Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Avoiding the 8-9 Trap in NCAA

Posted on 1/29/15 at 2:43 pm
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17500 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 2:43 pm
Yeah, looking ahead, whatever.

So I have a spreadsheet in the past on tounrey info for..."entertainment" purposes.

Anyway, since 2005, there have been 50/80 BCS Conference teams that were 8 or 9 seeds.

Overall, only 4/80 have made it to sweet 16 or farther: 2011 Butler (Runner Up), 2014 Kentucky (Runner up), 2013 Wichita State (Final 4), 2010 Northern Iowa (Sweet 16).

Of the 50 BCS schools, here are some stats:
Range of wins: 19-26(2009 LSU (we got screwed!)
Average wins/Losses: 21.5-10.6
Median wins/losses:21-11
Average RPI *: 36.9
Average KenPom*: 30.5

*missing 3/10 seasons but will update soon


Right now we're at 16-4 with 11 games left in regular season:
@MSU
Auburn
Alabama
Kentucky
@UT
@TAM
Florida
@Auburn
Ole Miss
UT
@Arkansas

Current KenPom: 34
Current RPI: 36

So...It would seem likely we can place higher than the characteristics of the 8/9 teams. Obviously the more wins the better, but as of today, seems like we're indecent shape to avoid the 8/9.
Posted by lsucjn
California
Member since Dec 2005
509 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 3:04 pm to
I think we finish 23-8, which puts on NCAA bubble. No better than a 10 seed.
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40486 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 3:07 pm to
I think this team could beat a #1 seed. Say they played Virginia, it would be a low scoring, drag em out game that could go either way. That said, if they can somehow move their way to a 6 seed or down to an 11, that would be optimal.
This post was edited on 1/29/15 at 3:07 pm
Posted by ALT F4
Member since Jan 2015
2292 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 3:08 pm to
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4450 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 3:10 pm to
If we are in the NCAAs I don't care what our seed is. UVA is a bad matchup in my opinion
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17168 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

I think this team could beat a #1 seed.


I read this as "we could be a #1 seed"


I was thinking uhhh....nooooo
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 3:34 pm to
That 09 team got royally screwed, what a horrible seed that year. Team was much better than that, total bullshite


imo I'd prefer 6,7,10,11 over 8,9
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

I think we finish 23-8, which puts on NCAA bubble. No better than a 10 seed.



I don't think we'd be on the bubble at 12-6 in the SEC with a win @ WVU.

You're also forgetting about the SEC tourney
This post was edited on 1/29/15 at 3:38 pm
Posted by RANDY44
Member since Aug 2005
9572 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

No better than a 10 seed.

Would be better off at 10 than 8/9 IMO. Looking at most of the projected 2's and I think the Tigers would have a shot with most. BTW if they would go 23-8 I think 1 and 1 in the tourney probably gets them smack dab in the dreaded 8/9 slot.
Posted by Buga225
Denham Springs
Member since Jan 2015
465 posts
Posted on 1/29/15 at 4:50 pm to
23-8 with a win against UK will easily get us at 6 or 7!
Posted by Mshargois3
NOLA
Member since Jan 2014
1664 posts
Posted on 1/30/15 at 12:16 am to
20-11
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 12:17 am
Posted by TigerRoad
Alexandria
Member since Jan 2015
163 posts
Posted on 1/30/15 at 1:55 am to
Great info. In addition, playing close to Louisiana would be beneficial also, as compared to going to Idaho, Oregon or the Carolinas.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram