Started By
Message

re: Having "The Conversation"

Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:49 am to
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34887 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:49 am to
So, CG...profiling - based on stats - is irrational? Unjust?

Not that it matters what either of us think. When push comes to shove...profiling WILL be the rule. Ask Janet Napolitano/Homeland Security.

Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:51 am to
quote:


I'm an old white guy who grew up in Mississippi but I also clearly remember my Dad having The Conversation with me. You don't talk back to cops, you treat them respectfully, you say yes sir and no sir... or they'll shoot you dead for looking at them wrong


Sorry you left off part of the conversation. FIFY
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67064 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:54 am to
or maybe, just maybe, this is an overreaction to an overreaction. The war on drugs created a war zone in our major cities. The police departments responded by going to war, treating the citizens in those areas like occupied peoples rather than their neighbors they had to protect.

Much of this mentality shift stemmed from the additional numbers of police needed to enforce these new drug laws, forcing police units to recruit people who didn't live in the cities they were policing. Instead of the beat walker being someone of the neighborhood, it was someone who lived elsewhere, who viewed the neighborhood as "hostile" and "dangerous".

The constant stream of police brutality, using police as revenue generators, no-knock raids, false accusations, corruption, poor emergency response times and murders by police created a culture of complete mistrust. These crime-riddled neighborhoods see these "occupiers" as intimidating, threatening, and completely unhelpful and only detrimental to their lives. Because the people don't trust the police, they don't testify to them or tip them off regarding criminal activity. Without this crucial information, solving crimes is much more difficult.

What we are seeing is a response to decades of poor policing. Is this response out of line? Absolutely, but it is not beyond comprehension. We have a real police problem, we have a real crime problem, we have a real entitlement problem, we have a real culture problem in America today. However, these problems are the result of poor policy, and the great thing about poor policy is that it is an opportunity. Poor policy can be changed! We have been given an opportunity to address the issues in our communities relating to drugs, crime, and the police state. By revisiting this issue and our police departments' approaches to crime, we can begin to erode and eliminate the kinds of mentalities that foster such destructive behaviors.
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9611 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:55 am to
On at least 2 occasions my son driving near a College campus was pulled over on very minor infractions. Once it was because he neglected to turn on the lights of his friend's car as he exited a parking lot. He was driving a drunk friend home.

The cops were actually looking for a DUIs. Didn't get it either time, but my son did get a nice hefty ticket for not having his lights on.

My son was polite and cooperative, didn't try to bum rush the cop, take the cop's gun or taunt him. He did what the cop told him to do.


He didn't get shot either time. Go figure.
Posted by NukemVol
Member since Jan 2010
1633 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:58 am to
I had a bad experience with cops on UT's campus. And no, I was doing nothing wrong. But my story didn't meet their preconception

I imagine that happens more often than this board gives credit. Is it as bad as the Ferguson's protesters make it out to be? Probably not. But it's out there. There are several documented cases of police brutality and racial injustice...this isn't unicorn spotting.
This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 8:59 am
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34887 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:12 am to
quote:

What we are seeing is a response to decades of poor policing


I disagree, KB. On a given night in the Hood...who murders who? It ain't the cops; it's heathen rogues who fight over the easy money in drug dealing. Given that...you want the Cops to just bail out and let the 'war lords' run *their* community? Hell, you're talking Mexico; just a matter of time before the beheading begin.

'An idle mind is the devil's workshop'. Getting a check in the mail, or worse - expecting a check in the mail as a moral duty of a just society - is a pernicious and destructive idea. Witness the consequences...and be damn glad for the Cops who try to sort out the rogues from what's left of the good folk. This is like Iraq; damn near impossible.

Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67064 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:28 am to
quote:

It ain't the cops; it's heathen rogues who fight over the easy money in drug dealing


If drugs were legal, drug dealers would be priced out of the market.
quote:

you want the Cops to just bail out and let the 'war lords' run *their* community?

Of course not. I want the private industry to run the the "drug lords" out of town. If you police the murders and violent crime rather than the ticky tacky drug users, inspection stickers, speed traps, and dui non-refusal checkpoints, then there would be more manpower to fight the cartels.

By keeping drugs illegal, you only empower the cartels by giving them a black market with which to finance themselves.

Who is financing these "thugs"? How do they feed themselves, have a roof over their heads, afford guns, ammunition, cars, alcohol, electronics, ect? The answer is government and drug cartels. The legal way to get money is difficult. It is much more lucrative for a teenager to deal drugs and live on federal assistance than it is to work for a living, that's a fact.

Until you cut off their source of money, their source of power, these criminals will be able to run rampant. However, the community PROTECTS these criminals from police because they do not trust them, with good reasons. Better the thug you know than the thug you don't know.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34887 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:37 am to
quote:

, the community PROTECTS these criminals from police because they do not trust them, with good reasons. Better the thug you know than the thug you don't know.


Pretty much agree, but for the above, KB. Book it...good folk in the Hood are like good Muslims in Muslim countries....they 'protect' the radicals because to rat them out would mean certain death. War lords, for all practical purposes.

Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67064 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

they 'protect' the radicals because to rat them out would mean certain death. War lords, for all practical purposes.


because the police have failed time and time again to protect witnesses and whistle-blowers. It's like being a QB behind an offensive line that doesn't (not to be confused with "can't") protect him. At some point, the QB is not going to trust that line and will begin to act accordingly.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50395 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Sometimes you're just screwed.


That guy was lucky. He got almost a mil out of the deal.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram