Started By
Message
locked post

Comey "There is no such thing as absolute privacy in America"

Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:51 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53472 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:51 pm
LINK


quote:

All of us have a reasonable expectation of privacy in our homes, in our cars, and in our devices. But it also means with good reason, in court, government through law enforcement can invade our private spaces,” Comey said. “Even our memories aren’t private. Any of us can be compelled to say what we saw. …

In appropriate circumstances, a judge can compel any of us to testify in court on those private communications.” “There is no such thing as absolute privacy in America,” Comey said, because “there is no place in America outside of judicial reach.”


BTW..


quote:

“You’re stuck with me for another 6 ½ years,”
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80267 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:52 pm to
Sounds like he's lecturing a political science class.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35498 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:52 pm to
I don't like him but he's not wrong. Privacy is dead.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108540 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:54 pm to
Why hasn't this a-hole been kicked to the curb yet? He's the most incompetent director in the Bureau's history.
Posted by Doosh606
The DC
Member since Apr 2008
3232 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:54 pm to
Someone needs to read him the 5th amendment.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
17927 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:55 pm to
I had hoped this mentality died with scalia...
Posted by Rakim
Member since Nov 2015
9954 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:55 pm to
NSA outsourced a lot of the things they were doing to CIA since Snowden. We aren't the only country with these capabilities.
Posted by TigerNAtux
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
17112 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:56 pm to
That's one arrogant MF'er.

After pride. The fall.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:59 pm to
This is the problem with the concept that we can trust these agencies to police themselves.

Their jobs are fundamentally at odds with freedom. They spend all day trying to figure out new ways to access information and then come up with justifications for it.

Frankly. They wouldn't be doing their jobs if they didn't.

But that imperative is exactly why you can't give them a fricking secret court and then rely on then to stay within reasonable parameters.

You might as well ask a wolf to hang out in a room full of sheep and follow rules for not eating them
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

Their jobs are fundamentally at odds with freedom. They spend all day trying to figure out new ways to access information and then come up with justifications for it.

Frankly. They wouldn't be doing their jobs if they didn't.

But that imperative is exactly why you can't give them a fricking secret court and then rely on then to stay within reasonable parameters.

You might as well ask a wolf to hang out in a room full of sheep and follow rules for not eating them


Exactly.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

I don't like him but he's not wrong. Privacy is dead.


No right is absolute but that doesn't mean Obama and the Dumocrats can make up an excuse to violate President Trump's right of privacy.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:04 pm to
Sounds like someone is establishing an out, when the investigation heats up

"A presidential candidate in this era, cant expect absolute privacy" anyone?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:05 pm to
What we've come up with in terms of having the IC effectively police itself is about like having a court system where the prosecutor is also tasked wroth the providing the defense.

Then being surprised the prosecutor cheats
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19348 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

In appropriate circumstances, a judge can compel any of us to testify in court on those private communications

5th amendment?
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

What we've come up with in terms of having the IC effectively police itself is about like having a court system where the prosecutor is also tasked wroth the providing the defense.

Then being surprised the prosecutor cheats


That's exactly right. It's absurd.

the key to all of this is scaling back the ICs scope of operations. That has to happen before any meaningful change will occur.
Posted by Reubaltaich
A nation under duress
Member since Jun 2006
4967 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:13 pm to
Yep, Comey is right.

The genie has been out of the bottle for a long long time.

The average US citizen has not had 'absolute privacy' for the last 40, maybe 50 years. Could even go further back than that.
Read up on some the spying techniques that were employed during WWII.

There are spy satellites that can read the numbers on your license plate from hundreds of miles in space.

I posted this on the Movie/TV board from the show 'Hunted':

EVERY piece of mail is scanned and put in a data base somewhere that is easily accessible by LE/Feds.

EVERY phone call, land-line and/or cell phone is easily traceable.

Last info I found on cell phones:

* There are over 300,000 cell towers in the USA, and another 600,000 'micro' sites nationwide.

*EVERY cell phone(burner phones included) 'pings' cell towers every 7 seconds, registering their location to within 150 feet.

* Your cell phone company keeps a record for EVERY search you make and EVERY web-page you visit. They keep this info on file for a year(if not longer).

* AT&T has location info back to the year 2008.

* Same for your ISP, they have EVERY e-mail, EVERY web site you have visited on file for a long time.

*Same for your bank and credit/debit cards. They have EVERY transaction you have on file.

* There are lots and lots of CCTVs EVERYWHERE that can be accessed by LE & the Feds very quickly.

The list goes on.

Bottom line, you are being watched & recorded, and this info is keep on you for a long time.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38787 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:18 pm to
Have to quit Facebook and message board lol
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

the key to all of this is scaling back the ICs scope of operations. That has to happen before any meaningful change will occur.



It's funny because in the late 70s early 80s, I was taught as a child about how awful the various surveillance states of the world were.

shite. If a Soviet KGB officer from 1980 traveled forward in time and met our IC, the KGB guy would go home and tell America to frick off with their judgmental attitudes!

Then, he'd tell his KGB how they aren't nearly ambitious enough!
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 8:21 pm to
Boom Shorty.

Two arguments:

1) Power corrupts based on how much power one gets.

2) The more power you have, the power you have to do good.

The truth there are more number ones than twos.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17040 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

“Even our memories aren’t private. Any of us can be compelled to say what we saw. …


This guy needs to resign for this comment alone. Has he not heard of the 5th amendment?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram