- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Article - Focus The Pentagon On Warfighting, Not Kids’ Schools And Such
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:24 am
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:24 am
quote:
It’s time to focus the Pentagon on warfighting and get it out of the myriad auxiliary activities that distract it from its main purpose. Secretary Mattis made his position clear in his confirmation hearing: “[W]e have to stay focused on a military that is so lethal that on the battle field it will be the enemy’s longest day and worst day when they run into that force.” That commitment, combined with President Trump’s focus on management efficiencies and willingness to disrupt long-standing practices, opens a window of opportunity.
Many commentators have criticized the extensive skein of activities the military does that have nothing to do with fighting, but few get beyond the rhetorical stage. It’s hard. Refocusing the Pentagon and reducing support activities involves painful trade-offs and offending powerful interest groups. Those activities exist for a reason and boast passionate supporters.
Nevertheless, the time is ripe to consider major changes that have been discussed for years. To get a sense of the possibilities, let’s take a look at some options:
Close unneeded bases (Center for Strategic and International Studies, Center for New American Security, Cato Institute, and many others have suggested another round of BRAC). Fewer bases means fewer military personnel doing support activities (and fewer civilians overall). Another round of closures would save an estimated $2 billion to $3 billion per year, once fully implemented. The mechanics are easy. It is been done five times in the past; there is a clear process, an established need, and a track record of actual savings. However, Congress — eager to protect local communities and concerned about future force expansion — refused the Obama administration’s base closure proposals for the last four years running. Senator McCain, Rep. Adam Smith and others recently have signaled a willingness to consider base closures. The Pentagon should move aggressively to take advantage of the opening. This is the easiest and proven way to cut unneeded overhead. If you are not willing to do BRAC, you might as well stop thinking about savings.
Stop medical research unrelated to war fighting (as Senator McCain has argued). Because the Defense Department has deep pockets, Congress has charged it with doing medical research on a wide variety of conditions from breast cancer, to autism, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Collectively, this research costs about a billion dollars per year. These are real research needs but they are unrelated to war fighting. The research should be conducted by other parts of the federal government, for example, by the National Institutes of Health. Advocates will oppose any effort to shift funding, fearful it might be reduced in the process.
LINK
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:30 am to Wolfhound45
Amen - and stop using the military as a lab rat for social experiments.
For instance, if we cannot adequately kill the enemy without women on the front lines, there is absolutely no reason to even entertain the notion of putting women on the front lines.
Don't want love relationships in fox holes detracting from readiness to accomplish a mission? ===> don't put homosexuals and women in the foxholes.
And myriads of other bullshite.
For instance, if we cannot adequately kill the enemy without women on the front lines, there is absolutely no reason to even entertain the notion of putting women on the front lines.
Don't want love relationships in fox holes detracting from readiness to accomplish a mission? ===> don't put homosexuals and women in the foxholes.
And myriads of other bullshite.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:31 am to Wolfhound45
Its a good article but the Republicans are incapable of implementing these changes. Privatizing military medicine? Never.
Converting non-combat jobs to civilian? that is a good one. Conservatives reducing the military while increasing civilians... Hilarious.
Converting non-combat jobs to civilian? that is a good one. Conservatives reducing the military while increasing civilians... Hilarious.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:33 am to Tigerdev
quote:Breh, discuss the merits.
Tigerdev
I am a conservative and an Army officer with over thirty years of service. And I am in favor of many of these initiatives.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:33 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Senator McCain, Rep. Adam Smith and others recently have signaled a willingness to consider base closures.
McCain on the side of Democrats, what a shock!!!
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:34 am to Tigerdev
Even if one were to assume that's true, it's almost as if the military and its employees are funded by the government.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:35 am to PsychTiger
quote:
McCain on the side of Democrats, what a shock!!!
Not sure if serious
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:36 am to Lou Pai
Because I am always super serious.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:36 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Close unneeded bases
And retrofit some of them for holding illegals until they can be deported. Win/Win imo.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:38 am to Wolfhound45
I am telling you no conservative government will implement these changes. You are saying that has no merit?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 8:13 am to Tigerdev
Are you trying to say there are liberals who want to decrease defense spending?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 8:15 am to Tigerdev
My favorite part is the Republican meme about government being completely ineffective.. while fapping to the military
Posted on 2/21/17 at 10:06 am to Tigerdev
I am saying take the time to discuss the merits of the proposals. Save the partisanship for another thread.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 10:12 am to Wolfhound45
Its not partisanship. The article itself mentions that conservatives have already shot down many of these items. Its a fact.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 10:27 am to Tigerdev
Thanks for the great insights (as usual)
Posted on 2/21/17 at 1:55 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Wolfhound45
Excellent post, as usual. Sir, I hope you can stick it out long enough to become a GO. I've said that maybe 3 times in my life.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 1:56 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
I am telling you no conservative government will implement these changes. You are saying that has no merit?
No, he is saying you should address the merits of the argument he kindly pasted in the OP.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 2:07 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
quote:
Senator McCain, Rep. Adam Smith and others recently have signaled a willingness to consider base closures.
McCain on the side of Democrats, what a shock!!!
Hopefully any closures will be in Arizona.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 2:13 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
It’s time to focus the Pentagon on warfighting and get it out of the myriad auxiliary activities that distract it from its main purpose.
Sounds good, wont ever happen.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 2:19 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Congress has charged it with doing medical research on a wide variety of conditions from breast cancer, to autism, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.
Only in government is the CDC conducting gun control studies and the military is doing medical research.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News