- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal scientist cooked climate change books ahead of Obama presentation
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:28 pm to Salmon
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:28 pm to Salmon
quote:
Thanks for confirming my point
You live in your own world, where whatever you nthink is real, is real.
How do you know I didn't read their replies...and most all other AGW catechisms?
Lets try the shoe on the other foot. Go read the Climategate documents...but I know you won't.
1
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:30 pm to Dale51
I've read all of the documents and emails
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:30 pm to Salmon
quote:Why not?
I don't know
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:31 pm to Jbird
Because that is impossible to prove
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:37 pm to Salmon
quote:
I've read all of the documents and emails
Where did you find fault in them? Which topics?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:39 pm to member12
Some people are clearly upset about this inconvenient article.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:42 pm to jeff5891
quote:
how are they fake?
Individual data points are neither here nor there. Science is quite specific and relies on one and only one methodology. Alter those standards by fudging an unknown element, and you can wear a white smock and project graphs on a screen all day..it doesn't matter, it's not science at that point,. So to answer your question, they are fake by virtue of manipulating data to nudge the conclusions in the direction that is beneficial to the research's continuation.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:44 pm to Dale51
I suppose attacking the source counts for debunking things these days.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:44 pm to Dale51
quote:
So to answer your question, they are fake by virtue of manipulating data to nudge the conclusions in the direction that is beneficial to the research's continuation.
Not what they did
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:46 pm to member12
quote:
I suppose attacking the source counts for debunking things these days.
No..not the source.. (whatever you mean by that)..the methodology.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:48 pm to crewdepoo
quote:
This proves GW is fake
Not really....but the attack and dismissal of the whistleblower does not surprise me.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:49 pm to Salmon
quote:
Not what they did
Regardless of your claim, it is obvious that you, in fact, did not read the CRU documents.
But maybe I'm wrong. Which communications, between which researchers did you find to be the most damning to the "skeptic" argument? Which topics and what methodologies?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:50 pm to Salmon
quote:Interesting isn't it called man made global warming?
Because that is impossible to prove
But you know we need to do something correct?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:51 pm to Dale51
I'm discussing the article in the OP
If you want to discuss the 2006 stuff, start another thread or wait till tomorrow
I don't have time to break that down
If you want to discuss the 2006 stuff, start another thread or wait till tomorrow
I don't have time to break that down
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:51 pm to Jbird
Why do you keep asking me leading questions?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 6:58 pm to Salmon
quote:
I'm discussing the article in the OP
If you want to discuss the 2006 stuff, start another thread or wait till tomorrow
I don't have time to break that down
Thanks for confirming my point
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:00 pm to Dale51
That doesn't make sense, Dale
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:01 pm to Salmon
quote:
This has been debunked 100 times
Out of curiosity.....how is the article in the OP debunked?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:04 pm to dewster
Like most fake news articles, they take something out of context and twist it to fit an agenda
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:05 pm to Salmon
quote:
Like most fake news articles, they take something out of context and twist it to fit an agenda
So I take it you can't debunk the article?
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News