re: BOOM, New Climate Data Rigging Scandal Rocks US Govt.

Snows in south louisiana


GLOBAL WARMIN IS A BUNCHA LIBERAL SCIENCY CRAP!!!



It's a conspiracy yall

Oh, I am! Just so ashamed to be making a clown post in a clown thread


Sorry to piss on your conspiracy party

Not my conspiracy. Though I thought science encouraged questions. Your clown post attempts to patronize any questions. That is anti science. So yes. ...you should be ashamed. Clown

quote:

---

Sorry to piss on your conspiracy party

---

quote:

---

But if you'd be kind enough to disprove Henry's Law, and dependence of the Henry constant on Temperature, you certainly could persuade many of us that there is at least a chance AGW is real.

Care to take that on, big boy?

---

Same offer, Cal.

quote:

---

Snows in south louisiana


GLOBAL WARMIN IS A BUNCHA LIBERAL SCIENCY CRAP!!!

---

quote:

---

I find it pretty funny that there is a specific crowd that constantly denies global warming, evolution, and generally has a pretty bitter disposition toward anything "science".

---

If you need to build a straw man to debate the topic, then go right ahead. It's not logical to cite one storm as evidence of a climate pattern....and I don't see any posters actually trying to claim that.

That brings me to the most obvious example....Bloomberg's November 2012 cover.
LINK
Clearly that cover is designed to play on people with certain kinds of insecurities.

So...you can pretend that the AGW skeptics are all stupid and anti-science, or you can actually poke holes in their argument by citing facts. Doesn't look like you are interested in the latter.

Again. It's not my conspiracy and I don't have a dog in this hunt. However, your statement that something is "not even up for debate". Proves you to be anti-science. You patronize and belittle....yet accuse others of being insecure. Im no shrink....but I think they call that projection. Clown.

Sorry, but the fact that they keep changing the name and prescribe global wealth redistribution as the solution exposes the actual agenda.

RIP the Himalayan ice caps. Oh wait.

Does anyone want to explain this adjustment in past global temps?

LINK /
LINK /

quote:

---

Doctoring real-world temperature data is as much a part of the alarmist playbook as is calling skeptical scientists at Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, MIT, NASA, NOAA, etc., “anti-science.” Faced with the embarrassing fact that real-world temperature readings don’t show any U.S. warming during the past 80 years, the alarmists who oversee the collection and reporting of the data simply erase the actual readings and substitute their own desired readings in their place. If this shocks you, you are not alone.

The bureaucracy at NOAA and NASA who report the U.S. temperature data undertake what they term “correcting” the raw data. These corrections are not just one-time affairs, either. As time goes by, older temperature readings are systematically and repeatedly made cooler, and then cooler still, and then cooler still, while more recent temperature readings are made warmer, and then warmer still, and then warmer still.

---

Or was the narrative to deny and distort? Who wants to explain the adjustment?

quote:

---

but the fact that increased carbon emissions will in turn increase the earth's temperature due to the greenhouse effect is not even up for debate. So argue it all you want, it makes no difference.

---

WRONG!

Once again . . .

quote:

---

if you'd be kind enough to disprove Henry's Law, and dependence of the Henry constant on Temperature, you certainly could persuade many of us that there is at least a chance AGW is real.

Care to take that on?

---

quote:

---

Care to take that on?

---

You are anti-science and stupid. LINK

That seems to be the response. I'm still curious if anyone wants to explain the temperature adjustments.