- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hilldabeast Doubling Down on Trump being a "Sexual Assaulter"
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:21 pm
"Shining a bright spotlight on just him [Weinstein] is missing the point. We have a confessed sexual assaulter in our White House. So we can’t just say, oh my gosh, condemn this one person and move on. This is a larger problem in society."
Does she not realize how incredibly little credibility she has on this subject? Does she not realize Bill did far worse, that is even assuming Trump did "grab" anyone?
Economist Interview
Does she not realize how incredibly little credibility she has on this subject? Does she not realize Bill did far worse, that is even assuming Trump did "grab" anyone?
Economist Interview
9
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:22 pm to Pigimus Prime
As annoying as she tends to be, her meltdowns are quite entertaining.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:23 pm to Cajunese
It gets better!
"But here’s how clever the Trump campaign is. Put this into context. So on October 7th, in the morning, as I write in the book, two of our top security and intelligence officials say the Russians hacked the DNC and the Russians pose a threat to our election. A few hours later, the Hollywood Access tape comes out. Within an hour, the theft of John Podesta, my campaign chairman’s, emails, are out on WikiLeaks. Now, if you think about this, the Hollywood Access story was wall-to-wall coverage for 48–72 hours, and then it faded. WikiLeaks were dribbled out a thousand a day for the next month. And people kind of thought, well, I know all about this Hollywood Access tape. I want to find out about WikiLeaks. And then stories were made up, fake news was created, the most horrible allegations that you know, I’m running a child trafficking ring with John Podesta. Just absurd! Total lies."
"But here’s how clever the Trump campaign is. Put this into context. So on October 7th, in the morning, as I write in the book, two of our top security and intelligence officials say the Russians hacked the DNC and the Russians pose a threat to our election. A few hours later, the Hollywood Access tape comes out. Within an hour, the theft of John Podesta, my campaign chairman’s, emails, are out on WikiLeaks. Now, if you think about this, the Hollywood Access story was wall-to-wall coverage for 48–72 hours, and then it faded. WikiLeaks were dribbled out a thousand a day for the next month. And people kind of thought, well, I know all about this Hollywood Access tape. I want to find out about WikiLeaks. And then stories were made up, fake news was created, the most horrible allegations that you know, I’m running a child trafficking ring with John Podesta. Just absurd! Total lies."
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:23 pm to Pigimus Prime
quote:
We had a confessed sexual assaulter in our White House when I was First Lady.
FIFY
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:23 pm to Cajunese
I hope this dumb bitch never gets it and just continues on with her stupidity. As if the rest of the world has forgotten who exactly she is married to ?
Oh, and FTR only a complete idiot would believe that she didn't have any idea of Harvey's reputation either.
Oh, and FTR only a complete idiot would believe that she didn't have any idea of Harvey's reputation either.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:24 pm to Pigimus Prime
quote:Better than having a confessed liar, sexual assaulter, embezzler, murderer and criminal in the White House.
We have a confessed sexual assaulter in our White House.
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:24 pm to Pigimus Prime
We are watching in real time the absolute mental dismantling of a former public official right before our eyes.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:24 pm to Pigimus Prime
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:25 pm to Pigimus Prime
quote:This is a HUGE issue for the Dems because it concerns their narrative. They MUST change the headlines on this story because right now a major leftist and a major leftist industry are being portrayed as sexual predators. Which they are.
"Shining a bright spotlight on just him [Weinstein] is missing the point. We have a confessed sexual assaulter in our White House.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:28 pm to bamarep
When being pushed by the interviewer on whether she had any clearly articlulated ideas—and that The Economist struggled to identify her positions, Clinton responds:
"Well, you know, I’m sorry about that. And I loved your endorsement, so clearly some people found what I was saying pretty convincing. But I’m not going to argue with that, because clearly it didn’t work. So whatever might have worked, I got three million more votes, so clearly far more voters understood what I stood for and what I wanted to do. But in terms of combating a message that was really aimed at stoking anger and resentment and grievance, I plead inadequate. Because I did not know how to combat what was from the very first day of the Trump campaign an incredibly hate-filled tirade first against immigrants, and then with increasing numbers of people who were being scapegoated and blamed for whatever ailed you. And I say in the book, you know, I understood the anger people felt because I talked about it endlessly. I talked about the disaster of the financial crisis and how people still hadn’t recovered. So I was saying, but we’ve gotta go on, and here’s what we can do, and I had very specific proposals that would have really helped people and their families. But I didn’t say, you know what, you should hate everybody, and you should be really burned up about this. I didn’t do that. Now maybe I could have done a little more of that without crossing my own line of what was appropriate."
The delusion is stunning.
"Well, you know, I’m sorry about that. And I loved your endorsement, so clearly some people found what I was saying pretty convincing. But I’m not going to argue with that, because clearly it didn’t work. So whatever might have worked, I got three million more votes, so clearly far more voters understood what I stood for and what I wanted to do. But in terms of combating a message that was really aimed at stoking anger and resentment and grievance, I plead inadequate. Because I did not know how to combat what was from the very first day of the Trump campaign an incredibly hate-filled tirade first against immigrants, and then with increasing numbers of people who were being scapegoated and blamed for whatever ailed you. And I say in the book, you know, I understood the anger people felt because I talked about it endlessly. I talked about the disaster of the financial crisis and how people still hadn’t recovered. So I was saying, but we’ve gotta go on, and here’s what we can do, and I had very specific proposals that would have really helped people and their families. But I didn’t say, you know what, you should hate everybody, and you should be really burned up about this. I didn’t do that. Now maybe I could have done a little more of that without crossing my own line of what was appropriate."
The delusion is stunning.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:28 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:30 pm to L.A.
"You know, I beat Bernie Sanders by four million votes, okay. So that was a landslide by any definition. He was very clear that there was only one message, a single message about billionaires, you know, take back America from the billionaires, and he had ideas which were hard for him to explain but he never had to explain them except in one editorial board meeting with the New York Daily News. Otherwise, he could just hammer away. Now, he lost the Democratic primary, and so I’m arguing that it can’t be either-or, it has to be both-and. So when people say, you know, just give up on that civil rights stuff, don’t talk about it. Look what Trump is doing. He’s playing to his base by demeaning black athletes who are standing up against racism, or kneeling down against racism and injustice. You know, what are the Democrats supposed to say? Oh, we don’t want to talk about it, oh it’s too controversial? No! Stand up for what you believe in and what you know is right. If it costs you votes, go find the votes somewhere else. I didn’t do a good enough job fighting suppression and finding the votes somewhere else. But I am determined to make sure the Democratic Party doesn’t make the mistake of walking away from so many of the values and [the] progress that we have helped to bring about."
Clearly she is on drugs.
Clearly she is on drugs.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:30 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Oh, and FTR only a complete idiot would believe that she didn't have any idea of Harvey's reputation either.
For HER, it's selective dementia. How many times over the last couple of years have we heard her say "I don't recall"? If she hopes to maintain any credibility she needs to start using dementia as an excuse because no one in their sane mind will believe half the crap she puts out there.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:31 pm to L.A.
quote:
This is a HUGE issue for the Dems because it concerns their narrative. They MUST change the headlines on this story because right now a major leftist and a major leftist industry are being portrayed as sexual predators. Which they are.
It's funny because it is like sending out the Menendez brothers to talk about honoring your parents.
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:33 pm to therick711
quote:
It's funny because it is like sending out the Menendez brothers to talk about honoring your parents.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:33 pm to bamarep
quote:
We are watching in real time the absolute mental dismantling of a former public official right before our eyes.
I said this way back in October or November of last year. Losing the election to Trump was far more punishment for Hillary than being put in jail ever would be. She's literally lost her god damned mind.
I believe an official pardon from Trump would set her over the edge. He should do it.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:36 pm to bamarep
quote:
We are watching in real time the absolute mental dismantling of a former public official right before our eyes.
At least Gore had the decency to go into hiding for a few months and come out a buck fifty heavier. We didn't have to watch him down all that food to drown his sorrows. Gross, yet somehow not as gross as this.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:39 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
This gets better my friends.
" Now why in heaven anyone would want to have two nuclear crises? One is more than enough for anybody in the Oval Office to try to deal with. But that shows both his impulsiveness and his personal pique that can’t ever be satisfied unless he looks like he’s dominating and winning. His diplomacy by Twitter, with respect to Kim Jong Un, is playing right into Kim Jong Un’s hands, and creating a very dangerous situation for the region and for us. His decertifying Iran is actually helping Iran, not hurting Iran, because we put a lid. I started the negotiations with Iran. We did put a lid on Iran’s nuclear program. That didn’t end all of Iran’s bad behaviour, it wasn’t intended to. But it was intended to give us a little more leeway to deal with that bad behaviour, not having to worry about centrifuges spinning away in underground facilities."
She is so far off base on these it is sad. Sad!
"Well we don’t know yet. Certainly I worry that it’s the latter, but I’m hoping that the damage he’s doing to global stability, to America’s role in the world, to counting on American leadership, and the word that that we give, can be remedied by getting a new congress, by getting a new president. So I’m not prepared to say, but I will just quickly add this: there are fissures and cracks in Western democracy. Otherwise you would not have a Brexit vote, you would not have the far right and the far left rising up in Europe and North America. You would have a necessary reckoning about what was not successful and trying to reign in powerful forces who only care about wealth and ideology and their own position. But we’ve got all of these divisions. He didn’t create them, he masterfully played upon them and exploited them, and we better deal with that regardless of who’s in the White House. "
And there, my friends, is the shite to watch out for. The left is going to continue to associate any sort of right—or even centrist—victory with being undemocratic. It is classic playbook for them. There is no one on earth that deserves a snap back to reality than HRC.
" Now why in heaven anyone would want to have two nuclear crises? One is more than enough for anybody in the Oval Office to try to deal with. But that shows both his impulsiveness and his personal pique that can’t ever be satisfied unless he looks like he’s dominating and winning. His diplomacy by Twitter, with respect to Kim Jong Un, is playing right into Kim Jong Un’s hands, and creating a very dangerous situation for the region and for us. His decertifying Iran is actually helping Iran, not hurting Iran, because we put a lid. I started the negotiations with Iran. We did put a lid on Iran’s nuclear program. That didn’t end all of Iran’s bad behaviour, it wasn’t intended to. But it was intended to give us a little more leeway to deal with that bad behaviour, not having to worry about centrifuges spinning away in underground facilities."
She is so far off base on these it is sad. Sad!
"Well we don’t know yet. Certainly I worry that it’s the latter, but I’m hoping that the damage he’s doing to global stability, to America’s role in the world, to counting on American leadership, and the word that that we give, can be remedied by getting a new congress, by getting a new president. So I’m not prepared to say, but I will just quickly add this: there are fissures and cracks in Western democracy. Otherwise you would not have a Brexit vote, you would not have the far right and the far left rising up in Europe and North America. You would have a necessary reckoning about what was not successful and trying to reign in powerful forces who only care about wealth and ideology and their own position. But we’ve got all of these divisions. He didn’t create them, he masterfully played upon them and exploited them, and we better deal with that regardless of who’s in the White House. "
And there, my friends, is the shite to watch out for. The left is going to continue to associate any sort of right—or even centrist—victory with being undemocratic. It is classic playbook for them. There is no one on earth that deserves a snap back to reality than HRC.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:57 pm to Pigimus Prime
Cracks in Western democracy are because people like herself sold their positions, sold out their country, and they did it all for power and money.
You'd think Trump had ben POTUS for twenty years; she's blaming him for NK's rise, Iran, women getting harassed by Hollywood, etc.
She makes no sense here, I doubt she makes much sense over there.
You'd think Trump had ben POTUS for twenty years; she's blaming him for NK's rise, Iran, women getting harassed by Hollywood, etc.
She makes no sense here, I doubt she makes much sense over there.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 4:03 pm to Pigimus Prime
To say she has no skills as a politician is a understatement, she got to where she is riding her husbands coat tails, if not for him she couldn't have gotten herself elected to a local school board.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News