Started By
Message
locked post

Does anyone else think the whole weed debate is stupid

Posted on 2/20/17 at 10:55 am
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16035 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 10:55 am
No matter what side of this you sre on I think most sane people can agree that there are much bigger issues the POTUS should be worrying about and this should be left up to local government. And if you are someone who would vote for any candidate just because of their stance on weed, you are an imbecile.
This post was edited on 2/20/17 at 11:06 am
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24540 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:

if you are someone who would vote for any candidate just because of their stance on weed, you are an imbecile



this part is very true; however, this does not apply if two candidates are nearly identical with the exception of this issue.

now what is the point of your thread? What has POTUS MAGA stated on the issue that has you all up in arms?
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16035 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 10:58 am to
Nothing I voted for him. I'm just tired of the weed debate it's dumb I could care if it's legal or not
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54207 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:01 am to
quote:

whole seed debate


The better shite doesn't have these rolling around in the bottom of the baggies any longer, so I'm told.
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
40038 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:03 am to
quote:

The better shite doesn't have these rolling around in the bottom of the baggies any longer, so I'm told.




It's true you're only gonna see seeds is if you're smoking that Mexican ditch weed.
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7637 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

most sane people can agree that there are much bigger issues


Money spent policing it, is a major issue

People who legitimately need it for medicine but can't get a job because according to the federal government there is not any medical benefit. Is a major issue. Companies can still drug test for it at any time until the schedule 1 is lifted.

People doing hard time over having small amounts of marijuana is a major issue.



Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41103 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:24 am to
quote:

And if you are someone who would vote for any candidate just because of their stance on weed, you are an imbecile.



Yeah. Why would I care about my candidate's stance on personal liberty? Waste of time.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16035 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:51 am to
So your saying regardless of any other policy you would vote for a candidate just because of his weed stance? Because that's what I said. Don't turn what I said into a straw man frickface
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16035 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:55 am to
1. No one is doing hard time for a small amount of pot anymore. It's a misdemeanor I'm most states. 2. A private company can drug test for whatever the frick they want. A lot of people get around drug test everyday. And I didn't say it was a non issue. Just that there are way bigger issues and this should be handled at the state level. Jesus the reading comprehension by some here is asinine
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:59 am to
I think weed is a pretty big issue. It impacts crime, government spending, tax revenues, prison populations, etc.

Also, you're saying that laws should be left up to the states. Does that mean you want to remove federal laws around weed?
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19040 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:01 pm to
My only issue is that there is a portion of weed advocates that use the whole medical benefit as "the" reason is should be legalized. Just be honest. You want it legalized because you want to get high. Don't hide behind various medical ailments, my favorite being "I have anxiety. I need it to calm me". I have anxiety too, but I just deal with it. Other than that, I have nothing against weed. Smoke yourself retarded, it won't bother me.
Posted by Abadeebadaba
LSU fan @ FSU
Member since Sep 2010
4983 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Hawgnsincebirth55


If people can fricking decide what bathroom they want to use, people can decide how they want to get fricked up.
Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
17319 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:04 pm to
It's a State's rights issue and it is slowly resolving self that way. The Constitution works.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22322 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:05 pm to
It's a representative issue.
The anti acience legislation of the past that led to it being classified as being as dangerous as cocaine and more dangerous than heroin should be modified.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16035 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:06 pm to
I agree... but if I agreed with someone on their economic and foreign policies the dealbreaker wouldn't be if he had a different stance on pot than I did
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54207 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Does that mean you want to remove federal laws around weed?


The main problem with state regulation overstepping federal regulation - the same thing we now have with carrying firearms from state to state. It takes a Philly lawyer to keep up with what's what.

If I buy medical weed in Ark. and take it with me to La. while vacationing am I going to get popped for having it in my possession in case I get searched? It's a conundrum to say the least.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22322 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

My only issue is that there is a portion of weed advocates that use the whole medical benefit as "the" reason is should be legalized. Just be honest. You want it legalized because you want to get high. Don't hide behind various medical ailments, my favorite being "I have anxiety. I need it to calm me". I have anxiety too, but I just deal with it. Other than that, I have nothing against weed. Smoke yourself retarded, it won't bother me.

Do you think the govt operated on Honest ground when campaigning for its illegality? Should Nixon have been honest when starting the war on drugs and just admitted he wanted to go after hippies and blacks?
Posted by Abadeebadaba
LSU fan @ FSU
Member since Sep 2010
4983 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I agree... but if I agreed with someone on their economic and foreign policies the dealbreaker wouldn't be if he had a different stance on pot than I did


It shouldn't be. You vote for people who most align with you. Not everyone is going to want exactly what you want. Some people really care about pot reform and that influences their vote, not saying it is right but it is their vote in the long run. At the end of the day, the best president for you is you.
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7637 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

1. No one is doing hard time for a small amount of pot anymore.


Not true it takes a quick google search to see you are wrong

quote:

2. A private company can drug test for whatever the frick they want. A lot of people get around drug test everyday.


If they are legitimately using it for medicine they shouldn't have to. Companies can't fire you for opiate painkillers if they are prescribed. A much more harmful drug.

quote:

And I didn't say it was a non issue.


No you said it wasn't a major issue I disagree. I've told you why and you spouted off a retort with out doing an ounce of research first.

quote:

this should be handled at the state level.


It's a federally schedule 1 drug meaning it can't be handled at the state level because federally law trumps (ha puns) any state law.

Yes someone's stance on marijuana effects how I vote because anyone against it proves to me they ignore progress and learning. Much has been discovered about health benefits people in real need of it and how its dangers were vastly overblown.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55446 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Not true it takes a quick google search to see you are wrong



I'm with you on everything but this. People do not serve hard time for neglible amounts of pot, or even for trafficking. Those that do appear to do so usually plead in lieu of another felony.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram