!!
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:26 pm to LSU1NSEC
I'm pretty sure the Clinton Foundation is involved.
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:26 pm to LSU1NSEC
I would like to know this as well
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:26 pm to LSU1NSEC
This is it. They finally got him!
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:27 pm to LSU1NSEC
You realize that attorney worked for the DNC, right? The Dems can ask her why she settled. She is on their payroll.
Also it is sensational bs to say a case "unexpectedly settled two days before trial". Cases settle all of the time right before trial. That is probably the most common time. Try again, man.
Also it is sensational bs to say a case "unexpectedly settled two days before trial". Cases settle all of the time right before trial. That is probably the most common time. Try again, man.
This post was edited on 7/13/17 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:27 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
that attorney worked for the DNC, right? The Dems can ask her why she settled.
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:28 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:frick I hope so. Send then both to jail, in the same cell
I'm pretty sure the Clinton Foundation is involved.
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:29 pm to LSU1NSEC
When was the case settled?
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:31 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
The DOJ had been investigating
Was this on Lynch then?
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:33 pm to LSU1NSEC
I will bet if you dig deep enough HRC and dems are involved in something shady as hell. 
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:33 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
When was the case settled?
quote:
"Last summer, Donald Trump Jr. met with a Kremlin-connected attorney in an attempt to obtain information 'that would incriminate Hillary,'" the Democrats wrote, citing the emails he published. "Earlier this year, on May 12, 2017, the Department of Justice made an abrupt decision to settle a money laundering case being handled by that same attorney in the Southern District of New York.
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:35 pm to cajunangelle
Oh, there's some super cool theories being floated around now but I can't post them - would take forever to explain and trumpkins wouldn't believe it anyway so... basically waste of my time.
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:35 pm to cajunangelle
quote:I think both parties are shady as hell right now. It would not surprise me in the least that both parties were accepting foreign donations from Russia.
I will bet if you dig deep enough HRC and dems are involved in something shady as hell.
There's something fricky going on right now.
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:36 pm to LSU1NSEC
You are being one of the useful idiots. Settling before trial (especially right before trial) isn't unexpected or abrupt. It is common. Expected even.
Also...the Russian attorney that settled works for the DNC. So why don't the Dems just ask her why she settled?
Dude....you have got to stop chasing your tail. I know your thing is to call everything racist...and you are now applying that same intellect and discretion to Muh Russians....but you have to get tired of looking silly at some point, right? I mean...is it really that fun to troll?
Also...the Russian attorney that settled works for the DNC. So why don't the Dems just ask her why she settled?
Dude....you have got to stop chasing your tail. I know your thing is to call everything racist...and you are now applying that same intellect and discretion to Muh Russians....but you have to get tired of looking silly at some point, right? I mean...is it really that fun to troll?
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:37 pm to kingbob
quote:
I would like to know this as well
So you're all in favor of the Legislative Branch of government attempting to usurp the Separation of Powers by making demands upon the Executive Branch?
What's next, asking the SCOTUS to report on why their decision in Roe V Wade has not been overturned?
How about the reverse? Why not have POTUS demand both Houses of Congress drop the phony witch hunt committees since there is zero evidence of anything?
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:38 pm to themunch
quote:
Was this on Lynch then?
Preet Bahara was handling the case before he was fired.
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:39 pm to BBONDS25
You realize significance of "House Judiciary Committee" requesting this I assume?
BTW no idea who the f'k you are but 411 - I ignore insults. Keep it to yourself.
BTW no idea who the f'k you are but 411 - I ignore insults. Keep it to yourself.
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:39 pm to LSU1NSEC
quote:From "chatter"???
Oh, there's some super cool theories being floated around now
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:42 pm to Sidicous
quote:
So you're all in favor of the Legislative Branch of government attempting to usurp the Separation of Powers by making demands upon the Executive Branch?
What's next, asking the SCOTUS to report on why their decision in Roe V Wade has not been overturned?
How about the reverse? Why not have POTUS demand both Houses of Congress drop the phony witch hunt committees since there is zero evidence of anything?
That's not really the same comparison. All they're doing is asking for the terms of the settlement. I don't really see anything wrong with it.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News