Started By
Message

re: How you feel about the Dez "catch" situation yesterday if that were Colston?

Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:50 am to
Posted by Chadzilla
Houma
Member since Feb 2014
629 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:50 am to
Right after the CB nudges the ball a little bit Dez regrips the ball, takes 3 steps, and then has his elbow hit the ground before the ball is not in his possession again. He had enough possession for it to be a catch if he was going out of bounds and not falling.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84081 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:53 am to
quote:

i never saw ball hit ground and move


Did you not have your glasses on? The ball literally came out of his hand.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84081 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:53 am to
quote:

He had enough possession for it to be a catch if he was going out of bounds and not falling.


Wrong, you still have to maintain possession through the ground, even when going out of bounds. This is nothing new.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72619 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:55 am to
quote:

took 3 steps


obviously a catch then. ground cannot cause a fumble otherwise it would have been a recovery and a TD, but this is pro ball where you have to be touched by a defender before being ruled down......
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72619 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Did you not have your glasses on? The ball literally came out of his hand.




guess i'll have to rewatch the replay....maybe they gave me a bad camera angle?
Posted by illuminatic
Manipulating politicans&rappers
Member since Sep 2012
6962 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:00 am to
quote:

No, its a stupid rule that possession isn't established after having 2 feet down + a knee and control of the ball.


Never had control. Never made a football move.

starting at 10 sec mark

In the video you see that around 10 seconds he double catches the ball while he's stumbling. He never had full control with both feet in. Once he secures the ball around 13 sec mark, he start his lunge which ends with the whole length of the ball hitting the ground. Pretty clearly an incomplete pass.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166246 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:00 am to
Should a been a catch, lots of guys dive for enszone and lose control of ball
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84081 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:01 am to
Watch the end of this vine video, you see the ball clearly come out of his grip. LINK
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72619 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:01 am to
quote:

ng, you still have to maintain possession through the ground, even when going out of bounds.


correct and per the rule you have to basically maintain control for an eternity even after the fact. which is nuts.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84081 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:01 am to
quote:

lots of guys dive for enszone and lose control of ball


Not in the process of making the catch they don't.
Posted by illuminatic
Manipulating politicans&rappers
Member since Sep 2012
6962 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:02 am to
But he never established possession.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84081 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:03 am to
quote:

for an eternity


It doesn't need to be an eternity, just can't clearly lose grip of the ball when it hits the ground. had he not lost control of it, it would have been a catch, even hitting the ground.
Posted by Chadzilla
Houma
Member since Feb 2014
629 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:10 am to
quote:


Wrong, you still have to maintain possession through the ground, even when going out of bounds. This is nothing new.



I said if we was going out of bounds and not falling. . He had clear control and took 3 steps. That would have been a catch had he been going out of bounds and not falling.

ETA: That's my problem with the whole thing. Had he been not going to the ground it's a catch. If the ground can't cause a fumble after gaining possession then it shouldn't cause an incompletion after gaining possession.
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 9:14 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84081 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:11 am to
Well, he was falling, you don't get to take that out. It also would have been a catch had he not fallen and walked into the endzone, but that's not what happened here.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72619 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Watch the end of this vine video, you see the ball clearly come out of his grip. LINK



ok, i think i see now what the replay official was looking at. So the argument is he never had control during the 3 steps before that either right? Thus them ruling it a no catch?
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:19 am to
quote:

How you feel about the Dez "catch" situation yesterday if that were Colston?
The same way I felt about Dez. It was correct via the rulebook, but there is something about that rule that makes it seem senseless that that wasn't a catch and then a fumble.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33742 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:25 am to
quote:

I'd be pissed at the stupid rule and made that it hasn't been changed after years of complaints


that's kind of where we're with that awful illegal contact rule.

guys complained over and over and the league finally broke down and complied.

today's NFL is so weird to watch compared to to the one I grew up watching.

I get the part about player safety but some of these other tic-tac fouls are worthless in my opinion.

and this "Calvin Johnson" rule that came into play yesterday shouldn't decide a game like that at a time like that.

although I thought it was funny because it couldn't have happened to a better team... crushing their dreams.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84081 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:29 am to
quote:

and this "Calvin Johnson" rule that came into play yesterday shouldn't decide a game like that at a time like that.


It's not like there was no time left. The Dallas D wouldn't have stopped Rodgers from winning the game.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
22720 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:31 am to
I feel like he caught it, took two steps, reached for the endzone and lost control all in the same process. By rule, it should be incomplete because he was going to the ground in the process of the catch, and in doing so, must complete process. Common sense tells me he caught it, fumbled it, and regained possession.

I think it was the right call according to the rule, but shouldn't be the rule.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:35 am to
quote:

I feel like he caught it,

He didn't control the ball until after
quote:

two steps,

and when he
quote:

eached for the endzone

he
quote:

lost control all in the same process



first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram