- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Harris v Sessions
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:09 pm
Who won?
Asked and not answered
You be the judge.
Sessions swore to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
He then claimed that a mysterious principle prevented from doing so.
Harris asked him to identify the legal basis upon which he was refusing to answer questions under oath.
And this little Keebler Elf looked like he was about to shite his pants.
Yes, the nation's foremost law enforcement officer could not think of a single legal basis to justify his actions.
It's absolutely shameful that the white, august caste of the Senate, with all their privilege and advantage, could not prevent this black woman from bitchslapping one of their own.
Look away, look away, Dixieland.
32
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:13 pm to crescentcity
McCain bailed him out.
I thought Harris was rude with Rosenstein, but I thought she was perfectly appropriate with Sessions.
I thought Harris was rude with Rosenstein, but I thought she was perfectly appropriate with Sessions.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:14 pm to crescentcity
She definitely tore his arse up. He got all "nervous". Squirming like he was on a hot seat. 
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:17 pm to Deke
that b**** needs to STFU, telling him he's trying to dodge the question but everytime he opens his mouth he gets cut off from speaking
This post was edited on 6/14/17 at 12:06 am
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:19 pm to crescentcity
quote:
He then claimed that a mysterious principle prevented from doing so.
Same principle as used by Holder and LoLo Lynch. Pot meet kettle, leftist.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:20 pm to crescentcity
Melt bitch!
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:20 pm to crescentcity
She kept interrupting him. She asked a question but had no interest in letting him answer. That's her go-to move...just trying to get a soundbite and make a name for herself.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:22 pm to crescentcity
I wish there was a different Harris up there. If it was Sam Harris taking on 19th century time traveler Jeff Sessions, then that would be an entertaining rape.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:23 pm to crescentcity
quote:WUT?
the nation's foremost law enforcement officer
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:25 pm to crescentcity
It is a really simple principle.
The questions being asked were not in writing and submitted ahead of time.
Sessions along with the Heads of Intel Agencies all declined to answer questions that had to do with conversations they had with the President.
They all declined for the same reason.
The President has the ability to claim or decline executive privilege for some or all of those conversations due to a constitutionally supported separation of powers.
The Senate then has the right to go to court and have some or all of those questions that they want answered adjudicated by the courts.
By not answering those questions they protected the presidents ability to still assert executive privilege if he so chooses or needs.
Of course every senator who asked already knew those questions wouldn't be answered. It has been done this way forever.
The questions being asked were not in writing and submitted ahead of time.
Sessions along with the Heads of Intel Agencies all declined to answer questions that had to do with conversations they had with the President.
They all declined for the same reason.
The President has the ability to claim or decline executive privilege for some or all of those conversations due to a constitutionally supported separation of powers.
The Senate then has the right to go to court and have some or all of those questions that they want answered adjudicated by the courts.
By not answering those questions they protected the presidents ability to still assert executive privilege if he so chooses or needs.
Of course every senator who asked already knew those questions wouldn't be answered. It has been done this way forever.
This post was edited on 6/13/17 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:28 pm to crescentcity
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:28 pm to crescentcity
it was all about sound bites, same old crap....
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:29 pm to crescentcity
Is she a "rock star" like Maxine Waters?
good God you frickers are dredging the bottom of the barrel.
good God you frickers are dredging the bottom of the barrel.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:29 pm to Bigtime92
quote:He deserved to get cut off even sooner.
She kept interrupting him. She asked a question but had no interest in letting him answer.
He was asked if he had discussions about Russia with the campaign. He said he could not recall but then started wandering into the collapse of the Soviet Union.
He was asked if he had meetings with Russian nationals and started talking about how he couldn't remember a conversation on the floor of the Republican Convention.
When the witness goes wildly off topic you have the right to reel them in.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:30 pm to crescentcity
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:31 pm to crescentcity
She talked over every answer Sessions tried to give to the point she had to be reprimanded by the Chair....AGAIN!
This is her tactic to appear strong and tough, but she came out looking petty, childish and a straight up bitch.
This is her tactic to appear strong and tough, but she came out looking petty, childish and a straight up bitch.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:32 pm to crescentcity
Maybe someone should ask Kamala where the 3.7 M in federal cash is at that she received.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:32 pm to crescentcity
Their committee should not be privy to every document or discussion they want. So he doesn't have to enact executive privilege or the 5th to desire reasonable privacy for something when they have proved no wrong doing. If they had one shred of evidence or probable cause that is one thing, but they do not. It is a witch hunt and nothing more.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:34 pm to crescentcity
quote:
Harris
Posted on 6/13/17 at 8:36 pm to crescentcity
The New York Times story, "Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contacts With Russian Intelligence," was published on Feb. 14.
Deal with it trollie
quote:
"That report by the New York Times was not true. Is that a fair statement?" Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, asked. "it was not true," Comey replied
Deal with it trollie
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News