#flatearthers please check in. NYPost editorial shits all over climate change

LINK

quote:

---

Oregon-based physicist Gordon Fulks sums it up well: “CO2 is said to be responsible for global warming that is not occurring, for accelerated sea-level rise that is not occurring, for net glacial and sea ice melt that is not occurring . . . and for increasing extreme weather that is not occurring.”

Consider:

• According to NASA satellites and all ground-based temperature measurements, global warming ceased in the late 1990s. This when CO2 levels have risen almost 10 percent since 1997. The post-1997 CO2 emissions represent an astonishing 30 percent of all human-related emissions since the Industrial Revolution began. That we’ve seen no warming contradicts all CO2-based climate models upon which global-warming concerns are founded.

• Rates of sea-level rise remain small and are even slowing, over recent decades averaging about 1 millimeter per year as measured by tide gauges and 2 to 3 mm/year as inferred from “adjusted” satellite data. Again, this is far less than what the alarmists suggested.

•Satellites also show that a greater area of Antarctic sea ice exists now than any time since space-based measurements began in 1979. In other words, the ice caps aren’t melting.

• A 2012 IPCC report concluded that there has been no significant increase in either the frequency or intensity of extreme weather events in the modern era. The NIPCC 2013 report concluded the same. Yes, Hurricane Sandy was devastating — but it’s not part of any new trend.

---

NOTE: Anyone who chooses to come into this thread and challenge the above must provide:

a) what the "global" temperature is supposed to be (NOT what it "should" be for humans to be comfortable, but what it actually would be in the absence of any "man contributed" CO2, and considering natural cyclical changes in "global" climate);

b) what the "global" CO2 atmospheric load is supposed to be without man's contribution (considering cyclical changes in atmospheric CO2 concentrations);

and,

c) whether the "global" temperature and CO2 concentrations have ever been higher than they are today.