- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 48% support Refugee Ban 42% do not- where do you stand?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 7:17 am to davidsheroes
Posted on 1/30/17 at 7:17 am to davidsheroes
Seems like almost 100% of the folks keep using the wrong terms.
Temporary Ban is not equal to ban.
Would be nice for one news outlet to actually focus on the 90 days aspect instead of everyone calling it a BAN which sounds far more permanent than it actually is.
Not to say that at the end of 90 days the review will find it impossible to safely allow refugees in but for now, I am 100% for the temporary ban from war torn countries with almost no centralized government.
All those against, were you against Obama's immigration ban? Please show the posts you made outrages at the Osiah's 6 month ban.
Temporary Ban is not equal to ban.
Would be nice for one news outlet to actually focus on the 90 days aspect instead of everyone calling it a BAN which sounds far more permanent than it actually is.
Not to say that at the end of 90 days the review will find it impossible to safely allow refugees in but for now, I am 100% for the temporary ban from war torn countries with almost no centralized government.
All those against, were you against Obama's immigration ban? Please show the posts you made outrages at the Osiah's 6 month ban.
This post was edited on 1/30/17 at 7:19 am
0
Posted on 1/30/17 at 7:17 am to germandawg
quote:
.but why only some countries and not ones where we know that have been the home of terrorists who actually have committed acts of terror in the US? Like Saudi Arabia and Egypt and the UAE.
because it is obama's God damned list
built over 8 years of keen observation
Why would Trump throw that aside and make up something after only 10 days? Are you trying to imply the obama admin did not know what they were doing?
great observation but a little late don't you think?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 7:18 am to gthog61
Wait don't leave. Stick around quit bouncing from thread to thread and just cussing don't-
Aww dammit he left. Never will see this.
Aww dammit he left. Never will see this.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 7:23 am to germandawg
quote:If Americans were not consumed with the Tsunami of Fake News on this topic, the answer would be simple and clear.
....but why only some countries
Trump is using the best intel his predecessor accrued in identifying future terrorist nests. Obama felt the most likely threat nidi were from 7 countries.
Those are the seven locations Trump is focused on. They also happen to be countries in which our diplomatic relations make vetting very difficult.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 7:29 am to davidsheroes
Poll is racist.
I am for it, and it should be a straight up Muslim ban, period.
Regardless, as I said multiple times Saturday, Trump should direct DHS to place all refugees in the Judge's house and the homes of the ACLU lawyers (as well as all of the handwringing Congressional Dems). They want them? They can have them.
I am for it, and it should be a straight up Muslim ban, period.
Regardless, as I said multiple times Saturday, Trump should direct DHS to place all refugees in the Judge's house and the homes of the ACLU lawyers (as well as all of the handwringing Congressional Dems). They want them? They can have them.
This post was edited on 1/30/17 at 7:41 am
Posted on 1/30/17 at 7:31 am to davidsheroes
Where's the banhammer at?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 7:40 am to davidsheroes
I'm for a ban on all Muslims and their sympathizers. Round them up and ship them out. That would include several on this board. I can find a new Dr.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:56 am to gthog61
quote:
because it is obama's God damned list
built over 8 years of keen observation
Why would Trump throw that aside and make up something after only 10 days? Are you trying to imply the obama admin did not know what they were doing?
great observation but a little late don't you think?
I see...so the Obama administration was right on this subject....the whole blind pig and an acorn type thing, huh?
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:58 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
If Americans were not consumed with the Tsunami of Fake News on this topic, the answer would be simple and clear.
You mean the tsunami of fake news that there is a chance in hell that 120 days more vetting is going to uncover a plot that went uncovered for close to 2 years on average?
I don't give a frick if we ban 'em all....just keep in mind that it provides an awful lot of recruiting material and doesn't increase security a bit....but it does give some among warm fuzzies that we are teaching the brown bastards who they are and what their place is...
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:00 am to davidsheroes
The media freaks out over a small number of people who were inconvenienced over this, or some confusion in implementation.
What they don't get is the importance of President Trump acting visibly and decisively on his campaign promises. That is the point. Of course they take their cues from the Globalists.
What they don't get is the importance of President Trump acting visibly and decisively on his campaign promises. That is the point. Of course they take their cues from the Globalists.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:37 am to davidsheroes
Ban them all and send the ones already here back to wherever they came from. I'd rather have more illegal Mexicans honestly
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:59 am to davidsheroes
Anything that drives faux outrage from Liberal whack jobs I'm all for.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News