Started By
Message
locked post

95% Of Jon Ossof's Campaign Donations Are From Outside State Of Georgia

Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:32 pm
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45287 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:32 pm
Per AJC.

Ossof raised about $8.3M, 95% of which is from outside the state. The top 3 sources of his donations:

1) California
2) New York
3) Massachusetts

Only about 1% of his financial backing is from within the 6th district.

Karen Handel raised about $460K, 90% of which came from within Georgia.

Commentators say this campaign could become the most expensive House seat race in history as even more $ is expected to pour into Ossof's campaign from outside the state.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69306 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:33 pm to
I still don't understand why california business leaders are desperate for the dem to win here.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:35 pm to
I read this morning that only 2% of Joe Manchin's donations were from West Virginia.

Two fricking percent
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30557 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

california

quote:

desperate
quote:

to win


there is your answer
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:38 pm to
What if we had a law that prevented donations from outside your district?

I'm struggling to understand or find a negative consequence.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23193 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:41 pm to
quote:


I still don't understand why california business leaders are desperate for the dem to win here.


Seriously?
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142023 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:41 pm to
he's making an ossof himself
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41686 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:44 pm to
It's pretty simple, actually: Democrats are desperate for a win. A win in a red state is even better, but a win is needed to change the perception that the D's are losers and on the decline after this last election. This is just step one in climbing back up on the horse but it's a critical step. They need a win here.
Posted by John Gotti
Vestavia HIlls, AL
Member since Jul 2013
3370 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

I'm struggling to understand or find a negative consequence.



I assume the argument would be that minorities couldn't afford to run and whitey would run everything
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39498 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:51 pm to
We must not allow outside actors to influence our sacred election process.

-all democrats two weeks ago.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25125 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:56 pm to
Perhaps the greatest irony is that Ossof in his election night speech decried outside influence in the election.
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

I'm struggling to understand or find a negative consequence.


I'm guessing that you don't think Citizens United was a bad decision by the Supreme Court.

But now that PACs can be funded by the big boys and operate anywhere in any race they choose, you want to restrict donations that go to directly to the candidates.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112495 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 2:15 pm to
And the odd thing is that Ossof is making speeches about defeating 'the special interests'.
Posted by TheRodFather
Member since Sep 2014
619 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 2:17 pm to
That's what I call grassroots
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

bamarep


Aren't you a proponent of the Citizens United ruling?

I'm sure you were beating your chest when Gorsuch got confirmed.

Do you not understand the implications of your own political viewpoints?
Posted by TheRodFather
Member since Sep 2014
619 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

's pretty simple, actually: Democrats are desperate for a win. A win in a red state is even better, but a win is needed to change the perception that the D's are losers and on the decline after this last election. This is just step one in climbing back up on the horse but it's a critical step. They need a win here.


I agree, they are looking for absolutely anything, no matter how small or insignificant, to call a rebuke of trump. Even the Super Bowl was hyped as a symbol of drumpf finally losing and history coming back to their side again (too bad for them). Now they are pumping millions into this race to build a narrative of a coming grassroots dem resurgence. Sad.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50319 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 3:00 pm to
Classic Prog move: lie then tell everyone your opposition is doing what you are actually doing yourself. Then rely on the MSM and useful idiots to carry the water.
Posted by IdahoTiger
San Diego, CA
Member since Dec 2007
1864 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 3:03 pm to
It's the new Democratic strategy. Vice News did a big story about it. Identify races which are possible to flip, and volunteers from around the country set up centers to focus their efforts. It's a grass roots effort and it's a good strategy. Nothing wrong with it, we're all Americans here.
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10983 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 3:07 pm to
Hmmm...95%...seems low...
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15451 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 3:14 pm to
So the Dumbocrats are going to spend 20-30 million and lose.

Even if somehow they win, ever hear of a pyrrhic victory?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram