- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Do federal judges get security briefings? If not, how in any sane world
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:16 pm
Would they know if a class of individuals should or should not be allowed into this country per the presidents' decision? Correct me if I'm wrong but this is scary water we are treading now. What is that saying... slippery slope?
2
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:16 pm to Cali 4 LSU
They aren't supposed to determine if something should or shouldn't happen. They should determine if it's legal. Dumb thread premise.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:20 pm to Cali 4 LSU
[url=https://l48i.imgup.net/C4RAn9oVcA7565.jpg] 
[/url]
Having trouble with the pic but this is a link to part of the ruling.
The government could have submitted confidential intel but didn't.
[/url] Having trouble with the pic but this is a link to part of the ruling.
The government could have submitted confidential intel but didn't.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:22 pm to Tiguar
Then answer this
If they have no clue about security issues. Isn't that the purpose of the EO?
quote:
if it's legal
If they have no clue about security issues. Isn't that the purpose of the EO?
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:23 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
The government could have submitted confidential intel but didn't.
Would that be a good idea? And can they do that since one needs to have security clearance to get the information to begin with?
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:28 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Federal judges can be authorized to review classified info. The DOJ has the burden to articulate it legally.
The doj failed to do BOTH.
The doj failed to do BOTH.
This post was edited on 2/9/17 at 10:29 pm
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:34 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Federal judges can be authorized to review classified info. The DOJ has the burden to articulate it legally. The doj failed to do BOTH.
Ok, gotcha. Thanks.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:50 pm to Cali 4 LSU
It's in footnote 8 of the decision. Our DOJ failed to do its job.
Trump should fire them. This was probably sabotage to favor Sally Yates.
Trump should fire them. This was probably sabotage to favor Sally Yates.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:55 pm to matthew25
quote:
It's in footnote 8 of the decision. Our DOJ failed to do its job.
Trump should fire them. This was probably sabotage to favor Sally Yates.
Look at the big brains on Brad!
Um, no. Trump fired someone who disagreed with him.
Are you saying he hired someone who disagreed with him?
Did he not vet the person he hired to do the job?
He hires the best people, the very best who always win. So much win.
Yemen has better vetting than this orange president clucker.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News