Started By
Message

re: Donald Trump now has liberals defending the F-35 Program

Posted on 12/23/16 at 9:46 am to
Posted by Port Royal
You Name It , I've Been There
Member since Nov 2016
1811 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 9:46 am to
quote:

All that extra pipes and plumbing and computers and stealth and shite ain't gonna fit on that old arse F18



you're showing a staggering amount of ignorance...perhaps you should Google F/A-18 E/F?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 9:47 am to
The BBC found a gold mine with that tard.
quote:

"It's been seeing the way that Trump's election has mobilised a lot of the far right and given them hope," she says, citing a rise in reports of hate crimes and neo-Nazi activity

quote:

As a transgender woman, she does not fear for her personal safety in the Californian city where she now lives but she says she knows people in rural areas "who woke up and found a bunch of swastikas and words like '****' and 'trannie' scrawled all over their building".
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25097 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 9:47 am to
Where people were explaining why Putin is considered a murderer.
Posted by WW
Member since Dec 2013
2283 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 9:48 am to
So much wrong with that article.
quote:

"It's been seeing the way that Trump's election has mobilised a lot of the far right and given them hope," she says, citing a rise in reports of hate crimes and neo-Nazi activity.


quote:

As a transgender woman, she does not fear for her personal safety in the Californian city where she now lives but she says she knows people in rural areas "who woke up and found a bunch of swastikas and words like '****' and 'trannie' scrawled all over their building".

She foresees a wide-ranging struggle between the Trump administration and the left over issues such as immigration and racial politics.

But won't buying a gun just increase tensions?
"Things are already escalating and they will continue to do so and me not engaging or being prepared to defend my friends by force... isn't going to stop people from being attacked or harassed," Clara says.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Where people were explaining why Putin is considered a murderer
Yup!
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 10:12 am to
A trio of Connecticut Democratic lawmakers is calling President-elect Donald Trump’s calls for finding an alternative to the F-35 a “total non-starter.”

“Any suggestion that there is a substitute for the F-35 is a total non-starter,” Reps. Joe Courtney, Rosa DeLauro and John Larson said in a statement Friday. “This is a program that has been vetted ad nauseum by the Pentagon, the Congress and independent experts. There is simply no aircraft in production today that can compare with the F-35’s advanced avionics, networked capabilities and integrated stealth.”

For example, Courtney, DeLauro and Larson’s home state of Connecticut is home to Pratt and Whitney, the company manufacturing the F-35's engine.

Courtney is on the House Armed Services Committee and is the ranking member of its Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee. Larson is a co-chair of the bipartisan F-35 Caucus. DeLauro is a member of the House Appropriations Committee.
This post was edited on 12/23/16 at 10:15 am
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105405 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 10:15 am to
Done
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15705 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Trump could cure cancer tomorrow, and the liberals would immediately be defending the rights of cancer cells..


This is so wrong yet so true...
Posted by Port Royal
You Name It , I've Been There
Member since Nov 2016
1811 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 10:25 am to
quote:

bipartisan F-35 Caucus


F-35 has to have a Caucus to protect it.
Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5343 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 10:37 am to
quote:

There is simply no aircraft in production today that can compare with the F-35’s advanced avionics, networked capabilities and integrated stealth.”



Too bad it doesn't outclass other fighters in attack capability and dog fightning. Scrapping a weapons program like the F35 over cost is not an unheard of idea. There have been numerous weapons programs that were cancelled because of cost and thebdeveloped technologies from the cancelled program were used in their replacement. The XMBT-70 that was cancelled then led to developing the M1 tank, the Seawolf which lessons learned and tech went to develop the Virginia class, etc. Nothing non starter about it.

Posted by ScoopAndScore
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2008
11960 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 10:57 am to
Liberals really have no foundational political stances, only to oppose whatever the Rs support.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 11:25 am to
The article says the F-35 is stealthy and the F-18 is not. True enough.

Jbird or somebody will know better than me, but being Stealthy is no longer and "end all" and "be all".

"The 1999 F-117A shootdown was an event that took place on 27 March 1999, during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, (Operation Allied Force, Operation Noble Anvil), when an Army of Yugoslavia unit used a S-125 Neva/Pechora to down a Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk stealth aircraft of the United States Air Force. The pilot ejected and was rescued by search and rescue forces.[1]

The U.S. Air Force F-117A was developed in the 1970s, entering service in 1983 and officially revealed in 1988.[2] It saw its first combat in 1989 over Panama, and was widely seen as one of the most advanced pieces of U.S. military equipment.[2] At the same time, Yugoslavian air defenses were seen as relatively obsolete.[2]



"Unknown to NATO, Yugoslav air defenses operators had found they could detect F-117s with their obsolete Soviet radars after some modifications.[3] In 2005, Colonel Zoltán Dani confirmed this in an interview, suggesting that those modifications involved using long wavelengths, which allowed them to detect the aircraft when the wheel well or bomb bay doors were open.[4] In addition, the Serbs had also intercepted and deciphered some NATO communications, and thus were able to deploy their anti-air batteries at positions best suited to intercept NATO planes.[4]

On 27 March 1999, the 3rd Battalion of the 250th Air Defence Missile Brigade of the Army of Yugoslavia, under the command of Colonel Dani, downed F-117 Air Force serial number 82-0806, callsign "Vega 31".[2][5]...Photographs show that the aircraft struck the ground at low speed in an inverted position, and that the airframe remained relatively intact.[1] Some pieces of the F-117's wreckage are preserved at the Serbian Museum of Aviation in Belgrade,[15] other pieces of wreckage were reportedly sent to Russia and China, to be used in developing anti-stealth technology.[16] The USAF retired the F-117 in 2008.[17]"

LINK

The point is that I don't know if the author of the article is really being honest about the whole idea of a Super F-18 being a good replacement for the F-35.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 11:33 am to
quote:

The article says the F-35 is stealthy and the F-18 is not. True enough. Jbird or somebody will know better than me, but being Stealthy is no longer and "end all" and "be all".
Well it's a little more complicated than merely being "invisible" to radar, one of the by products of stealth capabilities is the bad guys (F-117 shoot down) developed a tactic by which the used multiple radars from multiple locations to "paint" the stealth aircraft, soooo with the Harm shooters on station it is much easier to kill said radars in the earlier stages of a conflict.

Secondly if airborne (fighter) radars have a hard time finding you that means you in theory get into BVR (beyond visual range) missile position and shwack said bad guy.

Posted by johnnydrama
Possibly Trashy
Member since Feb 2010
8710 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 11:42 am to
quote:

you're showing a staggering amount of ignorance...perhaps you should Google F/A-18 E/F?

You're showing a staggering ignorance of sarcasm.
Posted by vodkacop
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2008
7853 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 2:36 pm to
LOL if that happened they did it on their own. False flag. Literally nothing to see here.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22526 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Trump has conservatives defending the KGB. Anything is possible.

The KGB was dissolved in 1991.
Posted by russellvillehog
Member since Apr 2016
9711 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

KGB


Has not existed since the ussr.
Posted by Tigerdev
Member since Feb 2013
12287 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 3:01 pm to
Ehh... Publicly attacking a defense acquisition program and sole source requesting an alternative proposal from a rival company is more my issue with it. And the issue of anyone on the right or left that knows a lick about defense tech acquisition.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

Well it's a little more complicated than merely being "invisible" to radar, one of the by products of stealth capabilities is the bad guys (F-117 shoot down) developed a tactic by which the used multiple radars from multiple locations to "paint" the stealth aircraft, soooo with the Harm shooters on station it is much easier to kill said radars in the earlier stages of a conflict.


Well, that speaks to my point in the sense that if the HARM shooters come in and kill the enemy radars, then you don't need stealth.


HARM - High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile. They fly down the enemy radar beams and -they- must shut down their signal or die.

Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/23/16 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

I don't see where this guy is a liberal other that you're upset that he dare challenge Trump's tweet.


I got on to challenge the use of the word liberal in this context.

upgrayedd handled it.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram