- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bill to let local governments conceal public records gains Louisiana House approval
Posted on 4/14/24 at 4:32 am
Posted on 4/14/24 at 4:32 am
quote:
Legislation to allow local governments conceal public records for economic development reasons advanced Thursday from the Louisiana House of Representatives.
House Bill 461, sponsored by Rep. Steven Jackson, D-Shreveport, passed in a 79-18 vote and will head to the Senate for consideration.
The bill would allow a city mayor, parish president or local government executive to declare any records confidential if they determine their public release “would have a detrimental effect” on an active business negotiation. It would also allow the company or person negotiating with the government to request confidentiality.
LINK /
Can anyone claim we have small-government conservative leadership with a straight face?
Posted on 4/14/24 at 5:35 am to 4cubbies
This is insane.
All government should have 100% transparency
When it doesn't, corruption will flourish.
See fbi and FOIA requests- they don't show a damn thing.
All government should have 100% transparency
When it doesn't, corruption will flourish.
See fbi and FOIA requests- they don't show a damn thing.
Posted on 4/14/24 at 6:35 am to ksayetiger
Just trust your government
Posted on 4/14/24 at 6:38 am to 4cubbies
The quicker you realize that most “republicans” iin Louisiana are really former democrats who changed parties so they can get elected, the quicker you understand why bills like this get passed
Posted on 4/14/24 at 7:34 am to 4cubbies
No incumbents that voted for this should be re-elected.
Posted on 4/14/24 at 7:51 am to 4cubbies
NO INCUMBENTS should be reelected at any level of government. NONE.
The system is 100% corrupt, broken and the same thieves that did it over the last 25 - 40 years keep being reelected. And not they suddenly have solutions to the crap they caused?
The system is 100% corrupt, broken and the same thieves that did it over the last 25 - 40 years keep being reelected. And not they suddenly have solutions to the crap they caused?
This post was edited on 4/14/24 at 8:04 am
Posted on 4/14/24 at 8:09 am to 4cubbies
Every that knows Jeff Landry knew this was coming. As AG, he personally sued a reporter that requested public documents per state law. The AG violated state law by not producing the records, until the judge hearing the case ordered Landry to produce them.
Just another sleazy politician that wants to serve the public but be exempt from the public records law. What is he wanting to hide and why?
Just another sleazy politician that wants to serve the public but be exempt from the public records law. What is he wanting to hide and why?
Posted on 4/14/24 at 8:47 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Legislation to allow local governments conceal public records
They wouldn't really be "public" records if they're concealed. Kind of defeats the whole point of calling them "public records".
quote:
for economic development reasons
Da fuq?
quote:
The bill would allow a city mayor, parish president or local government executive to declare any records confidential if they determine their public release “would have a detrimental effect” on an active business negotiation. It would also allow the company or person negotiating with the government to request confidentiality.
So much for a government of the people.
There's strong voices on both sides of the "carbon capture" business proposed up on NELA. This just feels like it's being proposed (at least in part) to shut down the naysayers so players up there can get in on the Green grift.
Posted on 4/14/24 at 8:52 am to Bard
The opportunities for abuse seem limitless.
What would a legitimate example of this look like?
What would a legitimate example of this look like?
Posted on 4/14/24 at 9:01 am to Slevin7
quote:
The opportunities for abuse seem limitless.
What would a legitimate example of this look like?
This was in the article. Looks like we already have examples of abuse by the port commissions
quote:
About five years ago, the Legislature enacted a similar bill that allows port commissions to keep their records for economic development reasons out of the public’s reach. Since then, it has become very difficult to get any records from the ports because they now claim everything is related to economic development, Sternberg said. He expects local governments will simply follow suit if Jackson’s bill becomes law.
This post was edited on 4/14/24 at 9:02 am
Posted on 4/14/24 at 9:22 am to Slevin7
quote:
What would a legitimate example of this look like?
Proprietary business information. The business's overall assets or business model.
ANYTHING related to the specific project (amount spent, local investment, jobs created, needed permits, footprint, etc) should be public.
Posted on 4/14/24 at 9:23 am to Bourre
quote:
Looks like we already have examples of abuse by the port commissions
Louisiana’s public hospital boards enjoy the some of the same luxuries.
Posted on 4/14/24 at 9:26 am to 4cubbies
If it's concealed, it isn't a public record
Posted on 4/14/24 at 9:53 am to Damone
Here's how our legislature voted:
LINK
ROLL CALL
The roll was called with the following result:
YEAS
Mr. Speaker
Adams
Bacala
Bamburg
Bayham
Beaullieu
Berault
Billings
Bourriaque
Boyd
Boyer
Brass
Braud
Brown
Bryant
Butler
Carpenter
Carrier
Carter, R.
Carter, W.
Carver
Chassion
Chenevert
Cox
Davis
Deshotel
Dewitt
Dickerson
Domangue
Echols
Farnum
Firment
Fisher
Fontenot
Freeman
Freiberg
Gadberry
Geymann
Glorioso
Green
Henry
Hilferty
Hughes
Jackson
Johnson, M.
Johnson, T.
Jordan
Kerner
Knox
LaCombe
LaFleur
Landry, J.
Landry, M.
Larvadain
Lyons
Mack
Marcelle
McFarland
McMahen
McMakin
Melerine
Mena
Moore
Muscarello
Myers
Newell
Orgeron
Romero
Selders
St. Blanc
Taylor
Thomas
Turner
Villio
Wiley
Wright
Wyble
Young
Zeringue
Total -- 79
NAYS
Amedee
Carlson
Crews
Edmonston
Egan
Emerson
Galle
Horton
McCormick
Owen
Riser
Schamerhorn
Schlegel
Stagni
Tarver
Thompson
Ventrella
Wilder
Total -- 18
ABSENT
Bagley
Coates
Hebert
Illg
Miller
Phelps
Walters
Willard
Total -- 8
LINK
ROLL CALL
The roll was called with the following result:
YEAS
Mr. Speaker
Adams
Bacala
Bamburg
Bayham
Beaullieu
Berault
Billings
Bourriaque
Boyd
Boyer
Brass
Braud
Brown
Bryant
Butler
Carpenter
Carrier
Carter, R.
Carter, W.
Carver
Chassion
Chenevert
Cox
Davis
Deshotel
Dewitt
Dickerson
Domangue
Echols
Farnum
Firment
Fisher
Fontenot
Freeman
Freiberg
Gadberry
Geymann
Glorioso
Green
Henry
Hilferty
Hughes
Jackson
Johnson, M.
Johnson, T.
Jordan
Kerner
Knox
LaCombe
LaFleur
Landry, J.
Landry, M.
Larvadain
Lyons
Mack
Marcelle
McFarland
McMahen
McMakin
Melerine
Mena
Moore
Muscarello
Myers
Newell
Orgeron
Romero
Selders
St. Blanc
Taylor
Thomas
Turner
Villio
Wiley
Wright
Wyble
Young
Zeringue
Total -- 79
NAYS
Amedee
Carlson
Crews
Edmonston
Egan
Emerson
Galle
Horton
McCormick
Owen
Riser
Schamerhorn
Schlegel
Stagni
Tarver
Thompson
Ventrella
Wilder
Total -- 18
ABSENT
Bagley
Coates
Hebert
Illg
Miller
Phelps
Walters
Willard
Total -- 8
This post was edited on 4/14/24 at 9:56 am
Posted on 4/14/24 at 3:54 pm to Slevin7
quote:
What would a legitimate example of this look like?
A legitimate example doesn’t exist.
Posted on 4/14/24 at 4:15 pm to 4cubbies
quote:I can see how this could be needed.
conceal public records for economic development reasons
A manufacturer or other commercial developer considering buying a large piece of property to build a facility on could approach the local government to test the water on possible grants, tax abatement opportunities, infrastructure improvements, permit processes, etc.
If word got out about the possible new industrial development, real estate prices in the affected area could skyrocket from real estate speculators and the developer might say screw it, I'm out of here.
I'd like to know how other states handle such confidentiality before I condemn it.
Posted on 4/14/24 at 5:54 pm to LSURussian
quote:are you sure other states do anything like this? Or are you waiting for someone else to research it for you?
I'd like to know how other states handle such confidentiality before I condemn it.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 9:09 am to 4cubbies
quote:No, that's why I said I'd like to know how other states handle this issue.
are you sure other states do anything like this?
quote:I don't care enough about it to research it.
Or are you waiting for someone else to research it for you?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News