- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: All we want is for the 6 contested States with election fraud allegations to be...
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:21 pm to CheEngineer
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:21 pm to CheEngineer
quote:That’s not the way it works. The one alleging the law was not followed, is tasked with timely bringing the claim, supporting it with evidence, and obtaining a judgement stating it. If that happened, show me the ruling.
I asked you to provide a ruling that stated that states followed their own election laws.
Courts don’t just going around handing out rulings proclaiming every time someone follows the law.
1
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:21 pm to Bulldogblitz
quote:
Are you one of the investigators in Georgia?
No, but I work with some of them.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:23 pm to WDE24
quote:
I asked you to provide a ruling that stated that states followed their own election laws.
That’s not the way it works. The one alleging the law was not followed, is tasked with timely bringing the claim, supporting it with evidence, and obtaining a judgement stating it. If that happened, show me the ruling.
Courts don’t just going around handing out rulings proclaiming every time someone follows the law.
You are late the conversation so........
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:24 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
Just because all of your post-election demands aren’t met does not mean you have been cheated.
So trust you, the Dems didn’t cheat...got it.
It is amazing that you are so invested in the scam that you have tossed aside any ties to integrity.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:25 pm to ApexTiger
there's no amount of committees or live tv or anything that will convince the doubters of anything unless the outcome is that trump wins. Any other outcome and you'll just say 'yeah but, deep state! scotus is compromise. live tv/media are liars' etc.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:25 pm to Dday63
quote:
No, but I work with some of them.
You must work with a large group if this was done thoroughly.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:26 pm to CheEngineer
quote:
You are late the conversation so.....
Wasn’t this what you asked for
quote:
You got a statement or link to something saying they followed the laws? Bet you don’t.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:30 pm to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:
there's no amount of committees or live tv or anything that will convince the doubters of anything unless the outcome is that trump wins. Any other outcome and you'll just say 'yeah but, deep state! scotus is compromise. live tv/media are liars' etc.
Nice deflection.
Now go though my post history if you like. You will find that I have been very consistent in my take on election integrity. Up to and including a legitimate Biden presidency.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:35 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
Arizona Citizens Investigation Discovers Thousands of Phantom Voters in State – Up to 30% of Addresses in Investigation Were Fraudulent
quote:
Among other things, Piton found one corner lot has 1,500 registered voters and the lot next to it has 1,000. It’s beyond suspicious that 2,500 voters are registered to such a small area of land.
LINK
Posted on 1/10/21 at 4:31 pm to Auburn1968
I think Trump’s legal team fricked up from the get go strategy wise, echo chamber yes men saying he was cheated, or straight up malpractice. I think it was a combination of all 3. Trump is no lawyer. He has to rely on those he hires and if they frick up then he loses on legal matters.
Then if they keep advising him he was cheated, that’s what he goes with.
You can also have the best case in the world but by not following proper procedure (time limits, standing, etc.) it can wind up costing you the win.
Question: Did Trump file suit when Secretary of States were modifying voting rules right when it was being done or did he wait for the results saying he lost and then filed suit?
Then if they keep advising him he was cheated, that’s what he goes with.
You can also have the best case in the world but by not following proper procedure (time limits, standing, etc.) it can wind up costing you the win.
Question: Did Trump file suit when Secretary of States were modifying voting rules right when it was being done or did he wait for the results saying he lost and then filed suit?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 4:52 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
ederal courts overwhelmingly dismissed the suit for lack of standing.
The lack of standing is utter horse manure. In a national election every citizen of the United States and all states have standing because we all have a huge stake in the outcome. Just admit it: the powers that be including the Supreme Court want President Trump out of power in spite of that fact that the election violated election law has clearly defined in the Constitution of the United States.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 4:53 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
Many suits have been heard by courts over the past 2 months and they have all been thrown out.
for bullshite lack of standing reasons
Posted on 1/10/21 at 4:53 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
We demand an election audit.
Your elected representatives didn’t. There is nothing left to do.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 4:54 pm to GurleyGirl
quote:
In a national election every citizen of the United States and all states have standing because we all have a huge stake in the outcome.
You can say that, and it sounds nice. But that is not how standing works.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 4:59 pm to Otto Scorzany
quote:
I think Trump’s legal team fricked up from the get go strategy wise, echo chamber yes men saying he was cheated, or straight up malpractice. I think it was a combination of all
Trump's lawyers are on record with the courts saying that they were not alleging fraud took place. They made statements about fraud to the public, but when they were in the courtrooms, and the judges point blank asked them if they are alleging fraud, they said no.
I guess his lawyers are part of the deep state??
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:13 pm to Concernednewguy7
quote:
Benghazi
Fast and furious
Weaponization of irs
Hillary’s emails
False FISA applications
Baseless impeachment
Stolen election and sworn affidavits
Vegas shooter
Plastic pipe bomber
COVID19
Iraqi WMD
Bubba Wallace
Jussie Smollet
Booker running for president
Bernie had a fair shot at the D nomination
Right wing white supremacist
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:08 pm to Dday63
quote:
No, but I work with some of them.
Ask them why they decided tell voters they were imagining the machines were locked this past Tuesday. I literally was handed a sheet of paper and told to do a write-in an hour after polls were open. My wife was given the same routine an hour later. Basically everyone in this county that voted on Tuesday before 10 was given this route. The response from "the investigation" was that none of those issues actually occurred.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:11 pm to Lincoln1
Non of them were heard by the courts. The important ones were thrown out due to procedural issues. Why would anyone not want to do a full forensic audit in TX, PA, NV, AZ, WI and MI. Hell just do it in the mail in and absentee. What would it hurt?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:28 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
Many suits have been heard by courts over the past 2 months and they have all been thrown out.
If we did what you say, you would just want another and another... The SC threw out one of the lawsuits as well.
All of them are crap with no substance.
False. Again.
Bunch of idiots on here.
Lawsuits were dismissed bc SC claimed they had no "standing".
I didnt have shite to do with evidence.
They didnt even peek at evidence.
How many times do we have to tell you intellectually challenged fricking retards this happened?
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:31 pm to blueboxer1119
quote:
False. Again.
Bunch of idiots on here.
Lawsuits were dismissed bc SC claimed they had no "standing".
I didnt have shite to do with evidence.
They didnt even peek at evidence.
How many times do we have to tell you intellectually challenged fricking retards this happened?
This is what happens when your mom gets box wine drunk every night of her pregnancy with you. Go look at the judge's rulings
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News