Started By
Message

re: Global warming question for both sides....

Posted on 2/17/14 at 8:47 pm to
Posted by MagicCityBlazer
Member since Nov 2010
3686 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

Ozone layer isn't what it once was padna.



You are such a troll.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46508 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

Ozone layer isn't what it once was panda


Trollololololol
Posted by Urban OhiO
Columbus
Member since Jan 2014
611 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 8:53 pm to
And quite a successful one, you should see my work on the SECr.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123896 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 6:58 am to
quote:

Not I or the vast majority of scientists who study this field. Sounds like you've got everything figured out.
quote:

Upperaltiger06



From your link:
quote:

Similarly, at the end of the last Ice Age, 10,000 years ago, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere rose dramatically as temperatures warmed.
Causation or correlation?
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 7:35 am to
so, to get a little back on point...

why is it when a storm like Sandy hits New York, and it's the worst since xxxx year, do the liberal media and other ididots believe it was caused by climate change but the older was a natural occurrence?
Posted by Mindenfan
Minden
Member since Sep 2006
4786 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 8:39 am to
quote:

1 ton of coal burned produces 5,720 lbs. of CO2.
I don't think your numbers are right.
Posted by Upperaltiger06
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
3946 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 8:55 am to
1 pound of carbon combines with 2.667 pounds of oxygen to produce 3.667 pounds of carbon dioxide.....granted this is under ideal conditions.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 10:25 am to
quote:


SO my question is, what was the cause of the event in the past? Or Dems arguing that the climate change is actually a "returning to past" climate change? All of these events have a history of happening in the past. So why is today considered "change".




Whoa.

That's deeply vague.
Posted by rcocke2
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
1690 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 11:39 am to
quote:

SO my question is, what was the cause of the event in the past?


Impossible to come up with 'causality' for a very, very complex system such as the Earth's atmosphere. All who try are wasting their time.

quote:

Or Dems arguing that the climate change is actually a "returning to past" climate change?


Yes, their arguments around this issue are asinine.

The Democrats should take the position that businesses producing effluents, discharged to atmosphere, shall always have the 'burden-of-proof' on them. The bigger the point-source of pollution, the more harm it could possibly cause. IOW, 100 LB/HR pollution from one heater stack is much more of a concern than 1 LB/HR pollution from 100 individual point-sources.
Posted by AUin02
Member since Jan 2012
4281 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

It's like anything, 20% make the most noise.


Pareto was a dick.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram