Started By
Message

Has anyone provided evidence that the 2020 was not rigged?

Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:02 pm
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
8927 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:02 pm
Maybe I missed the exhaustive report and bombshell evidence that the 2020 election was ran completely fair and Joe Biden legitimately won the election without any illegal activity involved. Please share, thanks!
Posted by LSUCap
Member since Apr 2023
1388 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:06 pm to
When the time is right, Space Force and DoD have the goods. Just have to wait till court.
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 5:07 pm
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
72391 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:11 pm to
Alt ^
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79471 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:13 pm to
The count said 81M and that’s all you need to know MAGA cuck!
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8331 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Maybe I missed the exhaustive report and bombshell evidence that the 2020 election was ran completely fair and Joe Biden legitimately won the election without any illegal activity involved. Please share, thanks!





Burdens of proof, how do those work?
Posted by UtDawg
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2023
323 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:15 pm to
I haven’t heard one pedocrat say he got 81 million
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
9247 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:15 pm to
They have not provided such evidence. Until recently, no one had judicial standing to really force the issue.

That is about to change.....
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41829 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:15 pm to
Burden of proof is on those that claim the election is rigged.

The problem is that leftists have fought tooth and nail to make sure full and accurate audits and fact-finding endeavors don't happen.
Posted by 1loyalbamafan
alabama
Member since Mar 2015
2691 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:20 pm to
The burden of proof is to show it was.

As obvious as it seemed, it's on the accuser to prove the accuazations.

I'm only sane because I know they're mostly crooks on each side. The longer the stay in power the more corrupt they seem to become.

The bureaucracy just gets larger as more and more unelected officials gain power to do the dirty work.
Posted by krs1190
Member since Aug 2023
250 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:22 pm to
I think the burden of proof is on the low iq dumbasses that believe it was.

And there has been no such proof.
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 5:25 pm
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
7977 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:23 pm to
This will never be settled until there's a complete and independent election audit.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69423 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:25 pm to
You cannot prove a negative


That’s a basic law of logic
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26918 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Has anyone provided evidence that the 2020 was not rigged?

No. Because that’s not how anything works.

You probably already know that though.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80480 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:27 pm to
Have you provided evidence that you don’t frick little boys in their assholes?

Please share, thanks!
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99531 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:28 pm to
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21837 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Has anyone provided evidence that the 2020 was not rigged?


Did you ask the same question before you accepted the 2016 results?

Of course you didn't. Because that's not how things work.
Posted by NCIS_76
Member since Jan 2021
5246 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:30 pm to
The cases were not "heard". If you get it, you get it. This is no where equality in our judiciary courts. That's how our judicial system works today. Our judicial system is party association by the Judge. You will see that in the next 20 years. Probably should see it now.
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 5:36 pm
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26918 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:31 pm to
Just imagine thinking that meaningless coincidental statistical trends in a different political era are somehow evidence of anything other than the political landscape changing.

ETA: Is the fact that California was a red state for most of its existence clear evidence that Bill Clinton committed fraud in the 1992 election? Just wondering.
This post was edited on 8/30/23 at 5:34 pm
Posted by bigblake
Member since Jun 2011
2502 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:32 pm to
Crazy that no one has posted any evidence of not-fraud.

However we have tons of evidence of fraud:
- Italian spy teams
- Dominion being hacked by Germans that support Merkel (she hates Trump)
- 81m votes
- Putin said so
- All those Trump lawyers and their court filings. Most have flipped and said they actually don’t believe there was fraud but we know they’re just bad bad people who can’t handle mean tweets.
- Tucker Carlson on TV (though he said he didn’t believe there was sufficient fraud in private)

Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26918 posts
Posted on 8/30/23 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

Last I heard that the cases would not be heard. Or they were, but YOU KNOW, not heard. That's how our judicial system works today. Our judicial system is party association by the Judge. You will see that in the next 20 years. Probably should see it now.

Let’s speak specifically.

What specific suit(s) are we talking about?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram