Started By
Message

re: 9+6 = ? "Our young learners might not be altogether comfortable..."

Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:38 am to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:38 am to
quote:

wrote memorization may be how you and i learned the first time, but it's not the "correct" way

Rote memorization is how learning occurs at its infancy. You don't teach a kid the concept of Base 10. You say, "1, 2, 3, 4, 5,..."
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39889 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:39 am to
quote:

I could understand the logic if you were told to look at the 9 first, see how many it takes to get to 10, and then break down the 6 based on that, but that's not what she did.


Prophet gets it.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62864 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:43 am to
My team won the Louisiana state math bowl in 5th grade on the back of my performance in the mental math section using this exact method.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39889 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Urban Common Core Version:

9 = black man's penis size

6 = White Man's penis size


You add them together, you get a large sex organ with a high credit rating and "privileges".

THAT will score you:

a 'Dime (10) piece' who will bring her own Fifth (5) of MD20/20.

10 + 5 = 15!!!


I'm comfortable with that!

BTW, my biggest problem with what she taught was how many times she said the word "comfortable".

WTF??
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70125 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:46 am to
quote:

wrote memorization


It's rote, not wrote, for future reference.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422047 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:47 am to
my apologies
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39889 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:48 am to
quote:

My team won the Louisiana state math bowl in 5th grade on the back of my performance in the mental math section using this exact method.


I get that the method works.. I do the same thing.

1- She taught it wrong
2- The whole segment shows she's geared towards coddling kids, their feelings and their self-esteem

Explain me this... we've taught to memorize 0 through 9 basic math addition and subtraction forever.

So since, say the year 1900 through year 2000, 100 Million kids have learned it in that method.

During that time, we gone to the moon, harnessed the atom, created the Internet, developed a theory of spacetime and stamped out several diseases including several horrific cancers... what was wrong with the old method?
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:48 am to
That is actually how I add.

This also prepares kids for binary, hex, base36, etc.
Posted by TigerStripes30
Alexandria, LA
Member since Dec 2011
6369 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:51 am to
frick the way she explains it is more confusing than just saying 9+6=15
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9606 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:57 am to
quote:

can do fairly complex calculations in my head and that is exactly the method I've used all my life. I'm glad to see it's been formalized.


But not everybody is as brilliant as you.



When teaching the basics, it's better to keep it simple, or you'll just end up intimidating the students who struggle.

All this is, is a dog and pony show, designed to enrich text book companies and consultants who will make a fortune holding seminars for local school boards and teachers.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62864 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 9:15 am to
Why are you assuming this is some new method for learning? Just because people are tying to the new buzzword common core doesn't mean the method is new. I was taught to do mental math like that, by my math teacher.

This method comes after counting to 10, which is done by age 3 these days.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18595 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 9:22 am to
That method has been around forever, interesting that the pro common core folks are publicizing the less controversial portions and not the shite storm they are really pushing
Posted by PacLSU
I have been a
Member since Sep 2003
3630 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 10:12 am to
quote:

I can do fairly complex calculations in my head and that is exactly the method I've used all my life. I'm glad to see it's been formalized.

+1
Posted by igoringa
South Mississippi
Member since Jun 2007
11875 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 10:13 am to
Yes these techniques and methods have been around forever but traditionally have been developed after a base memorization of math facts. Kids should not have to think to answer 9+6 in real life. More complex after that base I can understand but get the base first. Just like sight (site?) words - you just need to know them to function.
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30169 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 10:23 am to
quote:

go read my comments about deconstructing the symbols we use to denote numbers, and that will tell you why


I saw it, however, it's still inefficient.

9+6=15...boom done.

I can deconstruct larger, more complex math problems in my head just fine. I learned to do it when it was necessary.

I understand the concept of it. However, it just seems like an unnecessary/inefficient use of time early on for something so simplistic as single digit addition.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56010 posts
Posted on 9/7/14 at 11:34 am to
I know this thread has died and has been dead for a couple days but I want to resurrect it anyway.

I saw this story on my Facebook feed this morning and I wanted to comment.

First this math actually works. It is many times the way I do this. 7+6 , in my head I do (7+3) + (6-3) = 13. It is a good thing to do it this way. I'm fine with this.

Now this adding problem is no big deal but than I started to look into common core math and it started to PISS ME OFF.

LINK

this first video tries to explain a "better way" to subtract 87 from 243

typically we would do it this way
243
-87

Stack numbers.
Subtract 3 from 7 which gives you - 6
because you you have a negative number you must take 1 away from 4.
3-8 is -5.
Same way make 2 1.
gives you 156.
If I actually did that by hand I would take me 5 to 10 seconds.

Now the way common core does it.

you draw a number line. (takes 10 seconds)
mark the number you want to subtract by on the line.
mark the number that will get smaller on the line.
now round 87 up to 90 and mark how much you have to add
round up 90 to 100 and add how much you have to add.
add 100 to 100
add 43 to 200

add all of the numbers up that you added up when rounding

100
+43
+10
++3
____

now there are more steps to get this.

add 0+3+0+3 = 6
put that number down
add 0 + 1 + 4 = 5
put that number down before 6
move the 1 down in front of 56

you now have 156 which is your answer.

So the old and quick way took me 6 steps
The new way took me 11 steps.

Rules I must remember for subtracting

1) if the number I subtract by is bigger than the number that gets smaller, I must take away the top number on the next set. (for example 3-7 is less than 0 so you must take away a number from the 10th place in order to for it to work.
2) I must line up the numbers so that, the 1s line up with the 1s. The 10s line up with the 10s, etc.
3) now do simple subtraction.

Rules for new math.

1) I must round up to the 10ths place
2) than the 100th place.
3) I Must write down each time I round up
4) add 10s or 100s to make it to the other number
5) once you make it to the closet 0s number add what you have left.
6) take all of the numbers you use to add up to get to the other number and add them.
7) if two numbers add up to be bigger than 10, only put the single digit number down and put a 1 over the 10th place.
8) IF you carry a number you must add it into the next equation.

so 3 rules vs 8 rules.

I don't see how the new math is easier.

BTW the guy in the video is an idiot. It took him three tries to get a very basic math problem figured out.

Plus it isn't easy to remember 3 rules when subtracting. The new math doesn't take out basic math, it just adds more steps to apparently make it easier. Also if you an accountant and you have thousands of numbers to add up. Do you think that doing it the new way would help you keep your job?

Here is another example of what I just explained above.

LINK

A very easy subtraction problem, made complicated.

LINK

here is another video (slanted against it) trying to show why it is worse.

Now I understand what the teachers are trying to explain. They are trying to visualize it for students. Which is fine. This is where I have an issue. A 4th grader may not understand why he has to carry a 1 to the next set of numbers when you first show it to them. This may help them. Hopefully you only have to show that once or twice, once they understand the concept you simplify it so that it can be done quicker. Common core can help describe why we do it, and why things work the way we do. The old math is the efficient way to do things, just doesn't do a good job of explaining why it works that way.

last video I promise

this one pisses me off the most.

LINK

Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36761 posts
Posted on 9/7/14 at 11:43 am to
I'm pretty sure this isn't the day 1 addition lesson plan guys.

i do math this way. I would consider myself above average at math.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56010 posts
Posted on 9/7/14 at 11:47 am to
quote:

678 plus 517. In your head.























Okay now 680 plus 515.

Easier ain't it?



put that down on paper and do it

(678
+517

it is difficult to do this on the computer so I will explain how it is done by explaining exactly what I did

line up single digits double digits and triple digits.

add single digits

8+7=15
put down 5 carry the 1
1+7+1= 9
put down the 9 in front of the 5
6+5 = 11
put down 11 in front of 9 and 5
you get 1195

now the new math way.

678
517

round up to 680.
subtract 2 to 517 = 515
now round up to 700
subtract 20 from 515 = 495

now round 700 up to 1000
subtract 300 from 495= 300
now add 115 to to 1000 = 1115

That is a lot more complicated on a piece of paper. If we are dealing with powers of 10, than you can't add 680 to 515 or 495 to 700 because a 4th grader according to common core won't understand that Math.

Sure this helps you deal with things in your head, but why would you want to do triple digit addition equations in your head? In the real world when would you do that, when you could get out your phone or a piece of paper and add it up in a few seconds.

Common core math is stupid and more complicated than so called complicated math problems.
This post was edited on 9/7/14 at 11:53 am
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56010 posts
Posted on 9/7/14 at 11:52 am to
quote:

I'm pretty sure this isn't the day 1 addition lesson plan guys.

i do math this way. I would consider myself above average at math.



the problem is they are now requiring students to do it this common core way.

I have heard that if you do it the normal way you actually get points off.

So lets say you get a problem like this on a test.

subtract 97 from 435. The teacher requires common core math.

on the test you do this
435
-97
332

you hand it in and you get this back from the teacher.

X. This is the correct answer but you didn't solve it correctly.

I have heard reports that students who are 80 percentile on standardized testing are coming back with Cs, Ds, and Fs on report cards because they don't do common core Math. If a student struggles with the old way and figures a new way to do it. More power to him/her. But forcing a student to learn a new way to do math that takes more steps, is just wrong.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36761 posts
Posted on 9/7/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

If a student struggles with the old way and figures a new way to do it. More power to him/her. But forcing a student to learn a new way to do math that takes more steps, is just wrong.


I got points off on lots of assignments for not doing a problem the way I was taught in a class. That's been standard in education for a lot longer than the common core in my experience.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram