- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
91% of ABC, NBC, CBS coverage of Trump has been negative
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:02 pm
Shocking I know, but more disgusting than anything. People have no shame. Someone forward this to Hillary.
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:05 pm to The Pirate King
I'm surprised there was any positive press.
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:06 pm to The Pirate King
Some of it he brought on himself. Most of it is just pettiness on the part of the news media. Pretty pathetic actually.
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:08 pm to The Pirate King
Their response: 91% or what he does is bad/racist/homophobic/etc
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:10 pm to jimbeam
bound to happen when one is unfit for the job
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:12 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Most of it is just pettiness on the part of the news media
There is a huge difference between 'pettiness' and 'ideology.'
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:17 pm to Zach
Jealousy and pettiness is part of the core of their ideology.
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:18 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
bound to happen when one is unfit for the job
Yeah, journalists have turned to shite haven't they.
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:20 pm to The Pirate King
Think about that. Nine percent of our great American television networks are literally Hitler.
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:47 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
bound to happen when one is unfit for the job
So a billionaire who has run multiple successful businesses and bested 16 Republican candidates and the greatest woman to ever exist is unfit?
Pretty high standards you got there.
Posted on 9/16/17 at 5:55 pm to The Pirate King
Does this surprise you? MSM is runned and owned by deep state.
This post was edited on 9/16/17 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 9/16/17 at 6:39 pm to The Pirate King
pretty sure that number is low compared to reality
I dare anyone to show one time they had ANYTHING positive to say about trump since he was elected
their idea of what they call saying something positive is to just not say something negative by saying nothing at all about what he did good
I dare anyone to show one time they had ANYTHING positive to say about trump since he was elected
their idea of what they call saying something positive is to just not say something negative by saying nothing at all about what he did good
This post was edited on 9/16/17 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 9/16/17 at 6:56 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
bound to happen when one is unfit for the job
2008-16 proves otherwise
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:16 pm to Raylan70
quote:
So a billionaire who has run multiple successful businesses and bested 16 Republican candidates and the greatest woman to ever exist is unfit?
it's been entertaining watching him flail and cry
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:34 pm to The Pirate King
Do you think it really matters?
Posted on 9/16/17 at 8:23 pm to The Pirate King
So no neutral news? Do you consider coverage of Scaramucci to be "negative" coverage? How about coverage of Mike Flynn? How about the Comey firing? How about the threat of "tapes" against Comey?
Do you expect the media to not cover things because they are "negative"?
Do you expect the media to not cover things because they are "negative"?
Posted on 9/16/17 at 8:57 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Do you consider coverage of Scaramucci to be "negative" coverage
The coverage of him was, but why?
quote:
How about coverage of Mike Flynn?
The coverage of him was but why?
quote:
How about the Comey firing? How about the threat of "tapes" against Comey
Comey was a scumbag. Any coverage of his firing should be positive. It wasn't.
Posted on 9/16/17 at 10:28 pm to The Pirate King
Complaining about the negative press Trump gets is the thread of choice around here.
As has been pointed out before, the Wall Street Journal's coverage has been 70% negative. And it has an obvious, right of center, pro-business policy.
Why does Trump get 70% negative coverage from the Journal?
As has been pointed out before, the Wall Street Journal's coverage has been 70% negative. And it has an obvious, right of center, pro-business policy.
Why does Trump get 70% negative coverage from the Journal?
Posted on 9/16/17 at 10:36 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:So the coverage of Scaramucci was negative? So was Flynn? Maybe Trump has just had a generally negative presidency so far?
The coverage of him was, but why?
Can't blame the press for reporting on the presidency.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News