- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Homeland Sec Committee Dems concerned about BORTAC’s authorityin stopping Uvalde shooter
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:36 pm
@Anna_Giaritelli
House Democrats intend to hold a hearing to determine exactly what legal authority Border Patrol/ICE agents had to have gotten involved in (and stopped) the Uvalde shooting and potential future incidents
At the same time, Homeland Dems “commend” federal agents for saving the day
LINK
House Democrats intend to hold a hearing to determine exactly what legal authority Border Patrol/ICE agents had to have gotten involved in (and stopped) the Uvalde shooting and potential future incidents
At the same time, Homeland Dems “commend” federal agents for saving the day
LINK
11
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:38 pm to Jbird
quote:
House Democrats intend to hold a hearing to determine exactly what legal authority Border Patrol/ICE agents had to have gotten involved in (and stopped) the Uvalde shooting and potential future incidents
I feel like I'm being spun around in a gunny sack.
ETA: Things like this just add fuel to the conspiracy theory fire that these events are orchestrated by nefarious actors.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:39 pm to Jbird
“Great catch, Hayes! Don’t ever fricking do it again!”
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:41 pm to Jbird
quote:
House Democrats intend to hold a hearing to determine exactly what legal authority Border Patrol/ICE agents had to have gotten involved in (and stopped) the Uvalde shooting and potential future incidents
That guy who grabbed an old shotgun and charged in their had a daughter at the school. That is all the authority you need.
Local law enforcement went weak kneed and Border Patrol stepped up
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:42 pm to teke184
They must have wanted the death toll to be higher….Seems like Dems wanted “The deadliest school shooting “ headline, and this dude didn’t give it to them…
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:42 pm to Jbird
Dems asking the hard questions - "When little kids are getting mass murdered, what IS the proper chain of command?"
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:44 pm to Jbird
Seems like democrats are more upset that the shooting was stopped than they are about the shooting itself.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:44 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
That guy who grabbed an old shotgun and charged in their had a daughter at the school. That is all the authority you need.
Yeah, think he was off duty, and not acting in his official capacity, other than “ I’m dad, stfu”….
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:47 pm to CamdenTiger
His wife also I believe
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:54 pm to Jbird
Wasn’t the border patrol agent a parent? Or spouse of a teacher?
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:01 pm to Jbird
quote:
Homeland Sec Committee Dems concerned about BORTAC’s authorityin stopping Uvalde shooter
Translation:
Border Patrol/ICE agents interfered with a false flag operation and the DEMS wanted a higher death count.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:01 pm to Lightning
quote:
Dems asking the hard questions - "When little kids are getting mass murdered, what IS the proper chain of command?"
I mean, is that not what they did to our military for the past few decades?
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:08 pm to Lightning
quote:
"When little kids are getting mass murdered, what IS the proper chain of command?"
You are a lawyer, correct?
It might not be the legal or proper procedural thing to do... but I do believe we'd both agree that in that scenario, anyone with the situational circumstances that would allow them to summarily put down the threat with extreme prejudice, should do just that.
If I've got a kid in a classroom with a gunman and the cops are doing nothing and trying to hold me back, I'll disobey and deal with the consequences later. They can shoot me in the back or put me in jail after I save some kids. Ironically, I probably actually would get put in jail for carrying a firearm into a school. But if I find myself in an advantageous position to end the threat, I'll take it.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:12 pm to Jbird
How dare you hurt children!
How dare you stop the rights of another to hurt children!
How dare you stop the rights of another to hurt children!
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:16 pm to Jbird
The border patrol interferes with their agenda. They wanted MOREA kids to be shot.
These people are evil
These people are evil
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:20 pm to Jbird
These idiots are stuck.
Dems: “we need to have federal law govern state run schools.”
Also Dems: “no not that federal law. Not the bad ones.”
Dems: “we need to have federal law govern state run schools.”
Also Dems: “no not that federal law. Not the bad ones.”
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:21 pm to Jack Carter
So they are going to try and jack this dude up and make an example of him?
For protecting his wife and daughter (not to mention all the rest of the wives and kids)
That seems like the Dem way.
For protecting his wife and daughter (not to mention all the rest of the wives and kids)
That seems like the Dem way.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:31 pm to Jack Carter
quote:Or, tinfoil engaged, they want to show that a stronger federal presence is needed in all schools, since offduty feds are better than locals. And if you want that federal presence, you will follow our rules, further entrenching themselves. They never pass up an opportunity.
The border patrol interferes with their agenda.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:49 pm to dakarx
quote:
So they are going to try and jack this dude up and make an example of him?
Would not be the least bit surprised if he ends up facing criminal charges over this.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:05 pm to VADawg
They can try.
I see a jury nullification if they manage to get it to trial and a bunch of questions as to why the guy who stopped the shooter is being punished but not the cops who refused to act.
I see a jury nullification if they manage to get it to trial and a bunch of questions as to why the guy who stopped the shooter is being punished but not the cops who refused to act.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News