- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Been 4 years since we struck down DOMA
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:29 pm to AggieDub14
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:29 pm to AggieDub14
quote:imo its more because they can't understand how somebody could live that lifestyle, so rather than accept it they fear it because its different, and act accordingly
But you have to call them freaks because you don't agree with them. Why is that?
1
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:30 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
Why is that?
Because of nature burh..
Hey stick you dick where ever you want but don't blow smoke up my arse about it being natural. Same for all the mentally defective people who think they are the opposite gender as their reproductive organs prove.
Nature aint perfect, now never did I suggest the defectives shouldn't be allowed life and liberty. I'm just pointing out the obvious truth. Contrary to you liberals BS, everyone is not a winner.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:31 pm to Machine
Kennedy is such a bigot. I can't believe he thinks that things like "love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family" should be limited to "two people". Polyamory marriages must be recognized.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:31 pm to the808bass
quote:
But most gay people don't want...
for some reason i get this gut feeling that you have no idea what the gay community wants
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:32 pm to Machine
quote:
imo its more because they can't understand how somebody could live that lifestyle, so rather than accept it they fear it because its different, and act accordingly
No I don't fear it, just like I don't fear someone with downs syndrome. I understand it's not their fault. Nature is not perfect.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:32 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:i imagine that's next. they're all consenting adults, so no problem here.
Polyamory marriages must be recognized.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:33 pm to Snipe
quote:sure thing guy
No I don't fear it, just like I don't fear someone with downs syndrome. I understand it's not their fault. Nature is not perfect.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:34 pm to Snipe
quote:which has zero to do with the constitution bruh
Because of nature burh..
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:35 pm to Machine
quote:This was not a concern.
have the queers made any of you get gay married yet?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:36 pm to Machine
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:38 pm to the808bass
quote:
And they don't want to be monogamous once they get married.
I think this is true of many heterosexuals. This is a weak arguing point, IMHO.
quote:
And they'd really like to completely reinvent what "marriage" means.
I impugn generally sincere motives to the mainstream gay activists and those that have gotten married under the change. But, politically, I would agree with you. There has been a (maybe not so) subtle "anti family" or "anti traditional family" bias in the American left since at least the 1960s. The excesses of the sexual revolution are Exhibit A. The "No Man in the House" Rule, as part of the "War on Poverty" is Exhibit B. The Gay Marriage Crusade is Exhibit C.
It manifests itself in strange ways - from the philosophy of "It Takes a Village" - the famous book that our current Pres..(whew - just realized again how big a bullet we dodged in November) - sorry, then First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton wrote, to the gay wedding cake kerfuffle, and now the transgender fracas. It does seem to be an assault on "conservatism" generally and the progressives seem to take the approach that the more damage the better.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:40 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
I think this is true of many heterosexuals. This is a weak arguing point, IMHO.
Eh. It's not just that they don't want to be monogamous. They are consensually non-monogamous. That's not normative for marriage. "But there's some people who mess around and other people who are in open marriages." Sure. And they're as rare as the gays who want to get married. We don't base the form on the shadow.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:41 pm to Machine
quote:
for some reason i get this gut feeling that you have no idea what the gay community wants
For some reason, you don't know but think I don't know.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:47 pm to Machine
Facile thread, bro. Congrats
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:54 pm to Machine
quote:And you still haven't found the man of your dreams.....
Been 4 years since we struck down DOMA
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:56 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
the foundation upon which western civilization is constructed.
Says who?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:58 pm to the808bass
quote:
Eh. It's not just that they don't want to be monogamous. They are consensually non-monogamous. That's not normative for marriage. "But there's some people who mess around and other people who are in open marriages." Sure. And they're as rare as the gays who want to get married. We don't base the form on the shadow.
i know quite a few gay married couples and they are all monogamous. Maybe the spouses cheat (IDK) but they are not open relationships.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:58 pm to Machine
quote:
my position was always to get rid of marriage altogether as far as the state is concerned
This was always my position.
I think it's hilarious that we have a policy in America(and everywhere really) that says, "oh, look, you found someone to marry...........you need a license for that..........give the state money".
It's absurd on its face.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 1:59 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Says who?
Certainly not the arrogant oligarchy of those who happen to be walking around at the moment. The cruel taskmistress of the course of human history shits on progressivism again.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 2:02 pm to Machine
quote:
my position was always to get rid of marriage altogether as far as the state is concerned. Civil unions for everybody.
Judge Judy makes a very good point in many cases between unmarried litigants. She explains that the law has one set of rules for couples who get married and another set for couples who don't. Otherwise, the courts would have to deal with quarreling idiots who were 'together' for 2 weeks but thought of it as a marriage and now have issues about their separation.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News