- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/21/17 at 11:43 pm to MButterfly
It is funny how much of conspiracy theorists the progressives have become.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 11:51 pm to Scruffy
Yes it is
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:06 am to MButterfly
quote:
That's your news outlet CNN
Yea. I already posted that Wikileaks posted some useless, irrelevant RNC stuff for cover.
Do you really think the Russians didn't have the current domain name for the RNC ?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:07 am to Bullethead88
Comey.. "RNC was hacked. CNN reports..
Take it up with them
Take it up with them
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:10 am to Bullethead88
quote:Hey, Alex Jones, not everything is a conspiracy.
Yea. I already posted that Wikileaks posted some useless, irrelevant RNC stuff for cover.
Do you really think the Russians didn't have the current domain name for the RNC ?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:12 am to MButterfly
quote:
Comey.. "RNC was hacked. CNN reports..
Take it up with them
Again. Do you really think the Russians didn't have the current RNC domain name?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:14 am to Bullethead88
quote:
Again.
Take it up with the 17 IC agencies that say the RNC was hacked.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:24 am to TheArrogantCorndog
quote:
The issue with the RNC hacks was the hacker used the wrong (old) domain names... but they sure as shite tried... I guess the RNC has better IT guys
So you believe the Russian hackers didn't have the current domain name for thr RNC? Really?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:39 am to Bullethead88
Dude, you begging!
Ossoff, got you rattled AF, also?
Ossoff, got you rattled AF, also?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:01 am to Bullethead88
quote:
So you believe the Russian hackers didn't have the current domain name for thr RNC? Really?
Let me get this straight... you believe half of the report when it fits what you want to believe, and don't believe the other half when it doesn't fit what you want
Got it.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:06 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Ossoff, got you rattled AF, also?
Naw. Ossoff was a bumb a$$ with all his Hollywood connections stuff. Should have known that wouldn't fly in Georgia.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:10 am to TheArrogantCorndog
quote:
Let me get this straight... you believe half of the report when it fits what you want to believe, and don't believe the other half when it doesn't fit what you want
Got it.
OK, laughing jacka$$. Which half did I believe and which half did i not believe?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:14 am to Bullethead88
quote:
Man the dems were really unlucky that the Russians decided to hack their computer but not the repubs.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:19 am to TheArrogantCorndog
quote:
Man the dems were really unlucky that the Russians decided to hack their computer but not the repubs.
That was sarcasm.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:28 am to Bullethead88
The point stands... you believe half of the report, and don't believe the other half... And in specific detail, the part where the hackers/hacker used old RNC domain names, therefore they were not able to collect important RNC data... is that true or not?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:34 am to Jjdoc
Maybe there were no hacks ???? Really how do we know for sure? Where does that come from?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:36 am to Pussykat
quote:
Maybe there were no hacks ???? Really how do we know for sure? Where does that come from?
Pretty sure Wikileaks can answer that question.
Seriously? No hacks?
I don't think it was fair what they did Hillary 2 weeks before the election; but THERE WERE hacks.
I'm glad we all got to see them in time though.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:43 am to TheArrogantCorndog
quote:
The point stands... you believe half of the report, and don't believe the other half... And in specific detail, the part where the hackers/hacker used old RNC domain names, therefore they were not able to collect important RNC data... is that true or not?
I don't believe that the Russian did not have the current domain name of the RNC.
According to the report, they had the old one but not the current one. Does that sound even possible to you? How hard is getting the domain name for a Russian hacker?
Eta: As I posted before, Wikileaks released some old, useless RNC stuff. Probably from the old domain name.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 1:50 am
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:47 am to Bullethead88
quote:
According to the report, they had the old one but not the current one. Does that sound even possible to you? How hard is getting the domain name for a Russian hacker?
Yes, it does
So my previous point of you believing only the part of the report that suits your narrative, and discrediting the parts that don't fit your narrative, have been proven right
Thanks for playing, and goodnight
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News