Started By
Message

re: ESPN laying off over 100 on air employees

Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:13 pm to
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14513 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:13 pm to
Good screw 'em.

For reasons related and unrelated to politics
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423382 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:15 pm to
the ESPN-NBA deal is going to be so interesting to watch it unfold

salaries skyrocketed because of the new deal

ESPN may not be able to afford that new deal

if ESPN crumbles, does the NBA? can the NBA contract when decreased revenue hits after this deal ends?
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:17 pm to
Do they have enough white people left to cover that?
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20923 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:20 pm to
My guess is that the cable providers offered them a sweetheart deal vs them going the a la carte option like HBO did.

They chose networks and their bundles over getting subscribers independently and it cost them.

Good, I can get behind the free market at work.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:37 pm to
Millennials cant afford cars, houses or cable TV. That's why they are riding bikes, living in small apartments (or at their parents' house) and eschewing cable.

Remember, they are the first generation in American history to digress economically from their parents.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:40 pm to
These layoffs have been known for quite some time.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57343 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

I guess the BLM hour with mike and jemelle didn't get them the results they were hoping for.


This, and a whole hour on ESPN radio hyping Arian Foster's atheism.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:42 pm to
Or does the NBA set up their own streaming service and recapture those numbers. Does Netflix or Hulu try to make a splash by signing to stream the NBA in a big way?
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57343 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Millennials cant afford cars, houses or cable TV. That's why they are riding bikes, living in small apartments (or at their parents' house) and eschewing cable.



Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423382 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Or does the NBA set up their own streaming service and recapture those numbers.

uh

they've had this for years
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
8707 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:45 pm to
Sports Illustrated is running a list with the departeds' twitter feeds and updating as needed.

LINK
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:46 pm to
But it hasn't been what they are really trying to monetize. I'm talking about making the NBA streaming the primary way to watch the NBA.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423382 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

But it hasn't been what they are really trying to monetize. I'm talking about making the NBA streaming the primary way to watch the NBA.

make no mistake. if the NBA could have developed revenue streams via online that rivaled the ESPN contract, they would have done it already. why keep the middle man?
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:51 pm to
Streaming hasn't been ready yet, but that day is coming. There's a reason cord-cutting is still growing.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423382 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:53 pm to
once services like Watch ESPN crack down on multiple IP use, cord cutting takes a major hit
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:53 pm to
This seems more related to the absurd bubble in broadcast rights that places from Deadspin to the Ringer to (when it existed) Grantland wrote about.


Oh and the incredibly dumb talking heads business strategy that FS1 somehow doubled down on with even hotter takes.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Nah frick them all. they had Caitlyn Jenner on this week.


So did Tucker Carlson.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29316 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

make no mistake. if the NBA could have developed revenue streams via online that rivaled the ESPN contract, they would have done it already. why keep the middle man?


Although the man may have a point....didn't MLB partner up with SlingTV or PS Vue to offer MLB Network via the OTT service? I wonder if it would be financially beneficial for the NBA to do something similar with DirecTV Now....honestly OTT is about to blow up (even more than it already has) with Google (YouTube), Hulu, Verizon, etc entering the market.
Posted by Pankins
Flahrida
Member since Oct 2010
1189 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:55 pm to
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29316 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

once services like Watch ESPN crack down on multiple IP use, cord cutting takes a major hit


Most OTT services that give access to WatchESPN already have a stream limit right? I know DTVNow is a 2 stream limit....hell as far as I know the tier with ESPN is still a single stream on SlingTV.

ETA Or are you saying that they are only going to let me access WatchESPN from my home IP address....that would suck.
This post was edited on 4/26/17 at 1:58 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram