Started By
Message

re: A perfectly relevant question for Rand to ask Hillary ...

Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:57 pm to
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:57 pm to
Ms. Clinton, will you still staff, or see a need for, the bimbo eruption team if elected President?
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Not if you're looking at it the way Rand Paul is looking at it. He's not looking to be petty. He's looking to whittle away at the effectiveness of Bill Clinton.

Rand's primary goal is to win the election, which means that he has to attack in ways that won't drive up his negatives with people he's trying to sway. It seems that all some of you folks care about is riling up the base.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48282 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:18 pm to
Missed my point
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:22 pm to
You agreed with me the other day that Rand's primary purpose here is to drive a wedge between Hillary and Bill. Do you no longer believe this issue is suitable for that purpose? Has something changed? Why not try and neutralize Bill? He's almost coming off as sympathetic to Hillary/women, which is brilliant in my view.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Missed my point
What is it?
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:32 pm to
Ms Clinton, In 1993 your husband put you in charge of a commission to bring out radical healthcare legislation which swept the Democrats out of their 40 year control of the House. If you were elected, would you sign an executive order requiring all White House interns to take birth control pills to avoid any political embarrassments your husband may cause?
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

You agreed with me the other day that Rand's primary purpose here is to drive a wedge between Hillary and Bill. Do you no longer believe this issue is suitable for that purpose? Has something changed? Why not try and neutralize Bill? He's almost coming off as sympathetic to Hillary/women, which is brilliant in my view.

I think attacking Bill over Monica is relatively pain-free for him, but if he drags Hillary into it he will probably do more damage to himself than he does to Hillary. I don't think Rand is trying to be a kamikaze, he's trying to win the election.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:39 pm to
I can't stand Hillary. But it really seems to bother a lot of people on here that the 90s were great under Bill Clinton. If they weren't, Rand Paul wouldn't have to ask Hillary anything.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

think attacking Bill over Monica is relatively pain-free for him
By doing so he is able to neutralize the "War on Women", which makes it easier to take her task for anything and everything without it being a "war on women"
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

But it really seems to bother a lot of people on here that the 90s were great under Bill Clinton
Dot.com's and REPUBLICAN congress had nothing to do with it.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:45 pm to
Ms Clinton, since you blamed the accusations of your husband's womanizing on a "vast right-wing conspiracy," is there anything you can say that would assure US citizens you'd have a bigger handle on your perception of reality if elected? If you missed all the signs of your husband cheating on you over the years, is that what happened in your assessment of Benghazi?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162213 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Would you require, for instance, that all interns be male or females of a certain age?"

She was older than the age of consent

I honestly think it would be a terrible political move to try to attack Hillary on the basis of Bill's infidelity. That was what, 20 years ago? We have bigger issues to tackle now. If someone brings that up it will sound like they're desparate and have no solutions. It would be the political equivalent of McCain selecting Palin as his VP running mate.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:50 pm to
Mrs. Clinton, you have proved to the American people with what happened at Benghazi, you are not capable of answering that 3:00 am phone call.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 3:56 pm to
Sure. Whatever. That is exactly what I'm talking about. So the Republican Congress was responsible for the booming 90s. At least Bill stayed out of the way then, and just got blow jobs instead.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 4:02 pm to
Remove politics and think in terms of pure strategy. Does Paul have no move here whatsoever? Or does he have one, but it should be directed at Bill and Bill alone?
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Sure. Whatever. That is exactly what I'm talking about. So the Republican Congress was responsible for the booming 90s. At least Bill stayed out of the way then, and just got blow jobs instead.
You cannot sit there and give Clinton total credit for the 90's economy and budget surplus without recognizing there was a republican congress to keep him in check.

Obama had two years of total control. And not 1 fricking democrat will blame him for the economy, but you want to give Clinton credit for the 90's.
Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

She had nothing to do with that situation and frankly, she handled it well.




January 27, 1998:

"LAUER: Let me take you and your husband out of this for a second. Bill and Hillary Clinton aren’t involved in this story. If an American president had an adulterous liaison in the White House and lied to cover it up, should the American people ask for his resignation?
CLINTON: Well, they should certainly be concerned about it.
LAUER: Should they ask for his resignation?
CLINTON: Well, I think that—if all that were proven true, I think that would be a very serious offense. That is not going to be proven true. I think we’re going to find some other things. And I think that when all of this is put into context, and we really look at the people involved here, look at their motivations and look at their backgrounds, look at their past behavior, some folks are going to have a lot to answer for. "

Asked twice, directly, if the American people should ask for a President's resignation if he did what he was accused of having done, a question inviting a simple yes or no answer, Hillary did the two-step and danced around giving an answer. Had she really believed Bill was being honest with her and the American people the day before when he stood next to her and wagged his finger and denied it, she would have said "damn right I do". But she knew deep down it was likely true and that is why she squirreled out of answering, so it would not come back to bite her later.


" LAUER: So these charges came as big a shock to you as anyone?
CLINTON: And to my husband. I mean, he woke me up Wednesday morning and said, you’re not going to believe this, but—and I said, “What is this?” So yes, it came as a very big surprise.
LAUER: When he said “but,” he said “but” what?
CLINTON: But I want to tell you what’s in the newspapers. "

Bill laying the smooth on the Mrs., right there.

Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 4:19 pm to
I'm not a democrat. Obama sux. The country is in the tank. Under Clinton, we were rolling. Good for the congress, and good for Bill. Would take those days again, easily. It's OK to admit that.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 4:22 pm to
Remember, Bill's just a victim of an overly promiscuous 22 year old girl that laid it on him so strong he had no choice but to accept. I don't know who to feel more sorry for - him or Hillary.
Posted by vodkacop
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2008
7852 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

s Clinton, since you blamed the accusations of your husband's womanizing on a "vast right-wing conspiracy," is there anything you can say that would assure US citizens you'd have a bigger handle on your perception of reality if elected? If you missed all the signs of your husband cheating on you over the years, is that what happened in your assessment of Benghazi?



Now we cooking with grease. See how the progs shouted from the rooftops about Anne horse and Mitt giving some kid a haircut fifty years ago, all these liberals here spouted the same crap. It was OK to bring up a spouse and the past when it suited their needs and honestly, had zero to do with Mittens campaign. Zero. Now with Hil running and the old sexual predator himself campaigning for a woman in Kentucky, who has received plenty of money from womens right organizations, its strictly taboo for conservatives to call out the rapist and shouldn't call out Hilary for lying and saying it was just a vast right wing conspiracy. lol you hypocrites. But hey they are toeing the Hilary line by trying toblame Lewinsky. Good boys. Sit. lolol.





first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram