Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate investigation for being dishonest and unethical

This is sexism.

"As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.







Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.



Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigatio

Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.

The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception."

LINK

LINK

quote:

---

This topic debunked

---

Whole lot of opinion not backed up with facts in that debunking.

IOW typical Snopes

Trumpkins believe anything you tell them.

quote:

---

regularly posts from propaganda sites

---

Like Snopes?

Actually snopes is about 80%+ accurate, and veers off when protecting certain people...

Eta:

Here's what he actually said:

Zeifman has to fire her after the investigation

quote:

---

Washington Post

---

CIA pays Bezos $100M, you expect us to really care about their angle?

quote:

---

believing conspiratorial claims

---

I'm just believing that he fired them after the case...like he said...reprimanded and sat until the end

It's not conspiratorial, the CIA did pay the Bezos...and the contract was actually for much more...

Was she just never attractive? What was ole Wild Bill thinking?

How do these spurious stories keep making their way back to the poli......nvm.

This board has been overrun