- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bump Stocks Legality
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:39 pm
So I personally don't think there is any reason that an average gun enthusiast citizen needs a bump stock and would be okay with them being outlawed. However, my issue is that with any issue, if you give an inch to the liberals they will take a mile. Meaning the next thing you know they will make every single AR platform be like a the bastardized California version and all "high capacity" magazine will be outlawed. It is obvious how truly ignorant they are when their leader Tweets out statements, immediately after this horrific tragedy, that clearly shows she has absolutely no idea what she is talking about. Would the liberals be okay with banning bump stocks but leave it at that? Or are they hell bent that gun enthusiasts like myself will have to turn in their weapons that they deem military in nature?
22
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:41 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
So I personally don't think there is any reason that an average gun enthusiast citizen needs a bump stock and would be okay with them being outlawed.
Why? If you don't see a reason, don't buy one.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:41 pm to ABearsFanNMS
Frick that. I don't have any, but I should be able to buy one if I want it. Not going to happen.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:41 pm to ABearsFanNMS
Dude, a suppressor wasn't used in this attack and that's been their biggest talking point so far. These aren't rational people.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:44 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
needs
Still not about needs.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:45 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
Would the liberals be okay with banning bump stocks but leave it at that?
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:46 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
So I personally don't think there is any reason that an average gun enthusiast citizen needs a bump stock and would be okay with them being outlawed. However, my issue is that with any issue, if you give an inch to the liberals they will take a mile.
Give an inch... this is the problem on both sides.
Republicans generally want to ban late term abortions. Dems know that once it starts, in a few years all are banned.
Dems generally want to ban certain types of weapons. Republicans know that once it starts, in a few years more and more will be banned.
There are so many topics like these 2 which are generally recognized as the most divisive. Personally I would be okay with bans on certain types of assault rifles but I will also vote with the NRA because I know the shite will never end.
I am also for stopping late term abortions as a means of birth control but I will continue to be pro-choice because there is currently no reasonable alternative. It's either black or white and no in between on this subject.
This is the predicament we are in now. No one wants to give in so nothing positive gets done.
This post was edited on 10/3/17 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:46 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
I personally don't think there is any reason that an average gun enthusiast citizen needs a bump stock and would be okay with them being outlawed.
Good thing you don't speak for everyone.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:46 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:Rights aren't determined by perceived needs. Most people will never need to defend themselves to save their lives or the lives of others. Doesn't mean they shouldn't have the right to carry weapons in case they might need them.
So I personally don't think there is any reason that an average gun enthusiast citizen needs a bump stock and would be okay with them being outlawed
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:49 pm to ABearsFanNMS
The loons want a full out scary black gun ban.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:49 pm to Tridentds
quote:
nothing positive gets done.
Nothing needs to be done on this. It's nothing but an emotional response to an emotional situation. It is a fact that bad shite is going to happen in life. When it does you don't have to make legislation on it.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:50 pm to ABearsFanNMS
i will ask you the same question i asked for 8 years when Obama was president. who is going to take your guns? the federal gov doesn't have the balls to go door to door and confiscate guns from gun owners. if they did what idiot would follow that order.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:51 pm to ABearsFanNMS
So exactly how many bullets should an individual be allowed to shoot in a given time frame? Would liberals be happier if he shot less bullets but took the time to aim each one?
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:52 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
i will ask you the same question i asked for 8 years when Obama was president. who is going to take your guns? the federal gov doesn't have the balls to go door to door and confiscate guns from gun owners. if they did what idiot would follow that order.
This is stupid.
"I have mine. frick everyone else."
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:52 pm to Aristo
quote:
The loons want a full out scary black gun ban.
This is my thought as well. I have a SBR (Sig Sauer MPX) and several AR platforms. I have them to plink targets and maybe someday hunt with them. Funny how some people consider they have no valid use.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:53 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
So I personally don't think there is any reason that an average gun enthusiast citizen needs a bump stock
It's called the Bill of Rights...not the Bill of Needs.
This post was edited on 10/3/17 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:53 pm to ABearsFanNMS
I have a feeling the Dems are gonna want all legal modification accessories for AR's, AK's, and so on banned soon. Then of course, they won't stop there.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:53 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
So I personally don't think there is any reason that an average gun enthusiast citizen needs a bump stock and would be okay with them being outlawed.
Noone needs an AR. You are drawing the same arbitrary line based on your idea of what someone needs just like people who want to ban the AR platform outright.
You should really consider that.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:55 pm to FooManChoo
quote:What Constitutional right do you have to a bump stock?
Rights aren't determined by perceived needs
Posted on 10/3/17 at 3:55 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
So exactly how many bullets should an individual be allowed to shoot in a given time frame? Would liberals be happier if he shot less bullets but took the time to aim each one?
They have basically already done that in California with thier new version of the AR.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News