- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
37 year old man who hit on 16 year old at Starbucks banned
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:15 pm
LINK
Since when?!
quote:
Spokane police defended the decision to ban Werner, claiming businesses have a right to refuse service for any reason.
Since when?!
17
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:17 pm to Revelator
So you think it should be okay for grown men to hit 15yo kids?
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:18 pm to Revelator
quote:
Spokane police defended the decision to ban Werner, claiming businesses have a right to refuse service for any reason.
Unless you're a couple of queens who want to get hitched. Then you can't be refused service for any reason.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:18 pm to Chuker
quote:
So you think it should be okay for grown men to hit 15yo kids?
Do you?
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:19 pm to Chuker
quote:
So you think it should be okay for grown men to hit 15yo kids?
So much fail in such a short post.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:19 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Unless you're a couple of queens who want to get hitched. Then you can't be refused service for any reason.
Bingo!
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:19 pm to Revelator
Pics of 16 year old?
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:22 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Hugo Stiglitz
Freak
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:26 pm to Chuker
quote:
So you think it should be okay for grown men to hit 15yo kids?
Creepy? Yes.
Age of consent in Washington is 16 according to the article which I'm assuming is the issue.
Legally, that would mean he did nothing legally wrong. The barista is a legal target for his flirting as long as he didn't do anything that represented harassment.
This post was edited on 1/3/17 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:30 pm to Revelator
LOL at thinking the spokane police are liberal. 
And I believe its long held legal principle that businesses can ban individuals for reasons, assuming they aren't related to civil rights.
And I believe its long held legal principle that businesses can ban individuals for reasons, assuming they aren't related to civil rights.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:33 pm to Revelator
oh look Revelator with a 'us Christians are persecuted because we cant discriminate' post
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:38 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
oh look Revelator with a 'us Christians are persecuted because we cant discriminate' post
I believe in the freedom to serve who you want as a private business. I also like pointing out hypocrisy when it is shown.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:48 pm to Revelator
Age of consent is 16 in Washington, so legally he did nothing wrong if all he did was flirt with her or ask her out.
Now that being said Starbucks is a private corporation who should be allowed to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Yes, that includes refusing service for being gay, black, female, etc. Public accommodation laws have outlived their usefulness.
Now that being said Starbucks is a private corporation who should be allowed to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Yes, that includes refusing service for being gay, black, female, etc. Public accommodation laws have outlived their usefulness.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:49 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
civil rights
This guys is being discriminated based on age.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:50 pm to Roger Klarvin
Oh look. A post by klarvin on the poliboard that's upvotable. That's rare.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:52 pm to Turbeauxdog
Who cares? Why shouldn't Starbucks be allowed to discriminate against whoever they want?
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:53 pm to Revelator
quote:
KREM reports Werner also referenced his website dedicated to “age gap love” when defending himself.
Werner does, in fact, have an entire website dedicated to why men should date young women (specifically those born in the 1990s).
Werner, who calls himself a “scientist without a degree in science,” defends his preference for younger women by saying having children with men over 35 will give the children “stronger DNA.”
Throughout his Facebook pages, Werner accuses people who don't accept his “age gap love” theory of being “hateful” and “ageist and against truth like Republicans.”
Yea, let's hold a rally for this guy.
The dude is obviously a creeper and I seriously doubt his side of the story where he acts completely innocent of being a pervy frick that was weirding out the staff.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:54 pm to 3nOut
quote:
Oh look. A post by klarvin on the poliboard that's upvotable. That's rare.
My levity goes unappreciated here. It just so happens most in this zoo agree with me on this topic, albeit often for different reasons
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:55 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Werner, who calls himself a “scientist without a degree in science,”
Homeboy would fit in well here
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:55 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
oh look Revelator with a 'us Christians are persecuted because we cant discriminate' post
oh look, a predictable anti-Christian bigot policing the board for any perceived slight to his world view
Take a deep breath Cupcake
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News