Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Department of Justice loses trade case

Posted on 2/18/17 at 12:59 pm
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67940 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 12:59 pm
I guess Sessions was too late to try and save the government's case.



Court Rules the Snuggie is a Blanket, Not a Robe
quote:

A federal trade court ruled that a Snuggie is a blanket, not a robe, for tariff purposes.
The court ruled that the cozy, fleecy coverings aren’t considered to be “robes or priestly vestments” and shouldn’t be taxed at a higher rate, Bloomberg BNA reported.

The Justice Department argued that Snuggies are apparel and should be taxed higher than blankets, but their argument was struck down Friday by the Court of International Trade’s Judge Mark Barnett.


quote:

The DOJ insists that because the product has sleeves, it resembles “clerical or ecclesiastical garments and vestments” and “professional or scholastic gowns and robes.”

But Barnett sided with Allstar’s argument, saying that unlike gowns or robes, the Snuggie doesn’t have anything to seal up the open back. Barnett added that the sleeves merely keep the Snuggie from falling off its user while still allowing the user to use his or her hands to do things.

The judge’s decision means that importers bringing in the Snuggie as a blanket will need to pay 8.5 percent duty tax instead of 14.9 percent.
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31636 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 1:00 pm to
It's neither.
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17170 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

The Justice Department argued that Snuggies are apparel and should be taxed higher than blankets, but their argument was struck down Friday by the Court of International Trade’s Judge Mark Barnett.


If there's zero People of Wal Mart pics of customers shopping in even just one then it cannot be apparel.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 1:43 pm to
Thank heaven's this important question of our times has been answered.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422561 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 1:45 pm to
you know when people bring up "omg this guy sued the EPA and he's now running it" meme? most of those suits are over important issues like this
This post was edited on 2/18/17 at 1:45 pm
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61270 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Thank heaven's this important question of our times has been answered.


Seriously. What the hell is going on? The DOJ should never have to touch a case like this.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422561 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

The DOJ should never have to touch a case like this.

why not? it's a trade issue over federal taxation (tariffs)

this is exactly what the DOJ is mandated to do: represent the federal government
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

this is exactly what the DOJ is mandated to do: represent the federal government


Correct. I just filed it under, things that will have no bearing on my life.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 2:24 pm to
Was the lawsuit really worth it? Seems like just another case of a federal department telling a small or private business what to do without flexibility. I'm glad the govt lost but it's not what it should have come to.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99042 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 2:28 pm to
Hopefully Gorsuch gets confirmed before this important case makes it to the Supreme Court.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27262 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 2:35 pm to
Just another reason to dislike Obama: his administration persecuted the Snuggie.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Was the lawsuit really worth it? Seems like just another case of a federal department telling a small or private business what to do without flexibility. I'm glad the govt lost but it's not what it should have come to.


Jesus Christ stop parroting the uber-con bullshite.

It is a dispute about taxes. Exactly what the Federal Government should be trying to control. It was a gray area that needed clarification. IRS clarified. Importers of foreign Snuggies disagreed. DOJ defended the FEDGOV position in court. Court agreed with importers.

You know who lost? Taxpayers. We have to make up the difference.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 3:51 pm to
I find it stunning that our government 1. Is so fricking tedious that this case exists and 2. That some bureaucrat really thought some judge was going to rule a backless snuggie to be a garment just cause it had sleeves.

I mean, how the frick much money are we even talking about? Bureaucrats trying to justify their own existence
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

. It was a gray area that needed clarification. IRS clarified.
It takes a bureaucrat to think this was gray area
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 3:56 pm to
bullshite frivolous cases like this is why people hate government and especially democrats and their sue happy ways.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 2/18/17 at 3:56 pm to
Here is the question I have:

Why are robes taxed at one rate and blankets another?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram