- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another Obama, Clinton donor joins Mueller's legal team
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:17 am to Navytiger74
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:17 am to Navytiger74
NT what's up my man? Let me ask you, do you find it odd nary a single R is part of Honest Bob's merry band of dem witch hunters?
2
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:21 am to Navytiger74
quote:
The federal judge hearing the case, U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen, blasted Freeny and her colleagues for misleading him
You forgot to mention that part where the Federal Judge "blasted Freeny" for misleading him.
Why does a lawyer with a mark on her record for trying to mislead the court get hired to investigate her political enemy? Seems suspicious to me.
I do otherwise largely agree with your post. I do believe that Freeny could do good work, especially if Mueller is doing good work and is supervising her.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:21 am to AUsteriskPride
FEC records show that Freeny gave a lifetime total of $750. That doesn't exactly maker her a big-time player.
Are you suggesting that only all-star prosecutors who contributed money to Trump should be on Mueller's team?
That would be a very small team.
Are you suggesting that only all-star prosecutors who contributed money to Trump should be on Mueller's team?
That would be a very small team.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:22 am to Dale51
quote:Tweeting that his own AG (and earliest major supporter) should resign after calling him an idiot, demanding his resignation, and then rejecting it. Attacking the Senate a majority leader who engineered his only major legislative victory (SCOTUS appointment). Publicly berating a CoS, a four-star Marine, like he's some mailboy. Siding with foreign actors over his own agencies. Lately, implying that our British cousins knew enough to prevent Friday's attacks but did nothing.
Like what?
I'm actually embarrassed that I took the time to spell that out. There's too much to name. Surely you know that.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:22 am to Jbird
quote:
do you find it odd nary a single R is part of Honest Bob's merry band of dem witch hunters?
Wouldn't this be ironic if all this is a ruse by Mueller by appointing all these Dems knowing he doesn't have legal squat on Trump and at the end of the day Mueller's findings show no "evil" thus shutting up the Dems and never Trumpsters?
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:24 am to Jbird
quote:Hi, Jbird. Doing well. Wish you the same.
NT what's up my man? Let me ask you, do you find it odd nary a single R is part of Honest Bob's merry band of dem witch hunters?
Some whiteshoe GOP bros should apply. This train would really get rolling.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:32 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
His comment was directed to me.
The poor word choice was his.
He claimed no one was persecuting Trump. In a world where >90% of press coverage is negative, NT's claim is audacious!
I understand that. My post was directed at his comment to you.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:37 am to austintigerdad
quote:
That doesn't exactly maker her a big-time player.
No...but it does show where her political/ideological alliances are.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:38 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Some whiteshoe GOP bros should apply.
What are "whiteshoe GOP bros"?? How would a person identify one??
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 9:42 am
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:41 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Tweeting that his own AG (and earliest major supporter) should resign after calling him an idiot, demanding his resignation, and then rejecting it. Attacking the Senate a majority leader who engineered his only major legislative victory (SCOTUS appointment). Publicly berating a CoS, a four-star Marine, like he's some mailboy. Siding with foreign actors over his own agencies. Lately, implying that our British cousins knew enough to prevent Friday's attacks but did nothing.
So what? Which of those are factually inaccurate?
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:42 am to Navytiger74
quote:I don't think Honest Bob is posting on usajobs.gov
Some whiteshoe GOP bros should apply.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:00 am to Dale51
quote:You could google "whiteshoe" and go from there.
What are "whiteshoe GOP bros"?? How would a person identify one??
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:01 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Tweeting that his own AG (and earliest major supporter) should resign after calling him an idiot, demanding his resignation, and then rejecting it. Attacking the Senate a majority leader who engineered his only major legislative victory (SCOTUS appointment). Publicly berating a CoS, a four-star Marine, like he's some mailboy. Siding with foreign actors over his own agencies. Lately, implying that our British cousins knew enough to prevent Friday's attacks but did nothing.
I'm actually embarrassed that I took the time to spell that out. There's too much to name. Surely you know that.
What the frick does this have to do with the witch hunt?
nothing
God damn you people grasp at flimsier and flimsier straws
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:01 am to Navytiger74
quote:So now you believe the MSM tabloid news that he actually said this? President Trump was angered that AG Sessions recused himself. President Trump is not an ordinary President. His views are not kept under wrap like past Presidents. He is who he is, blunt and not a typical politician/POTUS.
Tweeting that his own AG (and earliest major supporter) should resign after calling him an idiot, demanding his resignation, and then rejecting it.
quote:So McConnell gets all the credit for Gorsuch? This is ridiculous, POTUS has -like many before him- teams of esteemed individuals that help him to chose a SCOTUS nominee. This was not some great feat of McConnell's. POTUS hired his wife and tried to embrace and reach out olive branches to the establishment and they have done nothing to support what POTUS was elected to do. How is this in any way honorable on McConnell or Ryan's part?
Attacking the Senate a majority leader who engineered his only major legislative victory (SCOTUS appointment).
quote:Link? What are you talking about? There is an entire article on Politico about Obama at war with his Generals. Somehow this was fine with you?
Publicly berating a CoS, a four-star Marine, like he's some mailboy.
quote:The deception of our CIA and spooks was exposed last week. The FISA court harangued POTUS Obamas abuses as the beast that it is. There is a deep State whether you believe it, or not. It seems you follow and support POTUS Obama's foreign policies and defended the Iran Deal as nuanced to the ninth degree. Trump seems to recognize that the Mayor of London has been tied to radical terrorists. POTUS sees London as insane. Repeating the same things, not cleaning up their mayor and expecting different results, no?
Siding with foreign actors over his own agencies. Lately, implying that our British cousins knew enough to prevent Friday's attacks but did nothing
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:05 am to gthog61
quote:Hey turbo, he asked me what "unprecedented" behaviors Trump exhibited that he "caught hell" for.
What the frick does this have to do with the witch hunt?
nothing
God damn you people grasp at flimsier and flimsier straws
If you can't follow the convo, go sit in the corner and pick your nose.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:06 am to Navytiger74
quote:
You could google "whiteshoe" and go from there.
Not asking for a deflection to a googled definition of a term..I asked for your definition and how it applies to your post. The more important question was "How does a person identify one?" How do you identify one??
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:12 am to Navytiger74
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:13 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Hey turbo, he asked me what "unprecedented" behaviors Trump exhibited that he "caught hell" for.
And you didn't do that. You just claimed that they are "unprecedented". Can you first establish that those types of criticisms are, in fact, "unprecedented"?
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:16 am to Dale51
quote:It's not that complicated. You can identify them by their educational and professional pedigree. Well maybe you couldn't.
Not asking for a deflection to a googled definition of a term..I asked for your definition and how it applies to your post. The more important question was "How does a person identify one?" How do you identify one??
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:21 am to Dale51
quote:Trump's behaviors are unprecedented. Those behaviors are what have elicited unusually critical coverage.
And you didn't do that. You just claimed that they are "unprecedented". Can you first establish that those types of criticisms are, in fact, "unprecedented"?
And it's a little difficult to prove that something is unprecedented. Finding examples of that which doesn't exist it tricky. It's much easier to prove that there are prior examples of behavior similar to Trump's and invalidate my argument, yes? You have my leave to do so.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News