- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Democrats Betray Bernie Sanders over Canadian Medicine Bill
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
My bad for not finishing a sentence? Got side tracked? But it was quite obvious what I was asking. You would rather argue semantics rather than answer the obvious question asked.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:Why would an independent need to caucus with anyone let alone vote lock step with them?
Who the hell else is he going to caucus with?
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:30 pm to beerJeep
quote:
But it was quite obvious what I was asking.
You could have been asking one thing or several.
To answer your question though, I don't think he was ever going to stay in the party unless he won but he left with a little more vigor than he otherwise would have
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 6:34 pm
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:30 pm to Jbird
quote:
Why would an independent need to caucus with anyone let alone vote lock step with them?
Pragmatism
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:He's suggested medicare "negotiating prices" for drugs. IMO that is a poor approach compared with 1st world price leveling, but that is his suggestion.
What will TRUMP do about it?!?
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:33 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He's suggested medicare "negotiating prices" for drugs. IMO that is a poor approach compared with 1st world price leveling, but that is his suggestion.
Progressive Democrats have advocated this for years but it won't happen because Big Pharma is against it.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:34 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
poor approach
From Trump?
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:36 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
To answer your question thought, I don't think he was ever going to stay in the party unless he won but he left with a little more vigor than he otherwise would have
But why? What do you think is the reasoning thhe left with more vigor than he otherwise would have? Surely it wasn't because the dems treated him like a king.
Come on. You know the reason why. We all do. It was because he was played. He was used like a pawn and thrown out like yesterday's trash.
Just be honest. Say he got fricked over and was on the blunt end of political corruption. He was nothing but a dog and pony show for the useful idiots.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:37 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Just be honest. Say he got fricked over and was on the blunt end of political corruption.
Why do I need to say this yet again?
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:38 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:From anyone.quote:From Trump?
poor approach
It is what it is.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:38 pm to volod
Cory Bee bought and paid for....
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:39 pm to Violent Tally
quote:Yep!
Cory Bee bought and paid for....
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:42 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Why do I need to say this yet again?
You don't need to. But to ignore it and act like it isn't true only hurts your already abysmal reputation. It's not like shitlery is gonna double tap suicide you for admitting it. She won't even know.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:48 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
He only joined to run for POTUS, he had been an independent forever before that.
So he's a disingenuous con man. Got it.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:50 pm to beerJeep
quote:oh we know...
Say he got fricked over and was on the blunt end of political corruption
let's focus on what Bernie DID get out of his deal with the devils...
millions and millions now know his name where they didn't before. he has a chance to shape the Democratic Party the way he wants, and the 2020 nominee will either be him, or have his seal of approval. the Hillary-Pelosi wing of conservative liberals lost with her.
let's be honest, Cory Booker needs to repent
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 6:53 pm
Posted on 1/16/17 at 6:54 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
2020 nominee will either be him,
Ain't gonna happen in 2020. And he ain't making it til 2024. This was his shot. Dude needs to just go play golf and hang out with strippers and enjoy life.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:03 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Ain't gonna happen in 2020.
idk. we'll see. if you were handicapping right now whom would it be?
it won't be Warren, that I can tell you right now
maybe it will be Kanye
Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:13 pm to chalmetteowl
I honestly couldn't even begin to say who might run in 8 years Haha. I'd just imagine that if I were the bernster, I'd rather be golfing and hanging out with strippers on a beach somewhere at that age.
I would vote for him simply to watch the world burn.
quote:
maybe it will be Kanye
I would vote for him simply to watch the world burn.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:33 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:If he were pragmatic he would now be caucusing with the Rs.
Why would an independent need to caucus with anyone let alone vote lock step with them?
Pragmatism
Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:45 pm to chalmetteowl
frick Bernie will be 79 in 2020
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News