- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A message from Neil deGrasse Tyson to science deniers (Video)
Posted on 4/24/17 at 4:49 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 4/24/17 at 4:49 pm to FooManChoo
Exactly. If the DNA is of the fetus is identical to the DNA of the woman, then the fetus is part of that body. If the DNA of the fetus is different than the DNA of the woman, then the fetus is not part of the same body.
Science.
Science.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 4:50 pm to Haughton99
quote:
Because it's a political ploy to get pro life people to either say they are ok with some abortions or they look like crazies if they think the mom should have to carry to term in those cases. There's no decent answer for that question.
Actually, there is. What does the baby have to do with the rape?
Posted on 4/24/17 at 4:54 pm to Dale51
quote:
Actually, there is. What does the baby have to do with the rape?
You just helped prove my point. The fetus is the result of rape. You may think that it should be illegal to abort the result of that rape but you are in a very tiny minority in this country for good reason.
Not a good answer.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 4:55 pm to Dale51
quote:
By that, in part, I mean that the burden of proof is always on the claimant. You claim that the---so far undefined-- catastrophes, have been headed off by regulations. To ask for clarification does not validate a challenge to try and prove a negative.
You realize that your entire anti-climate science schtick is a logical fallacy/argument from ignorance, right?
Posted on 4/24/17 at 5:13 pm to Haughton99
quote:
You may think that it should be illegal to abort the result of that rape but you are in a very tiny minority in this country for good reason. Not a good answer.
Appeal to Popularity Fallacy. Not a good answer.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 5:16 pm to bmy
quote:
You realize that your entire anti-climate science schtick is a logical fallacy/argument from ignorance, right?
You're projecting again. You're ignoring the reality of the failure of the global warming anti science advocates to produce anything that has actually come to pass in the last half century. But maybe I'm missing something. Which of the "sky is falling" doom and fear predictions made by them has actually come true? Can you name any?
Posted on 4/24/17 at 6:24 pm to llfshoals
quote:
So it's your assertion most educated people cannot grasp logic or understand science?
No. Quite the opposite.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 6:26 pm to NC_Tigah
I don't see the issue. He was wrong. I pointed that out.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 6:28 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
I argue that it is. Who gets to break the tie?
I don't care if anyone breaks the tie, and that's the difference.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 6:29 pm to jeff5891
Scientific "facts" change quite frequently....especially in the field of astronomy.
Degrasse-Tyson is yet another smug elitist atheist that likes to think there is no God because his ego doesn't want to share his "intellectual accomplishments" with anyone else.
He's never impressed me, & looks like he smells of gholulash & cabbage
Degrasse-Tyson is yet another smug elitist atheist that likes to think there is no God because his ego doesn't want to share his "intellectual accomplishments" with anyone else.
He's never impressed me, & looks like he smells of gholulash & cabbage
Posted on 4/24/17 at 6:34 pm to jeff5891
quote:
when you have people who don't know much about science denying it and rising to power, it's a recipe for the complete dismantling of our democracy.
Well if the Sally Struthers of Science says so...
Posted on 4/24/17 at 6:39 pm to Argonaut
quote:
We can just remove the unwanted fetus and let it thrive on its own.
quote:Right.
I don't see the issue.
What is the difference between "just removing the unwanted fetus and letting it thrive on its own," vs normal delivery?
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:29 pm to NC_Tigah
For his point, time and the result.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 2:59 pm to Dale51
quote:
You're projecting again. You're ignoring the reality of the failure of the global warming anti science advocates to produce anything that has actually come to pass in the last half century. But maybe I'm missing something. Which of the "sky is falling" doom and fear predictions made by them has actually come true? Can you name any?
And now a straw man. Some climate scientists were wrong therefore they are all wrong
Posted on 4/25/17 at 3:05 pm to Dale51
quote:
Exactly. If the DNA is of the fetus is identical to the DNA of the woman, then the fetus is part of that body. If the DNA of the fetus is different than the DNA of the woman, then the fetus is not part of the same body.
Science.
So it would be legal to abort a clone?
Dumb.
Clone lives matter.
This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 3:06 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News