Started By
Message

re: Cake baker loses appeal... Must bake for all people

Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:34 pm to
Posted by GoBigOrange86
Meine sich're Zuflucht
Member since Jun 2008
14486 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Can you tell me what my wife is thinking?


Obligatory "let me roll over and ask her" joke.

Sorry, it was lame.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46555 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:34 pm to
About everything other than sex.
Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

I got thrown in jail because I didn't have my CPO (certified pest control operator) license up to date.
This is beyond insane, AKA, standard operating procedure for the government.
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9119 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:46 pm to
Yep. I wish there were a way to have every citizen own a business for one year. This oversized and out of control government would be chopped down to size in no time flat.

People would finally realize just how much of a burden government places on our economy.
This post was edited on 5/31/14 at 2:48 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112601 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

People would finally realize just how much of a burden government places on our economy.


True...reminds me of a quote by Ayn Rand, 1966:

"The majority of those who are loosely identified by the term “liberals” are afraid to let themselves discover that what they advocate is statism. They do not want to know or to admit that they are the champions of dictatorship and slavery."

Govt exists to grow itself. And that means ever increasing control over the lives of individuals.
Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Govt exists to grow itself.
This is why I laugh/sigh when I hear people stay stuff like, "Well, yeah, government is out of control now but if we just elect the right people, we can get government down to a reasonable size."
Posted by GoBigOrange86
Meine sich're Zuflucht
Member since Jun 2008
14486 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:54 pm to
I think one of the things lost in this discussion is just what value we're going to place on private property rights. People treat this as a "pro-gay vs anti-gay" issue when it really isn't the broader point. Refusing to bake a cake, as someone said, is not in and of itself hate. Harassment is a different story. But just where do we draw the line about how people can choose to use their own property? And who gets to draw that line? The government?

Good thing the government is noble and trustworthy or else that power might have the potential for abuse!

Why protect the ignorant by outlawing their ignorance? Let them display it for the world to see. They're the ones who will pay the price.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

fricking ridiculous... A private business should be able to choose who it wants to do business with.


Yep.

Some people don't understand that freedom includes freedom to do shite that you hate and think is disgusting.

These people are entitled, backwards hypocrites.

quote:

And this is coming from a pro-gay marriage person.


Me too.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

That was the argument used to have segregated sections of stores and to deny service to black people at hotels and restaurants.


A result of Jim Crow laws and a problem of gov't mind you.

That was public discrimination using tax dollars, this story is private action using no tax dollars.

Try again.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57379 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Obligatory "let me roll over and ask her" joke.

Sorry, it was lame.
Nah. I 'ed
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57379 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

About everything other than sex.
Posted by DevilDogTiger
RTWFY!
Member since Nov 2007
6365 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Funny how christians are fighting so hard for their right to hate. This is ironic from a religion supposedly based on love


Funny how liberals can use mental gymnastics so state that "preferring not to do business with" now equals "hate".
I prefer not to do business with my in-laws. They are rich and it would probably benefit me financially but I'd feel very uncomfortable doing so. Does that mean I hate them even though I love them?
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Aren't you also a states right person? These are local and state laws. I find it incredibly inconsistent that the same people who believe marriage should be decided by the state disagrees that the state (and city) shod be able to make their own laws on community standards.


State and local laws can, are and will be oppressive just like federal laws are. When they discriminate against property rights in a manner like this story, they need to be scrutinized. Just like federal laws violating property rights are scrutinized. When a law violates the constitution, no matter what level it's at, it's brought to attention and dealt with.

This isn't a good argument.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112601 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 4:26 pm to
The difference is that local and state officials require far fewer voters to remove them from office. That's why federal office holders act with such arrogance.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20887 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

That was the argument used to have segregated sections of stores and to deny service to black people at hotels and restaurants.


Freedom to contract is good.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34826 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 5:40 pm to
Remember when liberals would say shite like "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to my death your right to say it"?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58190 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 5:49 pm to
I've said this before and I don't know if it would be legal, but can't he simply call his bakery a bakery club and charge one dollar for membership. Then once it's private, deny membership to anyone he wants?
This post was edited on 5/31/14 at 5:50 pm
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71365 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 6:23 pm to
quote:


Hell its mentioned eight times in the bible you shouldnt eat shellfish. Yet I don't see anyone refusing to bake a cake for a cajun wedding.


You are either unaware that Jesus declared all foods clean, in which case you fail, or you know better but are being willfully dishonest, in which case you also fail.

quote:


If a woman walks in 6 months pregnant she didn't get refused for a wedding cake even though sex before marriage is wrong.


That doesn't invalidate the marriage. Maybe you should do your homework before posting.

Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99127 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 6:26 pm to
Wasn't there a little dust-up in the 1860s that had something to do with people being forced to provide labor? Damned sure "involuntary servitude" appears in the 13th Amendment.
This post was edited on 5/31/14 at 6:29 pm
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 5/31/14 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

You are either unaware that Jesus declared all foods clean, in which case you fail, or you know better but are being willfully dishonest, in which case you also fail.

Link? Or are you being willfully dishonest?

Jesus was a Jew. He didn't stop being a Jew.

quote:

That doesn't invalidate the marriage. Maybe you should do your homework before posting.

Now you're being willfully obtuse. His point was, if a Christian cannot service a gay wedding because sex between people of the same sex is a sin, then to be consistent, he must also deny service here because premarital sex is a sin.

But you knew that. You may not have known Jesus was a Jew and remained kosher, but you knew premarital sex was a sin.

Eta: a better analogy might be marriage where one or both was previously married. Jesus said that was an adultery and we know adultery is an abomination.

Thus to be a truly consistent Christian one cannot bake a cake at a wedding where at least one person was a divorcee. Unless his name is Revelator who apparently has been given a pass by Jesus. :-)
This post was edited on 5/31/14 at 6:37 pm
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram