Started By
Message

Kelvin Benjamin or Brandin Cooks?

Posted on 1/26/15 at 1:10 pm
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
9313 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 1:10 pm
Knowing what you know now, if you could have the 2014 draft over, would you take Kelvin Benjamin or Brandin Cooks? (Of course, for the sake of this argument, the choice is just between these two players with our 1st round pick.) I'll throw their stats in to help.

Kelvin Benjamin:

Receiving
16 games, 73 catches, 1008 yards, 9 TDs
Rushing
No stats.

Average game: 4.6 catches, 63 total yards, .57 TDs


Brandin Cooks:

Receiving
10 games, 53 catches, 550 yards, 3 TDs
Rushing
10 games, 7 carries, 73 yards, 1 TD

Average game: 5.3 catches, 62 total yards, .25 TD

On face value, it looks like Benjamin is the superior player and the right pick, but when looking at the averages per game, Cooks holds his own. Benjamin did score a lot more TDs but he was also targeted 146 times as the only legit WR at Carolina, while Cooks was often a check down option. I guess I could go either way on this, but I do think Cooks speed will eventually translate to more dynamic plays. (But I do admit, Benjamin would've made replacing Colston a whole lot easier...)
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 1:21 pm to
I'd take Benjamin. He's a legit #1 receiver.

Cooks the last few games was looking pretty damn good though and getting behind the defense
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166136 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 1:22 pm to
Benjamin played lights out this year, hats off to him. Cooks played on a team with a bit more options but should be great as well.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43469 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 1:25 pm to
michael clayton or devery henderson.. which wr would you have wanted after their first year?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64206 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 1:31 pm to
Don't think Kelvin would have gotten as many thrown his way on our team.
Two very different WR's.
Both look good so far and would want to see more before I jumped into this burning cauldron of debate!
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166136 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

michael clayton or devery henderson.. which wr would you have wanted after their first year?


i'd want michael clayton's talent and body with devery's mind and dedication to the craft.
Posted by illuminatic
Manipulating politicans&rappers
Member since Sep 2012
6962 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 1:57 pm to
Cooks.

I was a huge Cooks fan pre draft along with a lot of other people. He didn't do anything before the injury to make me think he won't be really good. Once his usage gets better, he has the potential to be an Antonio Brown type player IMO.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56378 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

On face value, it looks like Benjamin is the superior player and the right pick, but when looking at the averages per game, Cooks holds his own. Benjamin did score a lot more TDs but he was also targeted 146 times as the only legit WR at Carolina, while Cooks was often a check down option. I guess I could go either way on this, but I do think Cooks speed will eventually translate to more dynamic plays. (But I do admit, Benjamin would've made replacing Colston a whole lot easier...)



If I had to make another choice right now based on what we know, I'd take Benjamin in a heartbeat.

Obviously, things could change. But, I didn't think our offense was any better with Cooks than without it.
Posted by Throbinhood
Southern LA
Member since Sep 2013
819 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Brandin Cooks


Any day

Benjamin is a great player but he had a lot of drops this year. That was something that was a knock on him coming in was that his hands weren't that great. He can make an incredible catch one play then drop the next three that hit him in the hands
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Obviously, things could change. But, I didn't think our offense was any better with Cooks than without it.



It was a hell of a lot better when he played, but there are other factors there too.

Averaged 26.1 ppg with him; 22.8 without him.
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 2:13 pm to
Cooks is a better and more versatile WR. KB had an amazing rookie year, but that's mainly because he was asked to be the number 1 guy, and was easily the most targeted. When the ball is thrown your way that much you're bound to have good stats. He had A LOT of drops.
Posted by Laaz2750
Los Angeles
Member since Aug 2008
8378 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 2:23 pm to
I'm pretty excited about the fact that, for all the reasons noted above, this is a pick 'em.
Posted by PurpleDrank18
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2011
4508 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 2:47 pm to
Not taking anything away from Benjamin and his talent, but a good portion of his stats came in garbage time/catch up play.
Posted by Meaux Bettah
Tiger Nation
Member since Nov 2011
2591 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 2:50 pm to
Kelvin seems healthier.
Posted by OchoGregO
BR
Member since Jun 2009
232 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 2:54 pm to
Both should be pro bowlers in the next 5-7 years. I'll take cooks but it's close. His speed is world class. For our offense we have big bodies in Graham and Colston already. My biggest gripe is having to lose a 3rd rounder when this was the deepest WR draft in years if not decades. But there's no telling how good or bad that pick would have been anyways
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10047 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 3:01 pm to
I wanted Cooks in the draft. Benjamin supposedly had a a terrible work ethic along with a weight problem. I was praying we wouldn't take him. Sometimes guys respond positively to people pointing out their flaws. I'd take the hard worker in Cooks again I think. With how bad the rest of our draft went, the loss of the 3rd was probably just one less player the front office would have had to cut.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 3:13 pm to
Benjamin's stats were inflated to an extent because of the limited receiving options on the panthers. The ball was routinely forced to him. Overall, he looked pretty good and had some great catches, but he also had a ton of big drops. If he doesn't do a lot to work on his drop problem it will be a major issue for him going forward.

Cooks didn't show the playmaking ability that I was hoping for and thinking that we would get with him, but for the most part he seemed solid and reliable.

I think it's pretty close to a wash right now.
This post was edited on 1/26/15 at 3:15 pm
Posted by Thurber
NWLA
Member since Aug 2013
15402 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 4:10 pm to
Benjamin had a great year, no doubt, but I really liked what I saw from Cooks this year
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155398 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 4:27 pm to
brandin "tois in the attick" cooks
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16322 posts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Benjamin's stats were inflated to an extent because of the limited receiving options on the panthers.


I would also add that the defenses he faced were primarily concerned with the running game; especially towards the end of the season.

I also think Cooks has more upside. As many have pointed out, Benjamin had a good year but had issues with drops (mainly resulting form concentration) and reportedly had a poor work ethic.

My vote would be for Cooks.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram