- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is everyone happy about today?
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:09 pm
Seems like we did excellent
16
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:10 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Incoming complaining about not signing a LB.
I love this class.
I love this class.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:11 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
No.
Sorry...lol
Sorry...lol
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:11 pm to MCSquared16
No LB's! Seriously??? We need Chavis. 
This post was edited on 2/4/15 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:17 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
If LSU pulls Divinity and Joyner next class, it will all be ok. The o and d line recruiting blew away my expectations from a month ago.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:20 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Very excited about the offensive and secondary haul, not so excited about the lack of players in the front seven
Next year the state is loaded, that had to have something to do with it
Next year the state is loaded, that had to have something to do with it
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:21 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
I'm very happy with the overall talent. However, the holes in this class will cause us problems down the line. If you write each position group in one column, and the nmber of signees in the next, they should be roughly equal. A great program will recruit that way. LSU rarely recruts that way. We usually have some big gaps. This year was one of the worst examples, with zero LBs or DTs.
Pick a random consistent program, that starts with "A", and do the same exercise. It will match, almost exactly, every friggin year. That's the gap we need to close. That's what will change us from an every four years cycle to an every year cycle.
We're getting as much talent as anyone else. The NFL rosters prove that. We just need to smooth it out.
Pick a random consistent program, that starts with "A", and do the same exercise. It will match, almost exactly, every friggin year. That's the gap we need to close. That's what will change us from an every four years cycle to an every year cycle.
We're getting as much talent as anyone else. The NFL rosters prove that. We just need to smooth it out.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:22 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
It's a good class, but we needed DT and LB recruits
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:22 pm to Penrod
Glaring holes in this class overall. I'd put it at a 6.5/10. Last year and 2011 were amazing.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:24 pm to kc8876
I have an idea.
Stop going after kids in Mississippi.
Stop going after kids in Mississippi.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:28 pm to Penrod
Zero rbs, in 2013.
Did that hurt us? No.
Did that hurt us? No.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:30 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Seems like it's been very quiet or maybe I just wasn't paying that close of attention
Who's our most hyped recruit?
And did we get any QB's?
Who's our most hyped recruit?
And did we get any QB's?
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:32 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Zero rbs, in 2013.
Did that hurt us? No
Not analogous. At all.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:33 pm to kc8876
quote:
It's a good class, but we needed DT and LB recruits
Our biggest position of needs were ot, rb, cb and de.
Not lb and DT. We didn't lose a single DT, and gain two with Trey L and valentine.
Linebackers we have beckwith, Louis, Jones, Garrett, Riley. Can move a guy like voorhies there. Also wouldn't be surprised to see us in 3 man fronts with our undersized ends playing linebacker.
We are fine.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:36 pm to dgnx6
quote:
We are fine.
Didn't say we weren't, still needed one of each at those positions
This post was edited on 2/4/15 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:37 pm to lsu2006
quote:
Not analogous. At all.
How so, the guy said we need to sign guys at every position every year. Says it hurt us in the past. I'm simply pointing out where it didn't.
So should we take guys from in state at DT that never would have played for LSU? What's the point?
I agree we should gave gone harder after migginus, but we didn't. Not the end of the world. Our linebackers usually have been the weakest area on the team under chavis save a couple of players that weren't even recruited by him.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:38 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Zero rbs, in 2013. Did that hurt us? No.
RB position is a lot easier to plug and play vs. LB or DT. Happy with class but LB was really needed. Maybe Melvin Jones can come back?
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:39 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Not lb and DT. We didn't lose a single DT, and gain two with Trey L and valentine.
But if we signed some they would have already had a year under their belt. It's all about preparing for the future.
Now the kids we bring in next year will have to develop very quickly
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:40 pm to MJM
Well it is the only time in miles' tenure we had back to back top 5 classes. And yes we signed a back to back Texas state champ qb in its highest division.
People will bitch just to bitch instead of being happy for young men that did decide to play for us. Even with a shake up in the staff and a down year record wise.
People will bitch just to bitch instead of being happy for young men that did decide to play for us. Even with a shake up in the staff and a down year record wise.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:42 pm to dgnx6
quote:
How so
It's way harder to make an impact as a freshman LB or DT than as a freshman RB.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News