Started By
Message

re: Did anyone catch the Jon Stewart and Oreilly debate on white privilege?

Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:46 pm to
Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Yes, Jews and Asians have higher IQ's than whites.
i said superior.

Zach has to admit they are superior.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134962 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Lastly, it isn't my job to educate you nor do I feel any pressure to do so. This whole entitlement white culture of having to be spoon fed info is sad. Get off your azz and do some reading. Once you have then I might be inclined to get into a discussion. As of now, it is like talking to a dog. I know you can hear me, and you look cute when you cock your head appearing to be listening, but I'm not going to waste time.




Ok, I'll ask you this (since you're dodging my request). I have declared that I believe WP exists. What, in your eyes, is the next step for me to mitigate the damage?
Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

I bolded the last part because it's the part that seems to elude people who try to argue against white privilege by copy/pasting arguments against affirmative action and reenacting the Four Yorkshiremen sketch. The poorest, gayest, white cripple still has white privilege.


It is quite amazing how something so obvious can be missed.

I suggest they catch the Chris Rock routine on switching places.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424087 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Zach has to admit they are superior.

why does he have to admit they're superior when he was discussing IQ measurements?
Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

are you trying to make zach sound anti-zionist?


Nope.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134962 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Did you read your last sentence? Why would I waste time with someone who clearly displays a hostile attitude?


Watching you squirm is pretty entertaining. I'm simply asking for you to define WP and what we need to do to end it.
Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

you're mis-stating the discussion we don't want information spoon fed. we want actual operative definitions and examples instead of amorphous "shades of grey" that shift and destroy discussions


My response was to him. There was no we.

quote:

and then, you people do this. you hide behind perceived intellectual superiority because you refuse to use actual definitions


I haven't claimed intellectual superiority. This is more a case of the one eyed man.



Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Ok, I'll ask you this (since you're dodging my request). I have declared that I believe WP exists. What, in your eyes, is the next step for me to mitigate the damage?
How about discussing your revelation with those that don't think it exists.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71478 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:56 pm to
quote:


like what, exactly?


Race isn't an issue in my day to day activities. I never have to worry about Driving While Black or being followed around a store.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134962 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

How about discussing your revelation with those that don't think it exists.


Still waiting on an answer to my question. Can you not give me an answer as to what we need to do to mitigate the damages of white privilege?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424087 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

There was no we.

there is a we when my points on that very issue were ignored previously

plus there is a we when many lib-progs on this board refuse to have discussions with me and chirp in for drive bys or picking to mock the lowest-hanging fruit

quote:

I haven't claimed intellectual superiority

the above quote (by you) is just that

"you don't know the definitions of the words i'm using, therefore there is no use in discussing this with you"

it's a trick that lib-progs love to use when faced with having to use actual definitions
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:57 pm to
The idea that major evolutionary divergences have happened since the dawn of civ only a few thousand years ago is ludicrous. There is also no observable physical or physiological difference between a white brain, black brain, Asian brain, etc.

Thus, the discrepancy in IQ is due to cultural, familial, and developmental differences in the individuals. Sure, white privilege, too. Whatever.

How do we fix it?
Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Watching you squirm is pretty entertaining. I'm simply asking for you to define WP and what we need to do to end it.


Squirm?

Why would I ever try to define it when there are plenty of better sources that are out there? It is no different than gravity. I wouldn't attempt to define it when there are far better resources. What is sad is you are relying on me.

Who suggested that you had to end it? Could you find a post of mine where I put this burden on you? Or that ending it was an immediate goal?

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424087 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Race isn't an issue in my day to day activities.

that seems entirely dependent on the person and his/her biases and not a social/group issue

quote:

I never have to worry about Driving While Black or being followed around a store.

i assume you're white, have you ever been profiled in a black part of town? i have...often.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424087 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Why would I ever try to define it when there are plenty of better sources that are out there?

but different sources define it much differently. if you had a basic understanding of WP, you would understand this

quote:

What is sad is you are relying on me.

you're making assertions about the concept, which means you have a subjective definition that you're using. we want that

Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Still waiting on an answer to my question. Can you not give me an answer as to what we need to do to mitigate the damages of white privilege?
I just gave you an answer. Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean it wasn't given.

Or do you not think that discussing your revelation with non believers isn't helpful?
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71478 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:01 pm to
quote:


Thus, the discrepancy in IQ is due to cultural, familial, and developmental differences in the individuals. Sure, white privilege, too. Whatever.


True. Michael Oher's IQ was measured at 80 his freshman year of high school and 105 the summer after he graduated from Briarcrest. He wasn't inherently smarter when he took the second test. He's a person of average intellect who wasn't performing at potential in the Memphis public schools and the Tennessee child welfare system.

Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:07 pm to
I agree it exists as a concept. But you might as well call it "normal" privilege. Because the same thing exists in every other country for whatever the majority is, and to a higher degree than the USA, which is (by the way) the most diverse and tolerant country in the world. But there will always been some standard of normal. Children will always make fun of other children for being different. What is the plan? Just sounds like a lot of sociological bitching to me. Since it's mostly subtle subconscious cultural reactions, and not overt hate-filled racism. I don't even see the point of talking about it. Just seems divisive and counterproductive and angry and whiny
This post was edited on 10/19/14 at 5:10 pm
Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

i assume you're white, have you ever been profiled in a black part of town? i have...often.
You are seriously trying to compare being profiled in a black section of town to DWB?

I guess the freeways and highways are now white neighborhoods.

I suggest you look at the stats.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134962 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Why would I ever try to define it when there are plenty of better sources that are out there? It is no different than gravity. I wouldn't attempt to define it when there are far better resources. What is sad is you are relying on me.


You stated you knew the definition of white privilege and others did not, therefore you refused to have a discussion with them so you obviously know what it is. Why won't you tell me?
quote:

Could you find a post of mine where I put this burden on you?


I never claimed that it was my responsibility to end it nor did I suggest you said that. I was asking what I could do to end it. Do you know of any solutions?

quote:

Who suggested that you had to end it? Or that ending it was an immediate goal?

Well what, exactly, is the point of starting a giant movement like WP and not actually offering any solutions?
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram