Do we have the right to a clean environment?

Decent environment, that doesn't seem subjective at all

quote:

---

Decent environment, that doesn't seem subjective at all

---

I'm sure that the Scumbag Democrat SCOTUS Justices would be more than happy to legislate the full meaning of it directly from the Bench.

quote:

---

Decent environment, that doesn't seem subjective at all

---

I think that it was poorly worded at best.

I do think water is a must. Nobody wants to live like the Aiel.

I believe dr. Walter block solved this riddle years ago.

You certainly do, in my opinion. Unfortunately, environmental litigation for things like air and water quality are extremely difficult to bring about in today's legal environment. There were a few court cases in the latter 19th century that basically ruled that economic productivity took primacy over individual property rights.

We have a right to life.

To the extent that an unclean environment threatens our capacity to live, there's an argument to be made

If you own property, you have the right to demand it be free of nuisances caused by neighbors. If our tort system worked as it was designed, we wouldn't need a federal environmental law regime, because it could be handled via class actions for nuisance.

Nuisance is used to enjoin a neighbor from doing things which prevent you from enjoying your property like burning tons of stuff, producing smoke, blasting loud noises all night long, or allowing toxic runoff to pollute your land.

Too subjective, would be a cluster frick.