Started By
Message

re: Duckworth 'confident' she can work with Mattis

Posted on 1/11/17 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

WhiskeyPapa I may be reading this wrong, but it appears she did a shitty job as the head of Veterans Affairs, no?


The text said her audit reports were "typical' of the audits they did, but yeah it didn't sound awesome for sure.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 3:28 pm to
There is probably no doubt that she wouldn't be a senator if she were not in a wheel chair.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8003 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

I'd tighten that up to the relevant scope: Who in the Senate is qualified to discuss the subject?


Tom Cotton or Dan Sullivan

She's about as qualified as McCain or Tom Carper - knowledgable, but spending all your time on air-conditioned bases and going out on missions once a day in a helicopter is not the same as what the former two did...actual serve and led in combat units in war.

She also sucks as a Senator, as she's one of mine, but that's besides the point.
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 3:50 pm
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Tom Cotton or Dan Sullivan

She's about as qualified as McCain or Tom Carper - knowledgable, but spending all your time on air-conditioned bases and going out on missions once a day in a helicopter is not the same as what the former two did...actual serve and led in combat units in war.


You mean those senators are actually women?

To say that a woman who flew combat missions and was grievously wounded is not qualified to discuss women in combat is just cracked.

If your real position is that just being wounded shouldn't make you a senator, I get that.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 3:54 pm to
Being wounded, or a woman for that matter, doesn't make her qualified.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Being wounded, or a woman for that matter, doesn't make her qualified.


As what? A senator? Or SME on women in combat?

Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 3:58 pm to
Both. Next question
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

I don't like how she uses her combat wounds to justify her stance on women in combat. As if her being shot down in a helicopter gives her any fricking insight into the combat arms. She takes advantage of her injury to dupe the stupid American people and give credibility to a stance that will weaken the military and get good people killed. Credibility that's she hasn't earned and doesn't deserve.



/Thread


Women have no place in combat arms, and if people were honest, they would expand that policy to all uniformed services.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8003 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

You mean those senators are actually women?

To say that a woman who flew combat missions and was grievously wounded is not qualified to discuss women in combat is just cracked.

If your real position is that just being wounded shouldn't make you a senator, I get that.



Read more carefully. I didn't say she wasn't qualified.

I said there are others in the Senate who are more qualified than she is to speak on the subject. Actually being in a combat arms unit in a war zone is a better criterion than just being a woman who was a helicopter pilot. Those people better understand the circumstances, the environment, and the intangibles than she does.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146746 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 4:03 pm to
What does this article mean?

LINK

Sounds like they wanted a private Q and A and were waving his waiver in front of him so he said frick it I will go be questioned like everyone else in a hearing?
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80120 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

To say that a woman who flew combat missions


Col (I think) Campbell, who flew A-10s during the opening of OIF and flew for 2 hours in a plane that was so littered with AA and Small Arms fire that it barely held together when she landed would take exception to your referring to Duckworth flying "combat missions".

UH-60s fly in support of combat missions. AH-64s and A-10s fly missions to deliberately place rounds on target. That is a "combat mission".

Combat Missions are those in which the primary purpose of the executing unit is to close with and destroy the enemy. A Blackhawk is designed to transport, not to close with and destroy.
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 4:06 pm
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

To say that a woman who flew combat missions and was grievously wounded is not qualified to discuss women in combat is just cracked.


So if my infantry friend dies in a helicopter crash, is he an "expert" at army aviation operations?

gets in car wreck....



.... NASCAR driver?

Just trying to see how far we are willing to take this logic.

Perhaps she would better serve veterans by stumping for VA reform instead of running her suck about shite she has no clue about.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

UH-60s fly in support of combat missions. AH-64s and A-10s fly missions to deliberately place rounds on target. That is a "combat mission".


Not seeing your logic here. She did combat ops as a helicopter pilot. Just like my cook did combat ops as a machine gunner, or my medic did as a driver.

The argument again Duckworth is that she has no expertise on combat arms jobs and manning requirements. She very clearly conducted combat missions. UH60s and Kiowas conducted combat ops throughout all of OIF.
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 4:17 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

and if people were honest, they would expand that policy to all uniformed services.
Preach
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71662 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Why is she not qualified?


Finding herself in combat once, by chance, is different than serving in an infantry platoon.

quote:

Who is qualified to expound about women in combat?


Anyone can, but that doesn't mean it comes with any relevance.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:11 pm to
Why your girl vote against Mattis' waiver?
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Why your girl vote against Mattis' waiver?


She's a fricking politician I guess.

That surprised me. I guess he didn't threaten to kill her.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:18 pm to
Told you she sucked
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram