re: Bombshell: Email proves Obama/Holder targeted Sharyl Attkisson

quote:

---

mmcgrath

---

Your ilk are the ones who ran Nixon out of town on a rail.

This guy makes Nixon look like an amateur, yet you'll defend him to the death.

The hypocrisy from the ends-justify-the-means types is staggering. But that's ok. What goes around, comes around.

quote:

---

The hypocrisy from the ends-justify-the-means types is staggering. But that's ok. What goes around, comes around.

---

MmcGrath and I realize something you don't. A society ain't gonna fundamentally transform itself. It takes action. Dissenters must be crushed or our Noble Endeavor could be at risk. And lol about you thinking this will "come around"...*guffaws loudly. Why the hell do you think we run the Media Apparatus in the first place ? They immunize us from scrutiny. We have them in our hip pocket precisely because we don't want this to "come back around". And anyhow, you Constitutional Martyrs are slaves to The Rule Of Law anyway. Your disposition won't allow you to take the steps we take on a daily basis. That's our inherent advantage. You restrain yourself. Fundamental Transformation is too BIG to restrain. We fight with knives while you wankers hold your breath really hard and hope we stop.

Bravo, sir.

And from this day forward 80% of poliboard posters will think this story is true and the media is protecting Obama.

quote:

---

IRS targeting conservative groups...yeah that happened

---

Lerner did

quote:

---

Fast and Furious coverup...yeah that happened
Benghazi coverup...yeah that happened

---

I don't think you know what that word means.

quote:

---

Lies about ACA to get it passed...yeah that happened

---

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.

quote:

---

Fox News Reporter targeted by DOJ...yeah that happened

---

The US govt can't track / prosecute leaks?

quote:

---

Attkisson harassed after unflattering story about admin...that would never happen, she is a lying conspiracy nut..

---

She is. Watch the video.

quote:

---

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA.

---

Did you know, in order to be compliant with Obamacare, my company had to change healthcare plans for all employees. I am not covered for maternity care. I am a 32 year old male.

As a result of paying higher deductibles, I must now pay out of pocket, for short term disability insurance. Something that was previously in my plan, that i now must pay out of pocket.

In summation, Rex, you are an idiot.

quote:

---

You would have let Nixon continue?

---

No. I don't condone corruption.

And therein lies the difference between you and I.

quote:

---

And from this day forward 80% of poliboard posters will think this story is true

---

Please tell us that part of the emails are true and what part is a lie...

quote:

---

No. And therein lies the difference between you and I.

---

Which is why we Fundamentalist Transformers can never lose . It's freaking BEAUTIFUL! We get to redefine SITUATIONAL ETHICS on a daily basis and you good-government rubes have a self-defeating intellectual-honesty mechanism built-in. You can't defeat us, but you will assist us in defeating you every single time. It's absolutely brilliant. You are SLAVES to The Rule Of Law, we just point at it and laugh.

Forward has never been so easy ....

quote:

---

Lerner did

---

And you agree that she was the head of the IRS, appointed by Obama and nothing happened to her as a result of her actions on behalf of the President, correct?

What inferences can we draw then? Either, A. The President directed her actions, or B. The President approves of her actions and would continue to, but for the political fallout from the exposure.

That's awfully flimsy ground on which to be standing on this issue.

quote:

---

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.

---

Which is fine if the law had been sold that way, honestly. They had to Gruber people to pass the bill. You don't see the inherent problem that people have with that?

quote:

---

The US govt can't track / prosecute leaks?

---

And I assume you take that position with regards to Nixon's actions following the Watergate break-in?

Also done by others with the President having plausible deniability... (Colson did it. Liddy did it, etc.)

quote:

---

I don't think you know what that word means.

---

We know what it means.


I see the quandry this guy has put y'all in - you seem intellectually honest and engaging at times - but defending the indefensible costs you credibility. You want to say Attkisson is crazy and that may be right. But she was targeted by these people to keep her from investigating them.

Of that I have little doubt. Now, what happens when a crazy person is really being targeted? Their paranoia amps up big time. But it does not make them magically "untargeted", now does it?