re: Avenatti Hit With More Unpaid Debt. Owes Dillanos Coffee CEO $110,000 for unpaid bills

quote:

---

With that much debt, he could run for governor of Georgia

---

I did not know about this. Thank you for pointing it out.

quote:

---

I also own several businesses. It is not uncommon for a personal guarantee to be required by suppliers. I don’t work with suppliers that require a personal harsher, but it isn’t uncommon in the business world.

---

For Christ’s sake, I obviously know this. Why else would I ask whether he gave a GUARANTY?

I operate my practice as a PC. I am not individually liable on debts for which I do NOT provide a guaranty.

Yes, I dislike Trump. I also dislike dishonest and half-assed reporting. I do not know whether this article has (1) affirmatively dishonest or (2) merely a half-assed excuse for reporting.

Do you honestly contend that a decent reporter would not have addressed these questions? Do you honestly contend that there is not a DISTINCT possibility that this article was written in this manner because the “source” is friendly to Trump?

For God’s sake, this Forum is absolutely infected with delusions of “false flags” against Trump, but you are willing to discount a rather obvious instance of biased reporting?

quote:

---

you honestly contend that a decent reporter would not have addressed these questions?

---

Avenatti is a credit risk. Not sure why the distinction of personal debt or entity debt is a big deal to you. It still shows Avenatti Has come creditor issues. Your complaint is petty.

quote:

---

It still shows Avenatti is a scumbag.

---

See, I will not argue this point. He certainly seems to be a shady character.

Why does it matter? Because the creditor MAY be seeking recovery from someone who MAY not owe the debt, because he is a celebrity who can be leveraged. That bothers me, even if the celebrity is scummy, because the creditor KNEW he was dealing with a business entity and not an individual.

But what bothered me most was simply the bad reporting and THEN an inaccurate summary of that reporting by the OP ... something THIS poster does with great regularity.

quote:

---

Where does the article say it's a publicly traded corporation, or even an LLC?

---

You are correct. This article does not address that point. It is relatively-common knowledge from prior reporting over the past months and years, except the “publicly-traded” language. I never said that.

quote:

---

Ah, there it is. All those words just to finally come out and say what you really wanted to say.

Next time, don't beat around the bush, just jump straight to the point.

---

Most of Hank’s posts that aren’t lecturing the rest of us can be distilled down to that one simple phrase: OrangeManBad.

About 1/4 of my posting is critical of Trump. I have never pretended otherwise.

I openly admit that I despise the man, several times per week.


On this forum, crappy and dishonest reporting which HELPS or favors Trump is not only tolerated, but actively repeated and accepted as absolute truth. That SHOULD bother everyone.

quote:

---

The article says that Avenatti owes money to a supplier for a corporation in which he is a shareholder. Shareholders are not normally liable for corporate debts, so I am asking whether he gave a personal guarantee.

---

It's been fairly well reported that he gave a personal guarantee when he bought out Tulley's. All you need do is Google, or DuckDuckGo, for pertinent facts pertaining to all of this.

quote:

---

As I understand this business entity, Avenatti owned the bulk of the shares in the “parent” company, and the parent company purchased all the beans for sale/delivery to individual stores. I do not understand him to have been the equivalent of the guy who owns a single Chik-Fil-A. He was more like Truman Cathy (on a much smaller scale, obviously). But you are reading too much into my post. Based upon my understanding, it does not seem likely that he is liable as the primary debtor. quote: Can you think of a scenario where avenatti would owe money to the supplier? Yes. The most likely is a personal guaranty. So, I ask again “Did he execute a guaranty?”. I have searched and cannot find anything about this dispute other than Daily Caller “reporting.” Or is it just POSSIBLE that a publication friendly to Trump wrote an article slanted against a Trump opponent?

---

I’m absolutely loving this long drawn out discussion of personal vs corporate liability to defend an already proven deadbeat ambulance chaser.

But a woman comes forth with a claim..only she don’t know when it happened.. where it happened.. who all was there when it happened.. and how she left.. has already been caught in a lie (afraid to fly) and levies it against a Supreme Court candidate.. she is completely credible.

The mental gymnastics are absolutely incredible.