Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Solo 401(k) Add the Spouse question - again

Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:58 am
Posted by igoringa
South Mississippi
Member since Jun 2007
11875 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:58 am
I asked this a few months ago and it resulted in a gem of guidance that saved me a ton.

But back to the original question - I am curious as to the take of the money wizards.

Facts: Solely 401(k) for my single person LLC. This allows me to put $18K + 35K (if income is sufficient) away.

However, if my wife is 'engaged' in the business, I can allocate profit (or hire her) and she can contribute also (same guideline - 18K + 35K if sufficient income).

Now I am fortunate enough to have sufficient income, but the challenge is this:

For every dollar I allocate to my wife, I will have to pay the full boat on Social Security ($15.2%), whereas if I don't allocate, that incremental money is only at 3.2%.

So, does anyone think it is worth paying this 12% penalty (my words) to get the deferral of income tax on the cash?

Note: Already have her set up with HRA thanks to advice last go around.

Posted by igoringa
South Mississippi
Member since Jun 2007
11875 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 10:29 am to
One bump and I will let it die.

Just curious as to folks take.
Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
5973 posts
Posted on 2/21/15 at 8:14 am to
What I have seen some people do is not put the big income to their wife, but a much smaller salary - say $22,000 - to their wife, and she can then save the full $18,000 plus a small amount of "employer" contribution on top of that. With your set-up there is no testing to be concerned with since there are no employees.

So, if my math is correct your "12% penalty" is $2,640 but you're saving at least $7,000 or more in taxes - just multiply the $26k (22k salary to her plus her portion of the employer contribution) by your tax rate and compare. Your wife's employer contribution should be able to get to about $4,400 at that income.

I think its worth it.

I do suggest asking your CPA to run a quick cost benefit analysis as there are always tax considerations that could pop up that a simple comparison can't cover.
Posted by igoringa
South Mississippi
Member since Jun 2007
11875 posts
Posted on 2/25/15 at 9:13 am to
quote:

So, if my math is correct your "12% penalty" is $2,640 but you're saving at least $7,000 or more in taxes - just multiply the $26k (22k salary to her plus her portion of the employer contribution) by your tax rate and compare. Your wife's employer contribution should be able to get to about $4,400 at that income.


Thanks. The reason I refer to it as a penalty is that if I keep the income under my name it will never be subjected to the 12%. Thus, if I do this, I am paying 12% for the right to defer taxes on this amount (not eliminate).

So to me the math is whether it is worth paying 12% more now to defer income tax for 20+ years.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram