- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NFL needs to add this one rule to overtime
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:39 pm
Keep every thing the same as it is but change one thing. If team A scores a TD on the first possession, the team B is given the ball to score a TD. If team B scores a TD, they are forced to go for 2.
This way both teams are given a fair chance. So Green Bay should get the ball for one last drive after the Seattle TD.
Btw, I have a Seattle ticket to win the SB, so this post is not emotionally driven.
This way both teams are given a fair chance. So Green Bay should get the ball for one last drive after the Seattle TD.
Btw, I have a Seattle ticket to win the SB, so this post is not emotionally driven.
22
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:40 pm to PeteRose
Just play another fricking quarter
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:40 pm to PeteRose
The Aaron Rodgers rule?
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:40 pm to PeteRose
No.
Your idea sucks
Your idea sucks
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:40 pm to PeteRose
GB didn't deserve a second chance
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:41 pm to PeteRose
Goddamn, are we just going to keep moving the goal posts on overtime rules every year?
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:41 pm to PeteRose
I like college OT. Just move them further back to start out. Probably a lot that wouldn't agree with that though.
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:43 pm to PeteRose
Weren't you the guy who purposed tcu play Ohio State for the NC or ban their program for a year?? Your ideas, where do you find them?
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:43 pm to PeteRose
quote:
This way both teams are given a fair chance
That's not fair for both teams.
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:44 pm to happyhappyjoyjoy
yea I really don't understand why they can't just play another quarter
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:45 pm to PeteRose
you just earned a lifetime ban from the MSB HOF
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:45 pm to PeteRose
I completely disagree with your proposal.
The defense is part of the team. If your defense isn't good enough to stop a TD on one possession then your offense doesn't deserve a shot no matter how good they are.
The defense is part of the team. If your defense isn't good enough to stop a TD on one possession then your offense doesn't deserve a shot no matter how good they are.
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:48 pm to VermilionTiger
My idea doesn't suck. It accomplish 2 things;
1. It gives both teams equal chances.
2. It's a lot shorter than college OT
Maybe if you are a thinker, then it should be pretty obvious.
1. It gives both teams equal chances.
2. It's a lot shorter than college OT
Maybe if you are a thinker, then it should be pretty obvious.
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:48 pm to TH03
quote:TV networks like rigidly fixed schedules
yea I really don't understand why they can't just play another quarter
otherwise get the game over ASAP
Wasn't the PGA originally match play? (which can go on forever) And the networks made them change it?
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:52 pm to LesMiles BFF
quote:
The defense is part of the team. If your defense isn't good enough to stop a TD on one possession then your offense doesn't deserve a shot no matter how good they are.
Then why do teams take turn getting the ball 1st half and second half? I'm talking about making the rules equitable and you're talking about bad defense doesn't deserve a shot.
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:52 pm to PeteRose
quote:
1. It gives both teams equal chances.
It doesn't. It favors the 2nd team if they score a TD because they have to go for the win and strategy is taken out of their hands.
It forces the first team to also go for 2 if they score a TD so either they make it and the 2nd team can just tie or they don't make it and the 2nd team has no pressure as long as they score a TD because the first team would just have 6.
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:53 pm to PeteRose
I like the Sudden Death OT rules. I have no problem with it,
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:53 pm to PeteRose
Why force them to go for 2. I think they should get a shot to tie it, but they shouldn't be forced to go for 2
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:56 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Posted by BluegrassBelle I like college OT. Just move them further back to start out. Probably a lot that wouldn't agree with that though.
I agree with you 100%. Start with the ball at midfield or the other team's 40. I love the college OT. Each team should get the ball in OT.
Posted on 1/18/15 at 5:57 pm to Walking the Earth
quote:
It doesn't. It favors the 2nd team if they score a TD because they have to go for the win and strategy is taken out of their hands. It forces the first team to also go for 2 if they score a TD so either they make it and the 2nd team can just tie or they don't make it and the 2nd team has no pressure as long as they score a TD because the first team would just have 6.
1st team has to go for 1. 2nd team has to go for 2. So we are taking a tie out of the equation. It's a win or lose situation. Nfl 2pt conversion rate is around 50%.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News