Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Financial reporters are some of the best political reporters

Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:41 am
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:41 am
I'm listening to Varney and Co jumping up and down at how reasonable, objective and thorough he is. I feel the same about Maria B. In those instances where I'd normally be tempted to consume cable political news (something I try to do only sparingly), I may just start consuming even more financial news (something I already do daily). The benefits are that all major political stories will still be reported, you're receiving your news from people trained to be objective (the market is an all-powerful judge, after all, and is constantly judging you right or wrong, so you learn to be careful with your words) and you'll get the economic viewpoints that are sorely lacking from the political news stations, who prefer to talk about "click bait" type issues more than grown up issues.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123912 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Financial reporters are some of the best political reporters
I'd guess >90% of my TV news comes vis-a-vis CNBC and FBN.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89531 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:51 am to
Yeah - they still have ideological biases, but they deal more in actual facts and figures, and less in the emotional realm, so their reporting is refreshingly objective (relative to the MSM, particularly).
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:14 am to
Right, their quantitative underpinning forces them to call a spade a spade and balance all ideological positions against the economic realities.

For instance, if all you consume is political news, you may think Europe, with its universal health care, social safety net and public infrastructure spending is all America should aspire to be.

But if you're a financial market participant or financial news consumer, you realize much of Europe is functionally bankrupt or at least not far from sliding back into the abyss.

Varney had an incredible rant at the end of his first hour talking about just this topic, calling himself a "recovering European," and proclaiming in convincing fashion that the social welfare state is officially a failed European experiment, all while questioning how many American liberals are somehow incapable of comprehending this as they push for the same policies here.

It's the classic idealist-realist dichotomy. The more of a realist you are, the less of an idealist you become. And the more of an idealist you are, the less you can afford to deal in facts and numbers.

Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Financial reporters are some of the best political reporters

Want to know why? Bc 99% of them are conservative; Libs don't know shite about economics
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37631 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:15 am to
I typically read the WSJ and they are probably the most objective from a political viewpoint. Obviously not liberal but they don't subscribe to the Trump populist jingoism either.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112475 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:27 am to
I don't know. A story came out that jobless applications are the lowest since 1973. Bloomberg News said it was because of Columbus Day. The unemployment office was closed. Rush just read Bloomberg's news release.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28117 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:42 am to
I disagree a little bit. Financial news is pretty clickbaity, especially Bloomberg and more than occasionally WSJ.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:48 am to
Bloomberg is the weakest of the three (CNBC, Fox Biz, BB). There's no doubt about that. I don't listen to it at all on XM, but I watch it from time to time on TV. I struggle even naming a major BB TV personality.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98790 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Yeah - they still have ideological biases, but they deal more in actual facts and figures, and less in the emotional realm, so their reporting is refreshingly objective (relative to the MSM, particularly).
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 12:23 pm to
agreed

Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23189 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 12:31 pm to
I've seen that nonsense a number of times. Estimates are his inheritance was $30 mm in 1999.

Where the frick do they get that number from?
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28117 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 12:45 pm to
That's really a pretty stupid argument
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
7918 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 12:47 pm to
Financial news is the only news where I do more than scan the headlines...with only occasional exceptions.

quote:

the market is an all-powerful judge


It's the most equal playing field in the world. The market doesn't care if you are black, white, red, yellow, purple, green, cis, trans, straight, gay, lesbian, or any other LGBTQABCDEFGH...

Every day your choices are weighed and measured, and you make money or you don't.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Where the frick do they get that number from?


i think its partly from the loans Trump received from his dad over time for his businesses

over $100s of millions.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram