- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: David Brooks of all people "gets" what happened with Google. Calls for CEO to resign.
Posted on 8/11/17 at 1:23 pm to NIH
Posted on 8/11/17 at 1:23 pm to NIH
I work in STEM (science/engineering) and 60% of my office is female.
The only sexism I see is that my boss doesn't like sending women to do field work.
The only sexism I see is that my boss doesn't like sending women to do field work.
0
Posted on 8/11/17 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Or as the warmists default to "something went wrong in the measurement".
well the response is simple: it was junk science and not valid
Posted on 8/11/17 at 1:37 pm to NIH
quote:People are trying so hard to avoid hiring women, that almost every recruiter that's advertised within our office has said "we can boost your woman and minority hiring numbers" as an enticement.
What sexism keeps women out of tech fields? Do tell.
Have also had clients ask if we can help them find what works to hire more women. We turned it down, tho. I dont' believe in enabling sexism.
Posted on 8/11/17 at 2:36 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Or as the warmists default to "something went wrong in the measurement".
Evolutionary psychology is just the most obvious example of science’s flaws.
Posted on 8/11/17 at 2:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Evolutionary psychology is just the most obvious example of science’s flaws.
What's funny is that in reading that column, it is somewhat apparent that she didn't even take the time to read Mr. Google's paper.
I mean frick. It's not THAT long!
And, she only responded to ONE point held in the paper which was not his primary point in the first place.
Given her level of education, what I just described can best be described as.........she's a liar.
I also note that while she mentions all the supposedly flawed science, she mentions no science that supports her view. She merely makes statements that are intended to be accepted as fact.
Posted on 8/11/17 at 2:54 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
She merely makes statements that are intended to be accepted as fact.
She's a leftist. Ideology IS fact.
ETA: Not so very different from the Catholic Church during the medieval era when you come right down to it.
This post was edited on 8/11/17 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 8/11/17 at 3:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
The author of that article just couldn't help herself, could she?
How is this relevant to the issue at hand? I thought we were debating men and women having evolved different types of proclivities
She also apparently fails to see the irony in denouncing Damore's science as "less objective than we'd like to believe,".....and then goes on to cite her own science to try and prove her points about sex discrimination.
Ohhh, so YOUR science is objective. But if it's science that you don't like, it's a product of the patriarchy.
quote:
Of course, this apparent inferiority never stopped Jefferson from repeatedly raping his wife’s half-sister, Sally Hemings, herself a product of rape.
How is this relevant to the issue at hand? I thought we were debating men and women having evolved different types of proclivities
She also apparently fails to see the irony in denouncing Damore's science as "less objective than we'd like to believe,".....and then goes on to cite her own science to try and prove her points about sex discrimination.
quote:
Last month, a study of women in astronomy and planetary science led by University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign professor Kathryn Clancy found that women of color especially suffer from hostile working environments. In June, I contributed to a Nature Astronomy feature on gender discrimination in astronomy. As someone on Twitter reminded me last week when I posted a new paper on particle physics, because the authors of the paper are women, based on the results of one featured study in that Nature Astronomy issue, we can expect 10 percent fewer citations.
Ohhh, so YOUR science is objective. But if it's science that you don't like, it's a product of the patriarchy.
This post was edited on 8/11/17 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 8/11/17 at 4:21 pm to UGATiger26
quote:
gender discrimination in astronomy.
She's supposedly a scientist, but this is what she's writing about. She sounds insufferable.
Posted on 8/11/17 at 7:26 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
I had a boss that made one of my female coworkers go to a strip club!
Thats a bold strategy .
Posted on 8/11/17 at 8:44 pm to Centinel
quote:Orthodoxy and dogma are not limited to religion.
ETA: Not so very different from the Catholic Church during the medieval era when you come right down to it.
And the secular versions treat heretics just as bad as the religious. In today's world... worse.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News