- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Does anyone else think the whole weed debate is stupid
Posted on 2/20/17 at 10:55 am
Posted on 2/20/17 at 10:55 am
No matter what side of this you sre on I think most sane people can agree that there are much bigger issues the POTUS should be worrying about and this should be left up to local government. And if you are someone who would vote for any candidate just because of their stance on weed, you are an imbecile.
This post was edited on 2/20/17 at 11:06 am
Posted on 2/20/17 at 10:57 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
if you are someone who would vote for any candidate just because of their stance on weed, you are an imbecile
this part is very true; however, this does not apply if two candidates are nearly identical with the exception of this issue.
now what is the point of your thread? What has POTUS MAGA stated on the issue that has you all up in arms?
Posted on 2/20/17 at 10:58 am to Midget Death Squad
Nothing I voted for him. I'm just tired of the weed debate it's dumb I could care if it's legal or not
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:01 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
whole seed debate
The better shite doesn't have these rolling around in the bottom of the baggies any longer, so I'm told.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:03 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
The better shite doesn't have these rolling around in the bottom of the baggies any longer, so I'm told.
It's true you're only gonna see seeds is if you're smoking that Mexican ditch weed.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:22 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
most sane people can agree that there are much bigger issues
Money spent policing it, is a major issue
People who legitimately need it for medicine but can't get a job because according to the federal government there is not any medical benefit. Is a major issue. Companies can still drug test for it at any time until the schedule 1 is lifted.
People doing hard time over having small amounts of marijuana is a major issue.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:24 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
And if you are someone who would vote for any candidate just because of their stance on weed, you are an imbecile.
Yeah. Why would I care about my candidate's stance on personal liberty? Waste of time.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:51 am to Aubie Spr96
So your saying regardless of any other policy you would vote for a candidate just because of his weed stance? Because that's what I said. Don't turn what I said into a straw man frickface
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:55 am to mindbreaker
1. No one is doing hard time for a small amount of pot anymore. It's a misdemeanor I'm most states. 2. A private company can drug test for whatever the frick they want. A lot of people get around drug test everyday. And I didn't say it was a non issue. Just that there are way bigger issues and this should be handled at the state level. Jesus the reading comprehension by some here is asinine
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:59 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
I think weed is a pretty big issue. It impacts crime, government spending, tax revenues, prison populations, etc.
Also, you're saying that laws should be left up to the states. Does that mean you want to remove federal laws around weed?
Also, you're saying that laws should be left up to the states. Does that mean you want to remove federal laws around weed?
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:01 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
My only issue is that there is a portion of weed advocates that use the whole medical benefit as "the" reason is should be legalized. Just be honest. You want it legalized because you want to get high. Don't hide behind various medical ailments, my favorite being "I have anxiety. I need it to calm me". I have anxiety too, but I just deal with it. Other than that, I have nothing against weed. Smoke yourself retarded, it won't bother me.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:02 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
Hawgnsincebirth55
If people can fricking decide what bathroom they want to use, people can decide how they want to get fricked up.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:04 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
It's a State's rights issue and it is slowly resolving self that way. The Constitution works.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:05 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
It's a representative issue.
The anti acience legislation of the past that led to it being classified as being as dangerous as cocaine and more dangerous than heroin should be modified.
The anti acience legislation of the past that led to it being classified as being as dangerous as cocaine and more dangerous than heroin should be modified.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:06 pm to Abadeebadaba
I agree... but if I agreed with someone on their economic and foreign policies the dealbreaker wouldn't be if he had a different stance on pot than I did
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:07 pm to cahoots
quote:
Does that mean you want to remove federal laws around weed?
The main problem with state regulation overstepping federal regulation - the same thing we now have with carrying firearms from state to state. It takes a Philly lawyer to keep up with what's what.
If I buy medical weed in Ark. and take it with me to La. while vacationing am I going to get popped for having it in my possession in case I get searched? It's a conundrum to say the least.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:08 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
My only issue is that there is a portion of weed advocates that use the whole medical benefit as "the" reason is should be legalized. Just be honest. You want it legalized because you want to get high. Don't hide behind various medical ailments, my favorite being "I have anxiety. I need it to calm me". I have anxiety too, but I just deal with it. Other than that, I have nothing against weed. Smoke yourself retarded, it won't bother me.
Do you think the govt operated on Honest ground when campaigning for its illegality? Should Nixon have been honest when starting the war on drugs and just admitted he wanted to go after hippies and blacks?
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:12 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
I agree... but if I agreed with someone on their economic and foreign policies the dealbreaker wouldn't be if he had a different stance on pot than I did
It shouldn't be. You vote for people who most align with you. Not everyone is going to want exactly what you want. Some people really care about pot reform and that influences their vote, not saying it is right but it is their vote in the long run. At the end of the day, the best president for you is you.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:14 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
1. No one is doing hard time for a small amount of pot anymore.
Not true it takes a quick google search to see you are wrong
quote:
2. A private company can drug test for whatever the frick they want. A lot of people get around drug test everyday.
If they are legitimately using it for medicine they shouldn't have to. Companies can't fire you for opiate painkillers if they are prescribed. A much more harmful drug.
quote:
And I didn't say it was a non issue.
No you said it wasn't a major issue I disagree. I've told you why and you spouted off a retort with out doing an ounce of research first.
quote:
this should be handled at the state level.
It's a federally schedule 1 drug meaning it can't be handled at the state level because federally law trumps (ha puns) any state law.
Yes someone's stance on marijuana effects how I vote because anyone against it proves to me they ignore progress and learning. Much has been discovered about health benefits people in real need of it and how its dangers were vastly overblown.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:19 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
Not true it takes a quick google search to see you are wrong
I'm with you on everything but this. People do not serve hard time for neglible amounts of pot, or even for trafficking. Those that do appear to do so usually plead in lieu of another felony.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News